Chuck U Schumer bends the knee on judges

Thanks for helping me show what a pathetic old coward, you've decided to be. :palm:

Instead of emoting, can't you give a logical response to the question or are you scared to actually make a commitment?

My name is not Francis.

You are my pet.

Here is how I think of you:



images
 
My name is Francis and I can't stop thinking of you.


Thanks for helping me show what a pathetic old coward, you've decided to be. :palm:

Instead of emoting, can't you give a logical response to the question or are you scared to actually make a commitment?

If a pregnant woman wants to terminate her pregnancy...she should be able to do it without having to deal with cavemen like you.

A perfectly good reason for wanting to terminate a pregnancy...IS WANTING TO TERMINATE IT.

YOU do not get to decide what is reasonable and what is not.


Oh, the irony!

You appear to be ignoring my question, to your post.

I wonder why that is??

But then, if she doesn't want to; why should the father be expected to support and pay for her decision??
 
Thanks for helping me show what a pathetic old coward, you've decided to be. :palm:

Instead of emoting, can't you give a logical response to the question or are you scared to actually make a commitment?

My name is not Francis.

You are my pet.

Here is how I think of you:



images
 
Ask freedumb, it's his hypothetical.

I say they are both responsible, 50-50. If neither wants a baby it's the only way that makes sense outside of abstinence.

If it's a 50-50 for the two involved in making the baby, why is it those of us that aren't either 50 responsible for supporting the baby one of the 50s chooses to have when the other 50 isn't doing his part financially.

You can answer with the typical left wing nonsense or continue to hide like a coward. Neither one is a favorable choice for you.
 
No argument but who has to spread their legs? Seems like the woman is the deciding factor. BTW you do know the sell rubbers to women also?

Oh, using the CFM argument... she didn't have to spread her legs. How about he could have said no when she did?

I'm not surprised at your answer, though. Just another man who thinks the woman should be responsible when it takes two to tango.
 
Oh, using the CFM argument... she didn't have to spread her legs. How about he could have said no when she did?

I'm not surprised at your answer, though. Just another man who thinks the woman should be responsible when it takes two to tango.

Why should be say no when her answer to his request was yes. Did she think he was kidding?

As far as it taking two to tango, those of us that didn't dance with her quite often get the bill for her getting on the dance floor.
 
Do Muslims want 'Sharia Law'?

Guess what, ... Christians want the same thing.

I would guess the first thing would be to roll back the present Abortion Laws. Arresting women for murder and having public executions wouldn't be unreasonable.
'Gay Marriage' would be overturned. Sodomy Laws would be enforced with sever punishments for Offenders.
Witchcraft would be a Crime.

Yes, that means your friend Owl would be arrested and burned at the stake alive, there WILL BE consequences!

Nobody (rational) believes such wildly exaggerated predictions. This is as crazy as those on the right which claim Sharia law exists in the U. S.
 
Oh, using the CFM argument... she didn't have to spread her legs. How about he could have said no when she did?

I'm not surprised at your answer, though. Just another man who thinks the woman should be responsible when it takes two to tango.

So the truth bothers you. Let me fill you in on a little secret. For 9 months men work on getting out of that thing between a woman's legs. And the rest of their lives trying to get in one. Clear?
 
Hmmm...Changed your "tune"? Now it's 50/50? I'd say ask the woman if she's on birth control, if not, "pull out."

My tune's always been the same, both are responsible equally. Why did all of you suggest that BC is the woman's responsibility? As in these comments:

"...why did the woman get pregnant in the first place? Birth control products are inexpensive, effective, and plentiful. So you are defending a woman's right to use abortion as an alternative birth control method. There is no reason why a woman should have an unwanted pregnancy. The only excuse is the birth control method used failed then an abortion is understandable."

"Not one true justification for abortion other than a woman's ego."

"But then, if she doesn't want to; why should the father be expected to support and pay for her decision??"

Not a single remark about a man's responsibility to take precautions.
 
So the truth bothers you. Let me fill you in on a little secret. For 9 months men work on getting out of that thing between a woman's legs. And the rest of their lives trying to get in one. Clear?

You've already given your misogynistic opinion, no need to get crude also.
 
Back
Top