Jake Starkey
Verified User
No, you did not. Your chemistry is in the mud puddle in the middle of the unpaved road you live on outside of Springfield.
Box Office: ‘Melania’ Heads for $8 Million Opening, the Best Showing in a Decade for a Doc
- Thread starter Grokmaster
- Start date
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
That slunt has been on my ignore list for a long time. What did he say this time?
No. Face masks hide identity and make it impossible to see who's committing abuses. Your logic is flawed.
No.
Fuck you.
Basically, he was trying to gaslight me like he usually does - first, "I didn't see what I thought I saw". Then when I threw his bullshit back in his face, unemotionally, he lost his shit. That post was him basically screaming at me, calling me a "nazi" blah blah blah. So he was frustrated, that I wasn't losing my cool, and that it was pretty clear I wasn't even close to buying his version of events.
It's how we're going to win - when they try to gaslight (i.e. "Alex Pretti was a terrorist who went into that situation intending to murder ICE agents") <--- when they try to pull something like that just laugh at them. If they see they've rattled me with their bullshit? Well, then I've lowered myself to their level and I won't do that.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Your logic is abysmal. You complained about face masks because other police don't wear them. I then pointed out that other police don't wear body armor, and you said you were nonetheless fine with the difference. You contradicted yourself.
Then you refused to simply acknowledge that you contradicted yourself and clarify. You apparently have no intention of engaging in any honest discussion on this topic.
You are so totally rational, and your love for your fellow man is off the charts.
When you're ready to debate honestly hit me up.
You know now I am not susceptible to your bullshit.
Body armor does not conceal one's identity.
Masks, combined with no name tags means no one knows who you are, therefore no incentive to behave legally.
That's it.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Is this another "My chemistry is great; your chemistry sucks" shit-slinging?
I'm in. Your chemistry is nonexistent. I'll prove it. You believe in ocean acidification ... specifically because you aren't aware that water evaporates. You probably can't even define unambiguously any part of your religious dogma.
Too funny.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
You're too late. That's my line. I tried. You forfeited and then blamed me.
When you are ready to discuss rationally and honestly, explain your contradiction and we can move on. Until then, you're stuck back at the starting gate.
You are the producer of booooooolsch't.
But it is something that differs from the rest of law enforcement, which was your argument before you pivoted, causing your forfeit.
Dial it back and address your own argument.
Let me know.
Tobytone
Verified User
Please, you can't debate for shit. You're an idiot, plain and simple. I tried 'debate' with you long ago, and it was a waste of time then just like it would be now. I've watched you flail against others ever since, same pattern every time. I just spelled out exactly what your tired game is, in my previous reply.
People like you make actual debate impossible. It's not all on you, you're just a faithful echo of the puppet master's you worship. When you call ICE 'Trump's Gestapo' or brand the officers who shot Good and Pretti as 'murderers,' you're not dropping some Lurchy hot take. You're reciting Democrat party lines word for word, screamed proudly and repeatedly by the party's most vile members. You're not thinking, you're doing your best impression of a parrot. That would be great if the scumbags you parrots weren't anti-American criminals that exploit you idiots to assist them while they rob everyone blind.
My point stands: how the hell is any sane adult supposed to debate someone this detached from basic reality? Do you seriously not see the difference between those incidents and actual murder? Apparently not. That leaves you either so immature you can't face the obvious truth, or so genuinely delusional you hear that bullshit and swallow it without a single brain cell firing in protest.
That's just one small example out of dozens why arguing with you is pointless. Understand?
Let me know.
Tobytone
Verified User
LOL, I think Lurchy's feelings are hurt by the realization that nobody came to his rescue. He really thinks his comments here would be missed. He might be just figuring out that his comments are virtually identical to the low IQ freak club on JPP. I have literally never seen a single argument by Lurchy that any random seventh grader couldn't top.@Tobytone He got the message
Tobytone
Verified User
Ohhh boy, now Lurchy pretends he wants to debate, lol. What a desperate loser. Lurchy, don't you think you should already be out on the road trying to sell a Kirby? You've tried the debate thing already, and the case is closed, you're a moron.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
I still plan on watching it on Prime when it comes out in a few weeks.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Gaslight or just so delusional they believe the shit falling out of their ass?
It's a basic question that's been asked before: If a person truly believes something that is false, such as "flat earth", are they lying when they advocate it? No, IMHO, but it does prove they are delusional AKA irrational.
Sybil falls directly into that category. He truly believes that stuff he posts.
Preach, brother. It's a little bit fun to be in control of their feeble minds.
Did you get spanked for this blatant rule violation, you stupid bitch? Let's continue reading.
Yeah, you are going to get some time off, my friend. You appear to really want it.