Democratic "Socialists" Reveal Soviet Style Platform, Further Dimming the Line Between Them and Communism

[Grokmaster]

The continuing communist-style policies of the DSA are glaringly illustrated in their new platform, which seeks to eliminate the US Senate, the SCOTUS, and Presidency, while establishing an all-powerful "Politburo" in the US House.

Anyone who has actually read "The Social Contract" (Rousseau, 1762) , and "The Communist Manifesto" (Marx, Engels, etal, 1848) can easily discern the nearly identical desire to consolidate power in a central body, despite their continuing claims of no relation to communism, while touting a blatantly Soviet-esque desire to destroy 2/3+ of the US government.

Americans had best take heed of these power-hungry hucksters, as their "vision" is nothing short of backdoor Bolshevism....which would destroy the greatest Constitutional republic in the history of the human race.

Ignore the pretenses otherwise....

Democratic Socialists of America’s new platform calls for abolishing ICE and the U.S. Senate​

Democratic Socialists of America’s new platform calls for abolishing ICE and the U.S. Senate

The Democratic Socialists of America has released an updated platform that calls for a sweeping remake of the political system, including eliminating the U.S. Senate and abolishing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

www.washingtontimes.com

 

[Ross Dolan]

The fucking Washington Times???? Could you have picked a worse source for your drivel?

Cut down on the shrooms, Grok, you are heading toward a breakdown.

 

[Grokmaster]

The fucking Washington Times???? Could you have picked a worse source for your drivel?

Cut down on the shrooms, Grok, you are heading toward a breakdown.

Desperate Alinsky "attack the source" bullshit duly noted.

Please cite which part of the DSA platform they got wrong, dipshit.


Another leftidiot clueless about what the DSA seek...

 

[archives]

The continuing communist-style policies of the DSA are glaringly illustrated in their new platform, which seeks to eliminate the US Senate, the SCOTUS, and Presidency, while establishing an all-powerful "Politburo" in the US House.

Anyone who has actually read "The Social Contract" (Rousseau, 1762) , and "The Communist Manifesto" (Marx, Engels, etal, 1848) can easily discern the nearly identical desire to consolidate power in a central body, despite their continuing claims of no relation to communism, while touting a blatantly Soviet-esque desire to destroy 2/3+ of the US government.

Americans had best take heed of these power-hungry hucksters, as their "vision" is nothing short of backdoor Bolshevism....which would destroy the greatest Constitutional republic in the history of the human race.

Ignore the pretenses otherwise....

Democratic Socialists of America’s new platform calls for abolishing ICE and the U.S. Senate​

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2026/jul/15/updated-dsa-platform-calls-abolishing-ice-

Same old same old [SIZE=7]zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz[/SIZE]

 

[Grokmaster]

Same old same old [SIZE=7]zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz[/SIZE]

Cannot refute a syllable, so attack the font size....your desperate surrender is accepted...

 

[Ross Dolan]

Desperate Alinsky "attack the source" bullshit duly noted.

Coming from a MAGA moron who regularly attack the MSM as a poor source, this is so laughable, I feel compelled to thank you for it.

Please cite which part of the DSA platform they got wrong, dipshit.

First, let me say that their main theme that "Workers deserve more" is right on the button.

Now, I reject all of it...and ask you to cite and give a link to all of the things alleged in that Washington Times (oh, my aching sides) bullshit. Then I will discuss what you present.

Another leftidiot clueless about what the DSA seek...

Actually, I do not give a shit what the DSA seeks. I want to evaluate candidates based on what that individual seeks. And I find a shitload more sane candidates coming from the left than from the looney fringes of the right.

I was simply laughing at your "source." Not that I suppose you are capable of understanding the irony of your move.

 

[archives]

Cannot refute a syllable, so attack the font size....your desperate surrender is accepted...

Yeah, well, whatever, good luck with your Democrats are Commies rant

 

[Grokmaster]

Coming from a MAGA moron who regularly attack the MSM as a poor source, this is so laughable, I feel compelled to thank you for it.



