Blacks now insist on "right" to use Starbucks bathroom though not customers!!!
- Thread starter Text Drivers are Killers
- Start date
[h=1]#DrinkingCoffeeWhileBlack[/h]In another episode of Some White People Being Surprised When White People Are Racist…
Scrolling through my Twitter feed I saw a video posted by Melissa DePino that showed two Black men being arrested in a Philadelphia Starbucks for merely waiting on a friend to arrive before placing their order.
Or as Black people call it, Thursday.
Starbucks has branded itself as a company that is concerned diversity and inclusion stating on its website,”Embracing diversity only enhances our work culture, it also drives our business success. It is the inclusion of these diverse experiences and perspectives that create a culture of empowerment, one that fosters innovation, economic growth and new ideas.” Starbucks CEO, Kevin Johnson, stated in an article written by Ronald Holden in Business Insider that, “We are in the business of human connection.”
Really?
If this is what you consider human connection this is a serious fail.
https://writesomeshit.com/2018/04/14/drinkingcoffeewhileblack/
Scrolling through my Twitter feed I saw a video posted by Melissa DePino that showed two Black men being arrested in a Philadelphia Starbucks for merely waiting on a friend to arrive before placing their order.
Or as Black people call it, Thursday.
Starbucks has branded itself as a company that is concerned diversity and inclusion stating on its website,”Embracing diversity only enhances our work culture, it also drives our business success. It is the inclusion of these diverse experiences and perspectives that create a culture of empowerment, one that fosters innovation, economic growth and new ideas.” Starbucks CEO, Kevin Johnson, stated in an article written by Ronald Holden in Business Insider that, “We are in the business of human connection.”
Really?
If this is what you consider human connection this is a serious fail.
https://writesomeshit.com/2018/04/14/drinkingcoffeewhileblack/
[h=1]Black men arrested at Philadelphia Starbucks agree to meet with CEO[/h]
The two black men arrested at a Philadelphia Starbucks last week have agreed to meet with Starbucks CEO Kevin Johnson.
The timing of the meeting has not been set, according to a Starbucks spokesperson. The company said it hopes the meeting will occur this week while Johnson is in Philadelphia addressing the controversy over their arrests.
A store manager called the police because the two men were sitting in the store without placing an order. They were arrested for trespassing. The customers said they were waiting for another man to arrive. That person arrived at the store as they were being arrested.
In an interview Monday on ABC's "Good Morning America," Johnson said he hoped to meet with the two men in person to apologize face to face.
"I'd like to have a dialogue with them so that I can ensure that we have opportunity to really understand the situation and show some compassion and empathy for the experience they went through," he said. "Finally as we're working to solve this, I'd like to invite them to join me in finding a constructive way to solve this issue."
http://money.cnn.com/2018/04/16/news/companies/starbucks-ceo-apology/index.html
The two black men arrested at a Philadelphia Starbucks last week have agreed to meet with Starbucks CEO Kevin Johnson.
The timing of the meeting has not been set, according to a Starbucks spokesperson. The company said it hopes the meeting will occur this week while Johnson is in Philadelphia addressing the controversy over their arrests.
A store manager called the police because the two men were sitting in the store without placing an order. They were arrested for trespassing. The customers said they were waiting for another man to arrive. That person arrived at the store as they were being arrested.
In an interview Monday on ABC's "Good Morning America," Johnson said he hoped to meet with the two men in person to apologize face to face.
"I'd like to have a dialogue with them so that I can ensure that we have opportunity to really understand the situation and show some compassion and empathy for the experience they went through," he said. "Finally as we're working to solve this, I'd like to invite them to join me in finding a constructive way to solve this issue."
http://money.cnn.com/2018/04/16/news/companies/starbucks-ceo-apology/index.html
SmarterthanYou
rebel
and they absolutely should. for MILLIONS. unless you feel that blacks should be 2nd class citizens with no rights to petition for redress of grievance??????
The Ugly Truth
Verified User
If YOU are sitting in front of YOUR computer, reading this, then aren't YOU the one wasting YOUR time?
The Ugly Truth
Verified User
Apparently, some people believe that blacks should be rewarded for breaking the law.
Liberalism. When stupid isn't stupid enough.
Yea you're right, there were Laws about Pissing in Bathroom ... oh the Good Old Dayzzz
BodyDouble
New member
This is akin to that "Beer Summit" that Obama had a few years back. And I'm sure the outcome will be amicable and end with a handshake and that's the last we'll hear about the matter.
Oh wait....
I've been trying to get CFM to a Beer Summit for months ... WTF is it going to take, I'm thirsty?
BodyDouble
New member
Who the fuck would want to drink with your sorry and lame ass?I've been trying to get CFM to a Beer Summit for months ... WTF is it going to take, I'm thirsty?
Text Drivers are Killers
Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
HAHAHA. This loony thinks these two black thugs should get millions of dollars because a company wouldn't let them use the bathroom without buying something.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
what law did they break?
The Ugly Truth
Verified User
It's called loitering.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
its called selective enforcement. I've sat for 8 hours in starbucks just to work on their wifi, nobody said shit to me.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
https://www.educatedinlaw.org/1999/06/supreme-court-strikes-down-loitering-law/
The Supreme Court ruled that a Chicago anti-loitering law is unconstitutional because it violated one’s first Amendment right to assemble peaceably. This ruling indicates that the Supreme Court may eventually rule that curfews, which also indirectly restrict public gatherings, are also unconstitutional.
Justice John Paul Stevens, a Chicago native, said, “in this instance, the city has enacted an ordinance that affords too much discretion to the police and too little notice to citizens who wish to use the public streets.” He wrote that the ordinance, which gave police authority to disperse and subsequently arrest known gang members and those associating with them, was a “violation of freedom of assembly.”
“It criminalized status, not conduct,” Stevens wrote. “It allows and even encourages arbitrary police enforcement.” It is “impermissibly vague on its face and an arbitrary restriction on personal liberties.”