Democrats Pass Resolution Applauding ‘Nonreligious Americans,’ Criticizing Churchgoer

[gfm7175]

LOL! No one actually knows, but 'magic sky-man' isn't a rational answer.

Wait, but didn't you just get done trying to tell me that the Big Bang Theory is a "scientific theory"??!!


Also, describe for me precisely how you have falsified the "magic sky-man" theory...

 

[Superfreak]

Atheism is not a religion. It's a lack of belief. I can never wrap my head around how fucked your brain must truly be to believe atheism, like anything else, is religion.

Wrong. Atheism is a BELIEF that there is/are no God(s).

Agnosticism is a lack of belief in the existence of God(s)

 

[dukkha]

I am tolerant of other religions; when they keep to their goddamned selves, and not try to force themselves via legislation on the public at large.

no you aren't. the sight of a religious cross or display makes you rage -nothing at all "tolerant"

 

[CharacterAssassin]

Yes, it is. It is the belief that god(s) do not exist.

No, whore, it's not, as has already been demonstrated. The absence of a belief is itself not a belief.

There you go again, expressing your beliefs...
Care to continue refuting yourself? It's quite entertaining...

Thanks for admitting that I haven't refuted myself and that you have nothing but pathological dishonesty to offer.

Yes, it is.

No, whore, it's not, nor can you demonstrate otherwise. Inversion fallacy yet again!

A belief about the definition of Atheism isn't a belief about Theism.
A belief that Theism isn't true (ie, that god(s) do not exist) IS a belief about Theism, however.

Utterly irrelevant to anything I've posted.

No counterargument?

No need for one, when I've already pointed out your lies.

Yes, it is. That's precisely what the Atheist is affirming.

No, whore, it's not. Atheism is not an affirmative belief that there is no god, full stop. Why does that enrage you so?

You don't own me. I am self governed, under God's moral standard.

I own you. Why do you piss in the face of god?

 

[dukkha]

Sorry, I'm no following. I assume you mean to paint me as a puritan of the left slant; you have failed.

You are a Maoist last time I looked -have you switched to another Communist manifesto?

 

[CharacterAssassin]

Wait, but didn't you just get done trying to tell me that the Big Bang Theory is a "scientific theory"??!!

And it is.

Also, describe for me precisely how you have falsified the "magic sky-man" theory...

That's not a theory.

 

[gfm7175]

Utterly irrelevant to the fact that it's a scientific theory and doesn't need to be falsifiable. Nice inversion fallacy, whore.

It's OK that you're in completely over your hear here.

It's completely relevant. Science is quite literally "a set of falsifiable theories". The theory ABSOLUTELY needs to be falsifiable in order to be science.

 

[CharacterAssassin]

It's completely relevant. Science is quite literally "a set of falsifiable theories". The theory ABSOLUTELY needs to be falsifiable in order to be science.

LOL! The Big Bang is a falsifiable theory (not that a dumb whore like you would ever know, of course) but it doesn't really need to be. If it were demonstrated that the Universe was either static or in a steady state, the Big Bang would have been disproved.

I win, you lose.

Yet again.

 

[Jade Dragon]

Even if this were true, I'd rather feel unwanted then be in a room full of fakes.

 

[gfm7175]

No, whore, it's not, as has already been demonstrated. The absence of a belief is itself not a belief.

The position "Theism is not true" is NOT 'absence of belief'. It is the very formation and expression of a belief, whore.

Thanks for admitting that I haven't refuted myself and that you have nothing but pathological dishonesty to offer.

Lie, whore.

No, whore, it's not, nor can you demonstrate otherwise. Inversion fallacy yet again!

Yes, whore, it is. Learn what a fallacy is, whore.

Utterly irrelevant to anything I've posted.

Relevant to everything you posted, whore.

No need for one, when I've already pointed out your lies.

Inversion Fallacy, whore. YOU are the one lying, whore.

No, whore, it's not.

Yes, whore, it is.

Atheism is not an affirmative belief that there is no god, full stop.

Yes it is, whore.

Why does that enrage you so?

Me? Enraged by a moron such as yourself?

I own you.

No you don't, whore.

Why do you piss in the face of god?

Inversion Fallacy, whore.

 

[gfm7175]

And it is.

No, it's not. It is not falsifiable. A theory of science MUST be falsifiable.

That's not a theory.

Yes, it is. A theory is simply an explanatory argument.

 

[CharacterAssassin]

The position "Theism is not true" is NOT 'absence of belief'. It is the very formation and expression of a belief, whore.

That's not the position of atheism, whore.

*much useless drivel snipped*

I've mopped the floor with you, whore. You don't know what atheism actually is and, hence, you're compelled to lie about it.

Nice owning you. I accept your surrender. Being on your knees is a great look for you.

 

[Jack]

I am not forced to believe anything but yes I believe that, you are forced to believe that a child in the womb is not life or you are castrated!

You are 'forced'. You have to 'buy in' to the 'Belief System', just like Jews, Muslims, Hindus and all the rest. FreeThinkers can actually make a choice, and also change their minds.

 

[CharacterAssassin]

No, it's not. It is not falsifiable. A theory of science MUST be falsifiable.

And I already demonstrate that it is, whore.

Yes, it is. A theory is simply an explanatory argument.

Newp. It's a hypothesis with absolutely no grounding in facts.

Nice owning you yet again, whore.

 

[gfm7175]

LOL! The Big Bang is a falsifiable theory (not that a dumb whore like you would ever know, of course)

No, it's not. Insult Fallacy.

but it doesn't really need to be.

Yes, it does. Falsifiability is absolutely necessary in order for a theory to be a theory of science.

If it were demonstrated that the Universe was either static or in a steady state, the Big Bang would have been disproved.

That wouldn't falsify the theory.

I win, you lose.

I win, you lose.

Yet again.

Yet again.

 

[gfm7175]

And I already demonstrate that it is, whore.

You demonstrated nothing, liar.

Newp. It's a hypothesis with absolutely no grounding in facts.

Not a hypothesis, a theory... Learn what a theory is, learn what a hypothesis is, and learn what a fact is.

Nice owning you yet again, whore.

Moooooooooooooooo

 

[gfm7175]

That's not the position of atheism, whore.

Yes it is, whore.

I've mopped the floor with you, whore.

Liar, whore.

You don't know what atheism actually is and, hence, you're compelled to lie about it.

Inversion Fallacy, whore.

Nice owning you. I accept your surrender. Being on your knees is a great look for you.

Mooooooooooooooooooooo, whore.

 

[CharacterAssassin]

All I do is lie out of my ass and desperately wish that people would take me seriously. And I have to make up new meanings for words because I can't back up anything I've ever said.

That about covers it, whore. Nice owning you.

 

[CharacterAssassin]

You demonstrated nothing, liar.


Not a hypothesis, a theory... Learn what a theory is, learn what a hypothesis is, and learn what a fact is.


Moooooooooooooooo

So you admit that the BBT is falsifiable and that the idea of some divine being doing this is only a hypothesis, unsupported by any factual data?

Oh, OK.

Nice owning you, whore.

 

[gfm7175]

So you admit that the BBT is falsifiable and that the idea of some divine being doing this is only a hypothesis, unsupported by any factual data?

Oh, OK.

Nice owning you, whore.

Liar, whore.

The BBT theory is not falsifiable.
The idea of some divine being doing this is a theory. It is also unfalsifiable.
Learn what data is; learn what facts are.