First, let me say that their main theme that "Workers deserve more" is right on the button.

Now, I reject all of it...and ask you to cite and give a link to all of the things alleged in that Washington Times (oh, my aching sides) bullshit. Then I will discuss what you present.



Actually, I do not give a shit what the DSA seeks. I want to evaluate candidates based on what that individual seeks. And I find a shitload more sane candidates coming from the left than from the looney fringes of the right.

I was simply laughing at your "source." Not that I suppose you are capable of understanding the irony of your move.

So we should eliminate the Senate, the SCOTUS, and the Presidency?


Once again: my source accurately detailed the DSA platform, stupidfuck.

 

[Grokmaster]

Yeah, well, whatever, good luck with your Democrats are Commies rant

The DSA platform clearly is.


I didn't mention non-DSA dems, you lyingass bitch.


Good luck with your lameass strawman attempt.

 

[Grokmaster]

 

[Ross Dolan]

So we should eliminate the Senate, the SCOTUS, and the Presidency?

I have long advocated for substantive changes to our government that resolves, in my opinion, into a parliamentary form of government...which I see as superior to the one we have. In my opinion, advocating for the elimination of the senate is a reasonable subject to discuss and debate. And I suspect it could be an improvement in the governance of our country.

I would love to see the elimination of the presidency and see that move to be one that might improve our governance. A government based on a parliamentary form would do that.

Both those things fall under the heading of "advocating for less government is greatly inferior to advocating for better government."

As for the SCOTUS...something has to be done about that. The notion of making the judiciary subordinate to the legislative is worthy of debate. I am not sure how strong my advocacy for that move would be. Need the debate.

If you have a problem with a segment of voters advocating for those things...fine. You have that right. But if you suppose that suggesting those moves to be traitorous, you are all wet.

Once again: my source accurately detailed the DSA platform, stupidfuck.

And your "source" sucks like a black hole...which is what I said.

 

[Noking]

The continuing communist-style policies of the DSA are glaringly illustrated in their new platform, which seeks to eliminate the US Senate, the SCOTUS, and Presidency, while establishing an all-powerful "Politburo" in the US House.

Anyone who has actually read "The Social Contract" (Rousseau, 1762) , and "The Communist Manifesto" (Marx, Engels, etal, 1848) can easily discern the nearly identical desire to consolidate power in a central body, despite their continuing claims of no relation to communism, while touting a blatantly Soviet-esque desire to destroy 2/3+ of the US government.

Americans had best take heed of these power-hungry hucksters, as their "vision" is nothing short of backdoor Bolshevism....which would destroy the greatest Constitutional republic in the history of the human race.

Ignore the pretenses otherwise....

Democratic Socialists of America’s new platform calls for abolishing ICE and the U.S. Senate​

Democratic Socialists of America’s new platform calls for abolishing ICE and the U.S. Senate

The Democratic Socialists of America has released an updated platform that calls for a sweeping remake of the political system, including eliminating the U.S. Senate and abolishing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

www.washingtontimes.com

We sure can count on you to post some blatant stupidity.

 

[Grokmaster]

I have long advocated for substantive changes to our government that resolves, in my opinion, into a parliamentary form of government...which I see as superior to the one we have. In my opinion, advocating for the elimination of the senate is a reasonable subject to discuss and debate. And I suspect it could be an improvement in the governance of our country.

I would love to see the elimination of the presidency and see that move to be one that might improve our governance. A government based on a parliamentary form would do that.

Both those things fall under the heading of "advocating for less government is greatly inferior to advocating for better government."

As for the SCOTUS...something has to be done about that. The notion of making the judiciary subordinate to the legislative is worthy of debate. I am not sure how strong my advocacy for that move would be. Need the debate.

If you have a problem with a segment of voters advocating for those things...fine. You have that right. But if you suppose that suggesting those moves to be traitorous, you are all wet.

And your "source" sucks like a black hole...which is what I said.

