Democrats caught deliberately lying to make Trump look tyrannical and lawless

CharacterAssassin said:
LOL! Why can't you actually cite where Pelosi lied, you desperate, pathetic whore?

What she stated was accurate.

Please stop eating so much shit.
Click to expand...

Um...I did. You being too stupid and semi-literate to comprehend what you read is not me failing to point it out. It's you being a low-IQ halfwit. :dunno:

She deliberately misrepresented it as Trump saying he GENERALLY gets to do whatever he wants, when she knew damn well that he was specifically referring to the Mueller investigation...on which he DOES have the authority to do whatever he wants.

Comprehend it yet, imbecile? :laugh:

View attachment 13180
 
Peosi is barely able to speak in a coherent manner -nobody cares what she says.
Soon this pig circus moves to the Senate where it's stillborn. game over
 
dukkha said:
Peosi is barely able to speak in a coherent manner -nobody cares what she says.
Soon this pig circus moves to the Senate where it's stillborn. game over
Click to expand...

The fact that it was even INITIATED without consequences is the problem. People need to be ousted, investigated, and imprisoned for treasonously trying to derail a presidency with manufactured smear campaigns, witch hunts, and coup attempts. The Senate is irrelevant to me. Treason is treason.
 
Arminius said:
View attachment 13138

Desperation, much? :laugh:

Pelosi:

"The president’s actions have seriously violated the Constitution, especially when he says and acts upon the belief ‘Article II says I can do whatever I want.’ No. His wrongdoing strikes at the very heart of our Constitution."

This was a blatantly dishonest attempt to misrepresent what he said to make him look lawless and tyrannical (see Democrat conduct for real examples) for their impeachment hoax.

The ACTUAL quote was about the Mueller investigation:

"Look, Article II, I would be allowed to fire Robert Mueller. Assuming I did all of the things, I said I want to fire him. Number one, I didn’t. He wasn’t fired. Number one, very importantly but more importantly, Article II allows me to do whatever I want. Article II would allow me to fire him. I wasn’t going to fire him. You know why — because I watched Richard Nixon firing everybody and that didn’t work out too well."

Again, Democrats are pathological liars.

View attachment 13137
Click to expand...

Nobody has to make Trump look "tyrannical and lawless" ,he does that on his own.
 
Arminius said:
But then why do they constantly get caught lying to make him like like that? :thinking:
Click to expand...

"They" is ambiguous. Are you referring to Trump and his followers who lie day after day. The reports proves you righyts are wrong again, But evidence means nothing to you rightys. The Report was compiled by Trump's people.
 
Arminius said:
The fact that it was even INITIATED without consequences is the problem. People need to be ousted, investigated, and imprisoned for treasonously trying to derail a presidency with manufactured smear campaigns, witch hunts, and coup attempts. The Senate is irrelevant to me. Treason is treason.
Click to expand...

I recall Strzok and Page being investigated and losing their jobs. Yet no charges of treason, why is that Ms. Cheney?
 
Nordberg said:
"They" is ambiguous.
Click to expand...

Yes, who could possibly manage to deduce that the people being talked about since the beginning of this thread--Democrats--is who we mean by "they?" :palm:

View attachment 13221The reports proves you righyts are wrong again[/QUOTE]

What report? Who's talking about a report? You're off your meds again. And no, one guy out of three ignoring an ocean of evidence (presuming you're talking about the hilariously absurd IG report) while those leading the other two far deeper investigations publicly and vigorously contradict him is not proving conservatives wrong. If anything, it vindicates their position that even with this much proof of a coup attempt, the "justice" system is too rigged by Obama's cronies let them acknowledge what is already well-established in the public sphere.

Try again. :bs:

Nordberg said:
But evidence means nothing to you rightys.
Click to expand...

Say the people who spent the last 3 years insisting that Trump was a secret Russian agent. :lolup:
 
christiefan915 said:
I recall Strzok and Page being investigated and losing their jobs. Yet no charges of treason, why is that Ms. Cheney?
Click to expand...

Treason isn't technically what they will end up getting charged with if the other two deeper and broader investigations (Barr and Durham) have a shred of integrity and hold them accountable. It will come down to defrauding the courts, perjury, tampering with evidence, lying to the FBI and DOJ, etc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top