BLM chapter calls American flag 'symbol of hatred'

452509.gif



...nothing more needs said.

wow!! pretty good for a trump bitch!! he can paste a stupid fuck meme on the internet!! big boy!
 
You just lack knowledge of world history. You insinuate I am trying to defend wrongs committed by the U. S. which misses the point. I am saying the U. S. is no worse than other countries of the world that mistreat others.

The lands of American Indians was taken from previous Indians living there. They took slaves and created empires out of conquered peoples. Nazi Germany killed millions of its own people and millions from other lands it invaded. Millions died in the Soviet Union and China in political purges. Currently countries like Brazil are wiping out Indians as they develop their forests and take away land rights.

The Spanish conquest and colonization of Latin America was certainly no less destructive than segregation; or England's conquest and colonization of India and other lands.

This is not a contest about what country is the "worst" but to show inhumanity is widespread and long-term.

This is written by somebody who actually knows what they are talking about regarding India, sadly precious few Americans do.

If The British Had Never Ruled Our Country, This Would Be India Today



Souvik Ray

Updated on Mar 14, 2017, 12:24 IST

The British ruled the Indian subcontinent for nearly 200 years starting with the East India Company in 1757 after Robert Clive's forces won the Battle of Plassey, and the British Empire which crushed the Revolt of 1857. But what if the British explorers had never come to Indian shores or failed to conquer the peninsula? What would India have been like now?

1. A fragmented nation

The British rule may have united India, but in their absence, the result is the presence of 60-100 princely states that co-exist as rivals or alliances. The big boys in this political set up would probably be the Sikh rulers in the north west, the Marathas in western and central India, and the Mysore Kingdom of Tipu Sultan.

india_map2_1438155362.jpg


2. Decline of the Mughal Empire


The Mughals survived as a puppet state under the East India Company. However given the circumstances of this story, their power is rapidly declining with weak rulers and the borders of their territories recede towards Delhi and Uttar Pradesh. The rulers of Kashmir, Punjab and the Rajputs pose an imminent threat to the once powerful empire.

3. Presence of other European powers

In the absence of the British and their powerful navy, other European colonial powers enter the waters of Asia. In accordance with actual history, the Portuguese and the French occupy Goa and Pondicherry respectively. With no other worthy opponents, their rivals are the Spanish who occupy the Philippines and the Dutch who have established plantations in Indonesia.

The Portuguese would try to expand further into India. However, they are not as enterprising as the British, and being a trade link between Europe and India is their only interest.

The French Revolution in 1789 affects the French territories as their coffers are empty in funding the war back home. This weakens French influence, leaving them vulnerable should there be any conflict with the Portuguese or Indian kingdoms.


french_india_1741-1754_1438155828.jpg


4. Consolidation of British power elsewhere

The British colonies were strong in the Americas, Africa and Australia. With India not being a part of their territory, perhaps they would have put their best interests in these lands and managed to suppress the American Revolution.

5. Slow development of the railways

The British introduced the railways in 1871, but given their absence, the emergence of railways would probably come about much later in the 20th century and would not have covered every part of the country. Perhaps the rail routes would exist from industrial areas that produce raw materials thereby increasing efficiency in transport towards cities and ports.
The pioneers of railways would probably be the stronger and more westernised kingdoms like Baroda, Mysore, Hyderabad and Punjab in collaboration with western powers like the Portuguese and Dutch.

24coaches_1438155926.jpg


6. Wars and rebellions

The popularity of regional languages and differences in religion and caste would spur wars and rebellions in various kingdoms which could probably lead to the reduction of their size. As states continue to fragment further, some of them consider not having monarchies and dictatorships as their form of government.

7. Birth of nationalism

The unification of Germany, Italy and the American Civil War, inspire the educated classes to think along the lines of democracy and nationalism. They want a united India that thrives in diversity but the reality is much different from their ideals.

youtube_1438155960.jpg


8. World War II

The arrival of World War II affects India deeply as some battles fought in Asia and Japan pose an imminent threat as their Imperial Army defeats European powers occupying South East Asia.

India, still a continent of kingdoms is left with opposing views on which power cluster they should align themselves with. As the Japanese take control of Singapore and Indonesia, their next target is Burma. This leaves much of the Eastern and Southern coast under threat (the Japanese did have air raids over Calcutta in the 1940s). The kingdoms/states in these areas support the Allies and depend on the United States, the British and the French.

The North western frontier fears attacks by the Soviet Union and the British who are approaching Afghanistan. They appeal to the Axis powers for help, relying on the Germans and Italians.

The northern kingdoms like Punjab would probably go as far as assisting the Japanese to annex the Eastern coast in order to help them fight off the Soviets.

9. After World War II

We're assuming the war ended as it did in actual history, with the defeat of the Axis. India is divided into two blocks, each with their own political ideologies. The Allies influence peninsular India, while the Soviets set up a Communist government in the north, which borders China and Central Asia.

haikudeck_1438155996.jpg


10. The Cold War

North and South India spend the Cold War hostile to one another due to the differences in their political ideologies. Monarchies no longer exist in the north while the south is a union of democratic states. North India follows East Germany and North Korea in attempts to prevent its citizens from escaping the vicious regime to the South.

11. The modern era

The collapse of the Soviet Union, the Afghan wars, the fall of the Berlin Wall and the Tienanmen Square massacre, expose the failed concept of communism and socialism which leads to the collapse of the North Indian government as people call for a unified India as an economic block much like the European Union today. India's economies mix the best of socialism and capitalism and refuse to take part in the US-led coalition to overthrow the Taliban, who are ruling from Kandahar.

india_map_1438156103.jpg


12. India today


India would probably be a continent in itself consisting of 30-40 states each aligning its identity to a language or religion. They either have monarchies, parliamentary systems or a presidential system, some being stronger than others. Border security would be tight due to terrorism and revolts by Naxalites.
Cricket would not have such a strong presence in the sub-continent as it does today, with only niche levels of society enjoying it as a leisure activity. Sports like football, hockey and basketball which have a wider global appeal, would have been even more popular, along with native games like kabaddi and gilli-danda.

https://www.indiatimes.com/culture/...country-this-would-be-india-today-243538.html
 
Last edited:
Poor old sod misses the Empire.


