BLM says "revolution has started" w/WI attack

Your committing reification fallacy.
Fallacy fallacy. No reification is occurring. France was never allied with the Nazis.
Alliances are rarely fully ubiquitous.
Nope. They are quite concrete. They either exist, or they don't.
The truth of it comes from actual facts.
Buzzword fallacy. A fact is not a proof nor a Universal Truth. Learn what 'fact' means.
We were indeed shot at landing our troops in France by some French authorities allied with the nazis.

Originally standing down for the nazi invasion does constitute an act of alliance. That one later does something does not then erase what was previously done.

They stood down for the nazi invasion and stood up against an allied landing and that doesn't in anyway suggest something, no partiality at all?

That they fought in the middle and end does not negate that they kissed in the beginning.

Some French authorities are NOT the government of France. Divisional error fallacy. France never had an alliance with Nazis.
 
Only if the police refuse to do what they are paid to do. In Florida, we don't have that problem yet.



That is why I am armed up. ;)

The police aren't everywhere, and in some places they no longer exist as a functioning police force thanks to defunding and dismantling by liberal city councils and mayors.

It is already a problem in Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, Chicago, Kenosha, and elsewhere.

So people are left to defend their own communities.
 
You can, but just another sock will appear.

I don't sock but I might make my own competing thread with the same title..

BTW, you clearly don't know me for sht and if you can't admit that, guess my name?

I have multiple +1 post thx from you. You clearly just triggered on "faggot." Should have guessed something from that toucan, but it's w/e. Clearly just as guilty(persay) of pursuing the tangent but I guess faggots just can't smell their own shit. Fragrance lube or something I'd hazard.
 
Nope. They are quite concrete. They either exist, or they don't.

That has to be the dumbest most never sht I've ever heard. Google proxy war. The frenemy of my frenemy is my frenemy. Not saying this is the mechanic I'm speaking of in the context of the short lived alliance between france and Germany but it certainly points to your lacking qualifications.

Nope. They are quite concrete. They either exist, or they don't.

Please, try to find something more naive to say.
 
This schmuck fool faggot couldn't even guess who "dommer" might have referred to in a context of Wisconsin prisons and execution. Couldn't even be bothered to Google.

Guess we won't get into Ed Geen or even Adam peeterson then.
 
Last edited:
I don't sock but I might make my own competing thread with the same title..
Go right ahead.
BTW, you clearly don't know me for sht and if you can't admit that, guess my name?
Since you have already admitted to derailing the thread, good luck in your competing thread.
I have multiple +1 post thx from you.
Irrelevant.
You clearly just triggered on "faggot."
Inversion fallacy. You are describing yourself.
Should have guessed something from that toucan, but it's w/e.
The icon is not a toucan. Obviously you don't know your birds.
Clearly just as guilty(persay) of pursuing the tangent but I guess faggots just can't smell their own shit. Fragrance lube or something I'd hazard.
You clearly have a problem with firewood.
 
That has to be the dumbest most never sht I've ever heard. Google proxy war. The frenemy of my frenemy is my frenemy. Not saying this is the mechanic I'm speaking of in the context of the short lived alliance between france and Germany but it certainly points to your lacking qualifications.



Please, try to find something more naive to say.

Non-English post. Try again.
 
False dichotomy fallacy. False authority fallacy.

You are not making a point. Void argument fallacy. Fallacy fallacy.

Not a false dichotomy fallacy. Two terms make up a reification fallacy. One, a subjective abstract and another that begs the first term's objective legitimacy.

Your mind seems hopelessly locked in a codification fallacy feedback loop. I won't bother with the rest. You already lost your shit with a simple "faggot" not even directed to you and in a context where you were far more guilty than myself.
 
Not a false dichotomy fallacy.
Yes it is.
Two terms make up a reification fallacy. One, a subjective abstract and another that begs the first term's objective legitimacy.
Fallacy fallacy. False dichotomy fallacy.
Your mind seems hopelessly locked in a codification fallacy feedback loop.
No such fallacy. Mockery. Denial of logic. Buzzword fallacy.
I won't bother with the rest.
Cliche fallacy.
You already lost your shit with a simple "faggot" not even directed to you and in a context where you were far more guilty than myself.
Hey...YOUR problem with firewood is YOURS.
 
Back
Top