CNN sued AGAIN for fabricating fake news

I use the two to the left, two to the right method initially in evaluating their stories. If the story is fact checking a conservative move their score two towards "true." If the story is about a Leftist, move their score two towards "false."

So, a Right oriented story rated as "Completely false" or the like becomes "Partially true," while a Left oriented story rated "True" becomes "Partially true" in the same way.

This becomes apparent when you read their op ed columns critically. For those they disagree with, they take anything not absolutely provable as "true" and say it is a "lie," "completely false," etc. For those they agree with they go the other direction. A complete lie is brushed off as "misspoke," or something like "there was a bit of truth in it," and the like. Much of the time this is so obvious it hurts to read it. You wonder how anyone could be that unobjective and oblivious to what they are writing about.
 
When did a lawsuit constitute proof especially when it is the accused filing it? This is another right fake thread.
 
Nerdberg said:
When did a lawsuit constitute proof especially when it is the accused filing it? This is another right fake thread.
Click to expand...

WTF are you talking about?

Don't you know that CNN had to pay Nick Sandmann millions of dollars for their mischaracterization of his encounter with Nathan Phillips?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/01/07/nick-sandmann-cnn-confirms-settlement-covington-catholic-student/2837478001/

Sandmann also sued NBC and the Washington Post.
 
Legion said:
I like to watch them "confirm" and "verify" each other's stories.
Click to expand...

And then get proven wrong at every turn. Notice how silent Politifact was when the cancel culture mob came for Planned Parenthood's genocidal racist founder, after Politifact spent years telling us it was all just right-wing lies?

:rofl2:
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I use the two to the left, two to the right method initially in evaluating their stories. If the story is fact checking a conservative move their score two towards "true." If the story is about a Leftist, move their score two towards "false."

So, a Right oriented story rated as "Completely false" or the like becomes "Partially true," while a Left oriented story rated "True" becomes "Partially true" in the same way.

This becomes apparent when you read their op ed columns critically. For those they disagree with, they take anything not absolutely provable as "true" and say it is a "lie," "completely false," etc. For those they agree with they go the other direction. A complete lie is brushed off as "misspoke," or something like "there was a bit of truth in it," and the like. Much of the time this is so obvious it hurts to read it. You wonder how anyone could be that unobjective and oblivious to what they are writing about.
Click to expand...

99% true conservative stories get rated "mostly false." :bs:
 
Nordberg said:
When did a lawsuit constitute proof especially when it is the accused filing it? This is another right fake thread.
Click to expand...

If the plaintiff has no case, defendants tell them to piss off. Need any other common sense realities of adulthood spelled out for you?

:laugh:
 
Micawber said:
Baseless suit. Republican scum abuse of process. Disgraceful scum. You all need to die
Click to expand...

Translation: Baseless denial and blind rage. Baseless denial and blind rage. Baseless denial and blind rage. Baseless denial and blind rage. Baseless denial and blind rage.

Need a tissue, crybaby? :crybaby:
 
Arminius said:


As well he shouldn't. That's actually the whole point of the thread. Suing them is the only way these lying sleazebags will learn. :nodyes:
Click to expand...
Fox has never learned...they sued and are allowed the right to lie! It’s why people are foolish if the go to cable outlets for news, it’s commentary on the news. If you view it in this respect, it is entertainment. I view cable news for entertainment, I go else where for news.
 
Arminius said:
Notice how silent Politifact was when the cancel culture mob came for Planned Parenthood's genocidal racist founder, after Politifact spent years telling us it was all just right-wing lies?
Click to expand...

I did, indeed.

But they'd declared the truth "False" again" the last time I checked.
 
Arminius said:
Translation: Baseless denial and blind rage. Baseless denial and blind rage. Baseless denial and blind rage. Baseless denial and blind rage. Baseless denial and blind rage. Need a tissue, crybaby?
Click to expand...

McSlobber is ready to support "secession", you know.

Mcslobber said:
I will support secession if Trump* supposedly wins. I won't live under a cult of morons who worship a criminal. It will be like the Jewish people fleeing Nazi Germany.
Click to expand...
 
Legion said:
I did, indeed.

But they'd declared the truth "False" again" the last time I checked.
Click to expand...

When your partisan DNC "fact-checkers" have been caught in more lies than CNN, they cease to be fact-checkers. They become universally recognized as desperate attempts by those who cannot defend their bullshit to dress up their falsehoods with masks of authority.

giphy.webp
 
Arminius said:
Let's face it. CNN is tabloid trash at this point. THIS TIME this TV news version of the National Enquirer is being sued for lying about Alan Derschowitz. I keep saying it. Until these communist lunatics force the shooting to start, their blatantly criminal and liable scumbag conduct is best address with lawsuits. Nick Sandmann knows.

:nodyes:

Dershowitz sues CNN over impeachment defense: 'They made a deliberate decision to doctor the tape'
Click to expand...

Cheap News Network doesn't get
 
Arminius said:
When your partisan DNC "fact-checkers" have been caught in more lies than CNN, they cease to be fact-checkers. They become universally recognized as desperate attempts by those who cannot defend their bullshit to dress up their falsehoods with masks of authority.
Click to expand...

Exactly.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top