Do you still employ a punkawallah, maggot ?

Haw, haw........................haw.
 
The American Flag stands for "Liberty and Justice for all".

Does anybody believe that there's been Liberty and Justice for all African Americans over the last 200 years?

I wouldn't call the American Flag a 'symbol of hatred' but the flag surely didn't symbolize Liberty and Justice for African Americans.

Start by refusing to be a victim!
 
i think in context she was talking about how many times the American flag is used by racists and haters. And how right wingers who are so quick to judge any black person or democrat or liberal, never complain about nazi marches where the US flag is presented, or by those trump thugs who stormed our capitol.
 
i think in context she was talking about how many times the American flag is used by racists and haters. And how right wingers who are so quick to judge any black person or democrat or liberal, never complain about nazi marches where the US flag is presented, or by those trump thugs who stormed our capitol.

Didn't those who stormed the capitol take the advice of Cory Booker to get in the faces of congress? YES or NO?
 
n a fiery Fourth of July Facebook post, Utah’s Black Lives Matter Chapter declared the American flag "a symbol of hatred."

"When we Black Americans see this flag we know the person flying it is not safe to be around," the post reads. "When we see this flag we know the person flying it is a racist. When we see this flag we know that the person flying it lives in a different America than we do. When we see this flag, we question your intelligence. We know to avoid you. It is a symbol of hatred."

Chapter founder Lex Scott confirmed to Fox News Wednesday that her group had made the post to highlight how hate groups can allegedly "co-opt" the American flag without prompting similar blowback.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/black-lives-matter-utah-american-flag-symbol-hatred

wait, I thought it wasn't an organization.....how does it have chapters?.....
 
Scum of the Revolution
giphy.gif

Moon the asshole bigot... just a liberal shill moon is


You're a common-or-garden troll, Scum.


Haw, haw.............................haw.
 
equal education would equalize society more than studying how fucked up slavery and jim crow laws were. they were- but how long does it take to study that?
Politics fucks up education more than lack of money.

TBH, education should be a lifelong occupation of all adults, but as far as Fed taxpayer dollars go, just K-12.

As RWNJs always loooove to point out, the US averages the highest pay for student education but with mediocre results. The problem isn't money, it's access since some schools are very well funded and some schools are poorly funded.

Better educated students are more likely to graduate and become better taxpayers. Dropouts can too easily end up on welfare or prison. Cheaper and better, in the long run, to educate Americans so they become productive adult Americans.
 
what is it when five Dallas police officers are murdered at a BLM riot?......er "mostly peaceful protest"?....
It's murder and/or assault. Just like at the Insurrection. Anyone who doesn't have their head firmly up their own ass should be able to understand that point.
 
No. You make completely unfounded assumptions. I never suggested it's not a big deal. The point is that it is a big deal for all peoples all over the world. There is nothing unique about the U. S. There have been many big deals throughout history world-wide.

You seem to ignore these evils except in the U. S. People in the U. S. are not the only ones that matter.

You're deflecting. We're talking about America, not the world. Stop with the whitewashing and man up, Dude.
Answer my question:

Was there or was there not Liberty and Justice for All African-Americans In American history?
Anything other than a YES or NO answer is a deflection. Your avoidance of an answer speaks volumes.
 
Last edited:
The U.S. flag was not designed to represent any other people EXCEPT us EUROPEAN AMERICANS. This is OUR nation, and OURS ALONE. WE are the only TRUE AMERICANS. The African Americans, and Asians, and Indians, and Arabs, and Chinese, and Japanese, etc, are merely grafted in amongst us. They have their own flags and their own countries that represent them. If the blacks hate our flag and hate us white Americans so much, then they should get the hell out of our country, and go back to their native Africa, and to their brethren who sold them into slavery to us.

'We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all White Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness----

Congratulations Gomer. You are a fucking racist.
 
Don't see an explanation. It's OK though. I've learned that progs' and normal folks' brains are just wired differently.
E.g., in the mind of leftists:
Healthy diet = racism
White guys are racist because they were murdered (not to be confused with being murdered because they were racists).
Racist birds.
Voting for Gary Johnson for president was clearly racism.
I could go on.

Yeah, you could go on, if you enjoy incoherent rambling.
 
Yep. And they killed nearly 2000 innocent unsuspecting Americans. Storming the capitol killed no one (except only ONE of them was shot).

Remember Cory Booker's "call to action"? I'll remind you...

“Please don’t just come here today and then go home,” Booker told supporters at the National Conference on Ending Homelessness. “Go to the Hill today. Get up and, please, get up in the face of some congresspeople.”

https://thepoliticalinsider.com/cory-booker-get-up-in-face/

So when they listen to a sitting senator (your fucking senator) , you tards call it an insurrection. Fucking hypocrites.

It was nearly 3000 killed and 25,000 injured on 9/11. Trump's Insurrection killed 5. Next time, when they bring guns, there will be more.

No doubt you'll be happy, like the other RWNJs, when someone like Timothy McVeigh, murders over a hundred Americans by blowing up a Federal building. SYT calls that "collateral damage". Most of you assholes will be applauding with from your basements, but too cowardly to take to the streets with your weapons to attack the Feds, murder police and attempt to shred our Constitution.

5dx5qq.gif
5dx6xg.gif
 
Back
Top