Once again, cite a single error in how my source listed the DSA platform, or STFU about it.

You seek to remove the citizens' power to vote for their own leaders, eliminating checks and balances by having a SINGLE SOUIRCE OF POLITICAL POWER.

I have a problem with establishing a Politburo to govern America; the DSA platform is its plan for permanent, unopposed power...and denying the communist undertone requires the kind of gaslighting that defines the left.

 

[Ross Dolan]

Once again, cite a single error in how my source listed the DSA platform, or STFU about it.

Fuck you. I said that using the source you did was a joke...and it is. If you think not, tell us why not or shut the fuck up.

You seek to remove the citizens' power to vote for their own leaders, eliminating checks and balances by having a SINGLE SOUIRCE OF POLITICAL POWER.

You are insane. I never said any such thing. Are you supposing that countries with parliamentary governments have that problem, you fucking moron?

I have a problem with establishing a Politburo to govern America;

One...I do not give a shit what you have a problem with because I think you are a fucking moron.

I would oppose a politburo myself...despite the fact that I would be joined by morons like you in that undertaking.

the DSA platform is its plan for permanent, unopposed power...and denying the communist undertone requires the kind of gaslighting that defines the left.

Have I mentioned that I think you are a moron?

 

[Rusty Bell 65]

Fuck you. I said that using the source you did was a joke...and it is. If you think not, tell us why not or shut the fuck up.


You are insane. I never said any such thing. Are you supposing that countries with parliamentary governments have that problem, you fucking moron?



One...I do not give a shit what you have a problem with because I think you are a fucking moron.

I would oppose a politburo myself...despite the fact that I would be joined by morons like you in that undertaking.

Have I mentioned that I think you are a moron?

Frank, settle down! You're gonna have a coronary! The rain will stop and you can go golfing afterward.

 

[Moosakofsky]

Fuck you. I said that using the source you did was a joke...and it is.

Noted.
How about this source? https://www.dsausa.org/. https://program.dsausa.org/

 

[Grokmaster]

Fuck you. I said that using the source you did was a joke...and it is. If you think not, tell us why not or shut the fuck up.


You are insane. I never said any such thing. Are you supposing that countries with parliamentary governments have that problem, you fucking moron?



One...I do not give a shit what you have a problem with because I think you are a fucking moron.

I would oppose a politburo myself...despite the fact that I would be joined by morons like you in that undertaking.

Have I mentioned that I think you are a moron?

So you disagree with the DSA platform? Makeup your fucking mind, scatterbrain?

 

[AProudLefty]

Noted.
How about this source? https://www.dsausa.org/. https://program.dsausa.org/

Show where their goal is Communism.

 

[Grokmaster]

Fuck you. I said that using the source you did was a joke...and it is. If you think not, tell us why not or shut the fuck up.


You are insane. I never said any such thing. Are you supposing that countries with parliamentary governments have that problem, you fucking moron?



One...I do not give a shit what you have a problem with because I think you are a fucking moron.

I would oppose a politburo myself...despite the fact that I would be joined by morons like you in that undertaking.

Have I mentioned that I think you are a moron?

What a confused ignoramus.

A parliamentary government has a SINGLE AUTHORITY....PARLIAMENT....DUMBASS.

There re no checks nd balances, which forces elections on no schedule, leaving the nation in constant turmoil.

And please name the parliamentary government w/o a single leader , usually a PM...who is NOT ELECTED BY THE PEOPLE, BUT BY PARLIAMENT.

You've really never read much....have you ??

It shows....

 

[Guno צְבִי]

What a confused ignoramus.

A parliamentary government has a SINGLE AUTHORITY....PARLIAMENT....DUMBASS.

There re no checks nd balances, which forces elections on no schedule, leaving the nation in constant turmoil.

And please name the parliamentary government w/o a single leader , usually a PM...who is NOT ELECTED BY THE PEOPLE, BUT BY PARLIAMENT.

You've really never read much....have you ??

It shows....

And the US pres is elected by the electoral college , chief running dumb ass