California Revokes First Amendment.

[AProudLefty]

DERP

(b)(1)A program participant, or an individual, entity or organization authorized to act on their behalf, may make a written demand to a person, business or association to not publicly post or publicly display, disclose or distribute on the internet the personal information or image of the program participant.

You dumbfuck.

Um that's called doxxing. Wow.

 

[Sailor]

Again, you have no clue what the bill is about.

It's about doxxing.

California already has long-standing criminal and civil anti-doxxing laws on the books.

• Criminal Doxxing Law (California Penal Code § 653.2): This long-standing statute makes it a misdemeanor to electronically distribute someone’s personal identifying information (including addresses or digital images) without consent. It applies if the person acts with the intent to place the victim in fear and for the purpose of causing unwanted physical contact or harassment by a third party. Violators face up to one year in county jail and fines up to $1,000. [1, 2]
• Civil Doxxing Law (California Civil Code § 1708.89): Enacted under AB 1979, this law allows victims of doxxing to sue their offenders directly in civil court for financial damages and to obtain immediate court injunctions ordering the content to be taken down. [1, 2]

 

[Yakuda]

Is that important?

You think so. Post #3. Do you pay attention at all?

 

[Into the Night]

Gavin Newsom today signed Assembly Bill 2624, which outlaws journalists exposing fraud or printing stories critical of democrats and organizations protected by democrats. Ending the long tradition of freedom of the press in America.

Without respect for the United States Constitution, Newsom and the politburo in California outlawed a free and independent press as a prelude to ending freedom of speech and freedom of religion.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2091389975073816640

View: https://x.com/SenStricklandCA/status/2091389975073816640?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2091389975073816640%7Ctwgr%5E7c7399353f550c0c83b60cccacde54d5a6c14eb1%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftownhall.com%2Fnews%2Fjosephchalfant%2F2026%2F08%2F23%2Fgavin-newsom-signs-the-stop-nick-shirley-act-into-law-n2681740

The Constitution of the United States does not apply here. King Newsom is not the federal government.
The Constitution of the State of California would apply, if California was still a State (Article 1 $2).

King Newsom long ago discarded that constitution.

The current form of government of the California is dictatorship.

 

[Into the Night]

wow.

fucking pathetic.

trump Zionists arent much better on free speech these days, however.

Magick Words (zionist, free speech).
Illiteracy: Proper nouns not capitalized. Beginning of sentences not capitalized. Missing apostrophe. Buzzwords.

Go learn English.

 

[Earl]

The part that criminalizes a free press.

The "Stop Nick Shirley" law specifically targets journalists who expose fraud, particularly fraud ties to government (democrat) operations. democrats acted to end freedom of the press after independent journalist Shirley exposed massive, pervasive, and state government condoned fraud in hospice and elder care.

Showing a "hospice" operation where there are no patients, no equipment, no trained staff, isn't "doxxing" as Lefty is lying, it's reporting. It's investigative journalism that is the right of every American.

{
California Sen. Tony Strickland also accused Newsom and Democratic lawmakers of attacking basic constitutional protections rather than welcoming scrutiny of government spending.

“It goes against everything we have here in America, but with the vague language, it’s shutting down speech and the freedom of the press,” Strickland told The Post. “Every person and every taxpayer, every person should be able to ask questions and hold our government accountable.”}

Californians torch Gavin Newsom’s chilling ‘Stop Nick Shirley Act’ — teeing up huge clash with feds

California Gov. Gavin Newsom has signed AB 2624, expanding privacy protections for immigration-service workers while critics warn the law could affect investigative journalism and free-speech right…

nypost.com

Because this flagrantly violates the 1st Amendment, the courts will shut it down.

What is shocking though is that Chairman Newsom and the Politburo in California would be this bold. This is Hitler and Stalin level totalitarianism. What the ruling Communist party has decreed is that they will put anyone who questions how they spend or embezzle tax monies in jail.

