Chairman Enrique Torrio

Is the Chairman of Proud Boys a White Supremacist?


  • Total voters
    8
Why does it matter if her beliefs are important to her? Because her beliefs are antithetical to a secular humanist society. She'll fight women's rights and civil rights because "muh religion."

Hold on just a second.

When was it decided we were a ‘secular humanist society’? I must have missed that vote.
 
Of course, then you have to ask if it's the standard definition or the stupid definition from critical race theory.

I take 'words' at their face value. But, ... the 'action' will tell you the real story. (Like appointing a Religious Cult Member to the Supreme Court)
 
I wonder how many news cycles it will take for idiots in the business to figure that out?

Isn’t it amazing how clueless the media can be?

A Chris Wallace literally gets paid to research/consume media and etc. No doubt he’s a millionaire. Yet he blurts out “Proud Boys” to Trump as an example of white supremacy. Yet we can sit around in our spare time and learn that the PB maybe isn’t the best example of white supremacy.

And do it in a matter of minutes, literally.
 
I knew that and I know what secular humanism is.

I wanted to know when the vote was because I missed it.

'Culture War'. We're watching it play out right now in front of our very own eyes.

--->Installation of a Religious Cult Member on to the Supreme Court.
 
'Culture War'. We're watching it play out right now in front of our very own eyes.

--->Installation of a Religious Cult Member on to the Supreme Court.

I can label Secular Humanism a cult lol.

Secular Humanism is a cult. See how easy that was?
 
I can label Secular Humanism a cult lol.

Secular Humanism is a cult. See how easy that was?

I support your Right of thinking whatever you want to think.
Here's the actual definition though:
"Secular humanism is a philosophy or life stance that embraces human reason, secular ethics, and philosophical naturalism while specifically rejecting religious dogma, supernaturalism, and superstition as the basis of morality and decision making. Wikipedia"

See the 'human reasoning' part. That's kind of important.
See the 'rejecting religious dogma, supernaturalism, and superstition' part. That's important too ... and is what gives the Religious types the redass.
 
I support your Right of thinking whatever you want to think.
Here's the actual definition though:
"Secular humanism is a philosophy or life stance that embraces human reason, secular ethics, and philosophical naturalism while specifically rejecting religious dogma, supernaturalism, and superstition as the basis of morality and decision making. Wikipedia"

See the 'human reasoning' part. That's kind of important.
See the 'rejecting religious dogma, supernaturalism, and superstition' part. That's important too ... and is what gives the Religious types the redass.

I reject philosophical naturalism—it is, in fact, a dogma; and nowhere, is it written that our laws must comport with it.
 
Both Trump and the linked article know they are white supremacist activists who have violently attacked protesters. Why else would Trump bring up the Proud Boys when asked about white supremacists?

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/22/nyregion/proud-boys-antifa-sentence.html
Both defendants were convicted in August of attempted gang assault, attempted assault and riot. Seven others charged in the incident pleaded guilty. One defendant is awaiting trial.

In court on Tuesday, a prosecutor, Joshua Steinglass recommended that Justice Dwyer sentence Mr. Hare and Mr. Kinsman to five years in prison, saying “violence meant to intimidate and silence” should have no place in society.

He cited a history of conflict between the Proud Boys — who are generally supporters of President Trump and disdain liberals, feminists and Islam — and Antifa, a loose affiliation of left-leaning activists.


If they are sentenced to prison, they'll have time to acquire an assortment of Aryan tattoos.
 
I reject philosophical naturalism—it is, in fact, a dogma; and nowhere, is it written that our laws must comport with it.

"In philosophy, naturalism is the idea or belief that only natural laws and forces operate in the universe. Adherents of naturalism assert that natural laws are the rules that govern the structure and behavior of the natural universe, that the changing universe at every stage is a product of these laws. Wikipedia"

A core difference between the 2 competing parties in the Cultural War.
 
"In philosophy, naturalism is the idea or belief that only natural laws and forces operate in the universe. Adherents of naturalism assert that natural laws are the rules that govern the structure and behavior of the natural universe, that the changing universe at every stage is a product of these laws. Wikipedia"

A core difference between the 2 competing parties in the Cultural War.

It’s a dogma. It’s an -ism.

Where does it say our laws must reflect philosophical naturalism?
 
Most members are white men who identify as or sympathize with white supremacists, kinda like how the GOP has a few token minorities, even though 75% of the party is racist assholes.

So, Mikey, you have proof of this.

Post it.
 
Last edited:
It’s a dogma. It’s an -ism.

Where does it say our laws must reflect philosophical naturalism?

"Dogma is an official system of principles or doctrines of a religion, such as Roman Catholicism, or the positions of a philosopher or of a philosophical school such as Stoicism. In the pejorative sense, dogma refers to enforced decisions, such as those of aggressive political interests or authorities.Wikipedia"

No Laws say that as far as I know. The Space Program is based on a 'Natural Universe'. Scientists use 'Natural Laws'.
 
Back
Top