Can Omarosa even read?. Graduate of two HBCUs

Late 20s.... young is relative.



Did you read the story you linked to? Did you believe it countered the notion that men tend to be the beneficiaries of affirmative action at private colleges (the point I made)?

(white) women were the biggest beneficiary for decades of AA. Yes I read the story I posted. Again, this is known information. Ask the black posters on the board who has benefited the most from AA, they'll tell you the same thing. They ought to do away with this focus on race and gender and make it more about economics.
 
(white) women were the biggest beneficiary for decades of AA. Yes I read the story I posted. Again, this is known information. Ask the black posters on the board who has benefited the most from AA, they'll tell you the same thing. They ought to do away with this focus on race and gender and make it more about economics.

Because your economic system has nothing to do with race or gender.
 
The deep hostility that African-Americans harbor for Manigault Newman stems largely from her defense of the president or her public silence as he repeatedly attacked the American citizenship of former President Barack Obama; insulted various minority groups and described some African nations as "shithole" countries. He has also insulted prominent blacks like U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters and NBA superstar LeBron James, said that "many sides" are to blame for the violence at last year's white nationalist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, and ripped African-American athletes for protesting racial injustice.

As the highest-profile African-American on the White House staff, she pushed back on accusations that Trump was racist. She once told PBS' "Frontline," ''Every critic, every detractor will have to bow down under President Trump."


ABC News
 
(white) women were the biggest beneficiary for decades of AA. Yes I read the story I posted. Again, this is known information. Ask the black posters on the board who has benefited the most from AA, they'll tell you the same thing. They ought to do away with this focus on race and gender and make it more about economics.

Both race-based and sex-based AA need to end. There is no giant conspiracy holding down blacks and women. They just don't have the ability white men have. That's why they have always been failures.
 
You know what would be a really good interview ...

I'd like to know what Omarosa's husband, John Allen Newman thinks of Donald Trump calling his wife a Dog.

... Hummm, as a matter of fact, I wonder what anyone here on this forum would say if any Man called their Wife a Dog.


Omarosa is a dog. Like mooch she's the size of a defensive tackle and almost certainly a tranny.
 
FACT IS...it is entirely possible for cultural bias to impact on the test results you mentioned...and still have all black-Americans (that is capitalized, you know) come in last and Asian-Americans do just fine.


Hey einstein. Of course it's possible. Hell - it's possible the sun will blow up tmrw. But it's very unlikely and the fact that black-americans do so poorly on standardized tests while asian-americans do so well makes it very likely the tests are NOT culturally biased. Like 99% certain. THINK, white-hating racist.
 
Hey einstein. Of course it's possible. Hell - it's possible the sun will blow up tmrw. But it's very unlikely and the fact that black-americans do so poorly on standardized tests while asian-americans do so well makes it very likely the tests are NOT culturally biased. Like 99% certain. THINK, white-hating racist.

You said "proven false" jerkoff.

Now you are saying "like 99% certain"...WHICH IS THE SAME AS SAYING IT IS NOT PROVEN FALSE.

Get your head out of your ass...and build up the ethical wherewithal to acknowledge you fucked up.
 
Yes I read the story I posted.

I'm unclear then on why you posted it. As you should be able to see, it does not counter the point I made (that men, not women, are more likely to be the beneficiary of affirmative action in college admissions). You seem to be trying to gloss over that by focusing instead on a discussion of affirmative action for white women in the workplace -- a subject that is, obviously, a complete non sequitur in response to a discussion of a black woman's academic accomplishments, which, as you recall, is what was being discussed.
 
I'm unclear then on why you posted it. As you should be able to see, it does not counter the point I made (that men, not women, are more likely to be the beneficiary of affirmative action in college admissions). You seem to be trying to gloss over that by focusing instead on a discussion of affirmative action for white women in the workplace -- a subject that is, obviously, a complete non sequitur in response to a discussion of a black woman's academic accomplishments, which, as you recall, is what was being discussed.

White women in the workplace? Not sure where that's coming from. We were taking about college admissions and for decades white women were the largest recipient. Now Universities want to reverse that? I said the focus should be on the economics of a student more than their gender. We don't need AA for gender.

Edit: I posted it because you asked for proof that white women were the biggest beneficiary of AA
 
Because it's a fact?

What makes you think it's a fact? Could you be specific, please, about that data that led you to that conclusion? Since the link you provided doesn't support it, I'm wondering what led you to the conclusion. Thanks.
 
Back
Top