Indeed…excellent

 

[Into the Night]

actually... the biggest idiots of Zionism are the American Christian traitors like you.

Magick Words (Zionism, American Christian, traitor).
Illiteracy: Beginning of sentence not capitalized. Ellipses used for comma.

Go learn English.

 

[Into the Night]

You support ending freedom of the press?

Of course he does. He thinks censorship actually works.

Of course you do, Uber Alles democrat.

Pinch a democrat, a Nazi screams.

 

[AProudLefty]

You think so. Post #3. Do you pay attention at all?

Wether Nick doxxed anyone or not has no bearing to how the bill was written.

 

[Into the Night]

@Jarod and @Walt - do you agree with your fellow Communist Lefty that the 1st Amendment is a hindrance to party goals and must be gotten rid of?

Do you think federal courts will uphold California's action in ending constitutional rights?

This is beyond any court.

 

[Yakuda]

Wether Nick doxxed anyone or not has no bearing to how the bill was written.

Of course it does. You didnt read it did you?

 

[Into the Night]

Obviously you oppose civil rights.

This LAW ends freedom of the press.

Fair warning, this is from the United States Constitution, you may break out in hives or have convulsions if you read it:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

It doesn't say "unless the press exposes fraud by people tied to the ruling party."

King Newsom is not Congress or any part of the federal government.

 

[Into the Night]

I think red herring fallacies are a fallacy for a reason.

You can't defend the frontal assault on fundamental constitutional rights, so you start in with gibberish.

What do you expect. LeftNut only posts random phrases he heard somewhere.

What do you think the ruling Junta in California will do when the federal courts strike this down -

Probably nothing.

tomorrow or the next day? Will they ignore the courts as they have ignored the Constitution?

Yup. Newsom long ago discarded the Constitution of the State of California.

Will they attempt to secede, perhaps attempt to join Communist China?

They already have seceded. I call it the SDTC now (Socialist Dictatorship of the Territory of California).
For some reason they still have representation in Congress.
They do seem to be allied with Communist China.

 

[AProudLefty]

Of course it does. You didnt read it did you?

Immigration nonprofit workers gained state protections from doxxing and targeted harassment after Gov. Gavin Newsom on Saturday signed a bill that expanded California’s Safe at Home program to include them.

Newsom signs immigrant protection bill derided by GOP as the ‘Stop Nick Shirley Act’

Immigration nonprofit workers gained state protections from doxxing and targeted harassment after Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill expanding California’s Safe at Home program to include the...

www.sfchronicle.com

 

[Into the Night]

That will be up to the federal courts to decide.

Do you think they will support ending the 1st Amendment to protect democrat fraud rackets?

The 1st amendment of the Constitution of the United States does not apply here.

 

[Into the Night]

The glaring violation of the 1st Amendment. "Shall not infringe," Comrade.

The 1st amendment does not apply here.

 

[Yakuda]

Immigration nonprofit workers gained state protections from doxxing and targeted harassment after Gov. Gavin Newsom on Saturday signed a bill that expanded California’s Safe at Home program to include them.

Newsom signs immigrant protection bill derided by GOP as the ‘Stop Nick Shirley Act’

Immigration nonprofit workers gained state protections from doxxing and targeted harassment after Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill expanding California’s Safe at Home program to include the...

www.sfchronicle.com

So you didnt read the bill. got it

 

[Into the Night]

​

Could this recently-litigated case in a different jurisdiction be considered as relevant?

---

Yes, it is relevant as persuasive authority on First Amendment limits, though not controlling.

The 1st amendment does not apply here.

 

[Into the Night]

That's a blatant lie.

Freedom of the press is one of the key components to the first.

Infringing freedom of the press is a blatant violation of the Constitution.

The 1st amendment does not apply here.

 

[AProudLefty]

So you didnt read the bill. got it

Did you?

Here: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB2624