Covid Jab Follies: The more you know.
- Thread starter Taichiliberal
- Start date
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
Oh dear god. You neophytes with degrees in human biology from YouTube University would be hilarious if it wasn’t for this sort of profound and willful ignorance cost people their lives.
ivermectin has been conclusively debunked as an effective treatment or prevention strategy for COVID-19 by the global scientific community. Major Health Organizations like the WHO, FDA, CDC, NIH, et., have thoroughly debunked Ivermectin for use in treating COVID 19. Even Merk the original manufacturer recommended against its use outside of clinical trials due to lack of efficacy.
The consensus rests on clear, data-driven reasons established through rigorous, peer-reviewed clinical trials.
These are scientific reasons why Ivermectin failed as a treatment for COVID 19:
Unacheivable invitro dosages. Initial interest sparked from laboratory (in vitro) cell-culture studies showing antiviral activity. However research
highlighted that achieving the same antiviral effect in humans requires a drug concentration up to 50 to 100 times higher than what is safe. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11918548/
No Reduction in Hospitalization: The large-scale TOGETHER Randomized Clinical Trial, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, evaluated ivermectin against a placebo. It found that ivermectin did not lower the incidence of hospital admission or prolonged emergency department observation. [1, 2, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8810517/
No Impact on Recovery Speed: The multi-site ACTIV-6 Trial, published in JAMA, evaluated mild-to-moderate COVID-19 patients. It concluded there was no statistically significant difference in recovery time or death prevention between ivermectin and a placebo. https://www.kumc.edu/about/news/news-archive/jama-ivermectin-study.html
Ineffective in Vaccinated Populations: The PRINCIPLE Trial by the University of Oxford specifically tracked ivermectin's performance in community settings. Investigators confirmed that ivermectin completely lacked meaningful benefits in altering recovery or hospital outcomes. https://www.principletrial.org/news...cks-meaningful-benefits-in-covid-19-treatment
Flawed or Fraudulent Early Data: Early "pro-ivermectin" meta-analyses heavily relied on small studies and preprints that were later retracted. As documented in a Nature Journal report, key foundational papers (such as the Elgazzar preprint) were withdrawn due to widespread data plagiarism, fabrications, and structural flaws. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02081-w
And if that isn’t enough here’s some additional links to peer reviewed sources that debunk Ivermectin’s efficacy as a treatment for COVID-19.
Ivermectin shown ineffective in treating COVID-19, according to multi-site study including KU Medical Center
Results of the study of the antiparasitic medication, once a much-discussed potential treatment for COVID-19, were published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
News: A large study finds that ivermectin... (The New York Times) - Behind the headlines - NLM
(The New York Times) A large study finds that ivermectin does not reduce risk of Covid-19 hospitalization.. Associated research findings from the National Library of Medicine.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
New study shows ivermectin lacks meaningful benefits in COVID-19 treatment — Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences | University of Oxford
New research led by the University of Oxford has concluded that the antiparasitic drug ivermectin does not provide clinically meaningful benefits for treating COVID-19 in a largely vaccinated population.
Frontiers | Ivermectin and the Integrity of Healthcare Evidence During COVID-19
The COVID-19 pandemic has been characterized by a lack of clear evidence to guide healthcare professionals, the public and policy-makers. The resulting uncer...
www.frontiersin.org
But hey, who am I to tell you to research the actual science as I’m pretty sure that all you need is a handful of cranks to express opinions not based on the scientific data to support your political group think.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Bottom line: you have a full court press of "debunking" despite positive results in clinical trials. But since there is no approval for general use, any civilians ir doctors stating positive are just "anecdotal" and to be ignored. Yet previously respected medical scientists warning of long term negative cardio effects are discredited, and there is no public tracking of folk who die from cardiac problems (with no personal/family history) as to whether they were jabbed or not.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8248252/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8875435/
.
The covid vax would not have been approved under pre-pandemic standards. But now any and all reputable research that is not on the bandwagon is ignored.
I'm here because Ivermectin was pivotal in ending my month long hospitalization due to Covid. I get a kick out of people telling me different based on their beliefs.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8248252/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8875435/
.
The covid vax would not have been approved under pre-pandemic standards. But now any and all reputable research that is not on the bandwagon is ignored.
I'm here because Ivermectin was pivotal in ending my month long hospitalization due to Covid. I get a kick out of people telling me different based on their beliefs.
Last edited:
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Post #752. Deal with it.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
No stupid. I laugh at your inability to debate facts logically and honestly without memes.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
And the Maga troll does EXACTLY as predicted. No point in wasting more time on this fool.
