Now that Twitter no longer has an army of bot accounts to quickly like a retweet leftist talking points, so that the MSM could cite them as proof that leftist BS is popular and widely believed, the MSM has to rely on fake polling "data" to help push their false narratives, and OMG is it ever ridiculous.
As an example, here's polling "data" that is being circulate on Canada's alt-left media:
Even in Alberta's major cities, where leftists have occasionally won seats, Carney just gets booed when he appears in public
View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/3nFJ_CJ1kj0
In the last federal election, Conservatives got 63.5% of the popular vote in Alberta, and the Libs only got 28%.
en.wikipedia.org
So, despite the fact that Carney is roughly as popular as anal cancer, CBC has found polling data that has him ahead of Pierre Poilievre.
It's time to admit that Polling data is all BS, are elections BS too?
As an example, here's polling "data" that is being circulate on Canada's alt-left media:
- AI Overview
- Recent polling data shows a mixed picture, with some specific surveys indicating Mark Carney leading or competitive with Pierre Poilievre in parts of Alberta, while other regional trackers note that Poilievre still holds higher traditional favourability among conservative bases in the province
- Recent CBC News/Janet Brown Opinion Research polling indicates that Prime Minister Mark Carney has recorded higher approval ratings in Alberta than Premier Danielle Smith
Even in Alberta's major cities, where leftists have occasionally won seats, Carney just gets booed when he appears in public
In the last federal election, Conservatives got 63.5% of the popular vote in Alberta, and the Libs only got 28%.
2025 Canadian federal election in Alberta - Wikipedia
So, despite the fact that Carney is roughly as popular as anal cancer, CBC has found polling data that has him ahead of Pierre Poilievre.
It's time to admit that Polling data is all BS, are elections BS too?
