Dan Bilzerian (R) wants to ‘kill Israelis’ and thinks Judaism is ‘terrible.’ Now he’s running for Congress.

QP! said:
A false dilemma fallacy occurs when an argument presents a complex situation as having only two extreme choices while ignoring other valid alternatives. Also known as a false dichotomy or "black-and-white" thinking, this oversimplification forces a choice between two options where a middle ground or spectrum of possibilities actually exists. [1, 2, 3]
Click to expand...
Is there a middle ground between killing an infant or not killing an infant (up to birth), Kewpie Doll?
 
Earl said:
Is there a middle ground between killing an infant or not killing an infant (up to birth), Kewpie Doll?
Click to expand...
There is a middle ground between "support" and "condemn" which is the discussion you are now desperate to change since you admitted you were wrong.

A person in a community can go to a city counsel meeting and say "I am not one who supports the new stadium being built here. I do not think it is needed. But if others vote for it and it wins and is built, i won't condemn it. I realize not everyone has to agree with me'.

And if Earl is at that same city counsel meeting and saying 'you must condemn it being built or we will mark you down as supporting it' i know he would be laughed out of the meeting as the idiot he is.
 
Earl said:
AI Overview ... When repeatedly pressed to condemn the phrase "globalize the intifada," Zohran Mamdani initially stated it was not language he used himself, but declined to explicitly condemn it or police speech.

If you do not condemn something, you support it.

If someone says, "I support baby killing," and someone refuses to condemn it... as most Democratic/Socialist/Communists do...until birth...it will soon be after birth, then they support baby killing.
Click to expand...
That's not a quote, Son.
 
QP! said:
There is a middle ground between "support" and "condemn" which is the discussion you are now desperate to change since you admitted you were wrong.

A person in a community can go to a city counsel meeting and say "I am not one who supports the new stadium being built here. I do not think it is needed. But if others vote for it and it wins and is built, i won't condemn it. I realize not everyone has to agree with me'.

And if Earl is at that same city counsel meeting and saying 'you must condemn it being built or we will mark you down as supporting it' i know he would be laughed out of the meeting as the idiot he is.
Click to expand...
Is there a middle ground between killing an infant or not killing an infant (up to birth), Kewpie Doll?

I don't recall posting about a city counsel meeting, Kewpie Doll.

It was about condemning global intifada...or not condemning it.

Try harder. Watch out for those lower case "i's," Kewpie Doll.
 
Earl said:
Is there a middle ground between killing an infant or not killing an infant (up to birth), Kewpie Doll?

I don't recall posting about a city counsel meeting, Kewpie Doll.

It was about condemning global intifada...or not condemning it.

Try harder.
Click to expand...
You already admitted he has never said he supports the intifada. You posted a quote proving he has not.

So what are you trying so hard to establish here?
 
QP! said:
You already admitted he has never said he supports the intifada. You posted a quote proving he has not.

So what are you trying so hard to establish here?
Click to expand...
If someone is accused of supporting global intifada and refuses to condemn it, Kewpie Doll...

Try harder...you are committing the sin of...boredom.
 
For the record, if someone accused me of supporting the global intifada, I would vehemently deny it...and perhaps send about 10 rounds at the accuser.
 
Earl said:
"Preferable" refers to the shooters.
Click to expand...

OIC. On the other hand, an armor-piercing round has the capability to inflict fatal wounds on several leftists if you wait until you've enfiladed the targets.

Waste not, ...
 
Earl said:
If someone is accused of supporting global intifada and refuses to condemn it, Kewpie Doll...

Try harder...you are committing the sin of...boredom.
Click to expand...
Earl : YOU REFUSE TO CONDEMN THE NEW STADIUM SO YOU SUPPORT IT!!!!

Everyone else : points and laughs at Earl's idiocy.


---

There is a middle ground between "support" and "condemn" which is the discussion you are now desperate to change since you admitted you were wrong.

A person in a community can go to a city counsel meeting and say "I am not one who supports the new stadium being built here. I do not think it is needed. But if others vote for it and it wins and is built, i won't condemn it. I realize not everyone has to agree with me'.

And if Earl is at that same city counsel meeting and saying 'you must condemn it being built or we will mark you down as supporting it' i know he would be laughed out of the meeting as the idiot he is.
 
Diogenes said:
OIC. On the other hand, an armor-piercing round has the capability to inflict fatal wounds on several leftists if you wait until you've enfiladed the targets.

Waste not, ...
Click to expand...
I've always loved enfiladed targets...it's cheaper for the loads.
 
As Earl continues that every single situation we face in our lives there are only two options of either 'condemn' or 'support', we can all read his posts and understand how deeply stupid he is.
 
A few years ago when Notre Dame went up in flames, Many Jews were not unhappy , unfortunately it is has been rebuilt



In June 1242, roughly 12,000 handwritten manuscript copies of the Talmud were publicly burned in Paris near the Notre-Dame Cathedral. This destruction followed the 1240 Disputation of Paris, where rabbis were forced to defend their holy texts against Christian charges of blasphemy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top