Birthright DECISION, Trump is WRONG.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
It's fascinating.
The 14th was never in question, Comrade.
And have you Stalinist decided that Equal Justice under the law is okay now? If so, that's quite the reversal for the party of racial quotas.
QP!
Verified User
Yup, there is no chance for a Constitutional amendment by either party based on how bipartisan that needs to be both in Congress and amongst States.
The magat path to getting that change is simply to have the radical Supreme COurt amend the Constitution from the bench as they did give Trump and future POTUS immunity, something that Congress would need to do a full Constitutional amendment to achieve.
The good news is that the magats would need an even more extreme bench of radical right wing Justices and while Alito and Thomas will almost certainly be replaced by even more radicals (Aileen Cannon and Emil Bove) who will be able to serve for 30+ years, that will not change the numbers game as Thomas and Alito were already guaranteed magat votes.
If the Dems gain the House and Senate it is imperative they expand the court to 13 Justices and place 4 Justices right away. the history of the SC is that is what typically expanded to match the Circuit Court expansion and they have been up to 13 for a long time now. And it is clear the case load on the 9 is too high with many important cases unable to be heard.
QP!
Verified User
That report has been withdrawn as mistaken. No announcement on retirement yet but it is expected.
Both Alito and Thomas will face immense pressure to retire BEFORE the MT's just in case the Dems take the House and then they can use the Mitch precedent to not confirm any Trump nominees.
QP!
Verified User
i'm really hoping they both hold.
The only reason they might leave is fear the Dems take the Senate, so i am hoping they convince themselves that is a real long shot and not to act based on it. Then i want the Dem to 'Garland' any Trump nominees if they end up having to step down while the Dems control the Senate.
I want to watch the magats cry and scream about why it is wrong for the Dems to not give their nominees their process and why it is 'different' than what was done to Garland, which they will claim was proper.
Did the Dissent describe a path to success? There were rumors... (or rumours for those british amongst us)....
what a moronic take
this never was about repealing an amendment. the level of dishonesty in every contribution you make is disgusting. A shit stain of a human if there ever was one
QP!
Verified User
Kavanaugh's concurrence gave a little light to a path for future success if this issue comes back. He was trying to narrow the amendment to say it was really just about 'slavery' and not protections for all others.
0/10
Jesus was a horse?
It's a poor attempt at trolling that was supposed to be an argument.
Beating the dead horse aren't you?
That is true. That is why we have the Supreme Court.