Dems taunt Trump with threats of prison time

No shortage of presumptuousness in your reply, but not much substance to though. I'm guessing ... because I have to ... that JimmyMcC's tally includes 10 obstruction allegations and a dozen Mueller spin offs. The democrats haven't come any closer to proving obstruction than Mueller, so we can dismiss those immediately. Mueller was pretty clear about no forthcoming charges aimed at Trump too ... so Bob's spin offs are dismissible too.
Again...you need to expand your horizons.
 
There is no "criminal investigation" of Trump. The SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY FAILED, and s OVER. It is the OBAMA SWAMP CONSPIRATORS who are under CRIMINL INVESTIGATION....


The House DUNCE-O-CRATS are not a "law enforcement " body...
LMAO...(trump voice) WRONG!
 
"A role reversal is starting to play out, alarming law enforcement veterans who see the Democrats mirroring Trump's calls to punish his opponents".

The difference is the chants for Clinton were BS, no proof, made up fake right wing hate.

This degenerate actually broke the law.

Note the difference......it's these types of false, fabricated, headlines that make people think both sides do it.
Let's not forget that Clinton spent 11 straight hours in front of Congress too. They found nothing. trump isn't man enough to go before Congress, and he obstructs every inquiry into his crimes.


That's a big difference.
 
Let's not forget that Clinton spent 11 straight hours in front of Congress too. They found nothing. trump isn't man enough to go before Congress, and he obstructs every inquiry into his crimes.


That's a big difference.

Yup, people go right pass the headline and give these stories legitimacy.

Can't believe people are so gullible.
 
The inane presumption is all yours. I said federal and state, which includes several congressional investigations. You have no idea about what you are talking.
Good to have you on the Board.
I'm talking about the arbitrary number [29] that you plucked out of thin air. So how many congressional investigations do we deduct from your total of the 29 you think will put the POTUS in prison? Because both(?) of us know that congress can't put a POTUS in prison. There are 2 investigations that could conceivably result in a criminal indictment. Both predicated on Michael Cohen's statements, and those statements aren't worth a damn.
 
The number has been posted several times before with the description of who and where and jurisdiction.

Tough, PM, you don't ever dictate the rules. We will guide you as needed.
 
You've arranged the part truth that helps your mancrush nicely. The whole truth would include that Mueller said obstruction was for the political branch to deal with about a sitting potus, that he could not exonerate Trump, and you'd acknowledge that Trump is still being investigated by a Congress
that hates his guts and believes he is a criminal and that Trump's lawyers have stonewalled fact gathering even when it is in the form of subpoeanas. Why can't you people deal in truth? Why is it so impossible to let anything slip out. I have no problem. It's because I'm not desperately fearful of it.
I feel like I've stumbled into a childrens forum. Nothing but adolescent projection?
 
14 federal investigations, many of which could result in prison terms
15 state investigations, any of which could also result in prison terms and not be pardonable.

You silly boy is in shit up to his nose.

lmao ... You just throw some numbers out, and that's the end of it?
 
Get ready for a potential new 2020 presidential campaign chant: “Lock him up.”

I don't doubt they'll do that - use his own original material. This is the mistake all of his opponents have made so far. I've said this several if not many, times.
He baits his opponents to his level to play his game, the same game he's been playing for forty yrs. now. They're neophytes at it, he's a master. They never win. They never learn.
 
I doubt Trump will ever do any time. And I doubt the vocal majority would even ever want to see us lock up an American President.

At least not for anything prosecuted by the federal government. I think Mueller, pointed that out and the reasons why he won't be indicted, or prosecuted for his crimes.

Now, I can't say he won't be indicted and prosecuted for any state crimes. You are on your own there Mr. President. Good luck on that!

At this point, the vocal majority just wants us to replace Donald Trump with someone who is more suitable for office- and just looking ahead to 2020!

That's the mature way to look at it. If you want to reverse the '16 election, wait for the next election. If he's that bad he'll be replaced via the ballot box.
But there's a large contingent of dems that simply don't have the maturity, the patience or the confidence that he'll be voted out.
Which brings me to another thought: Confidence, or lack of, that he'll be voted out. Those with the illusion that he'll be convicted by the senate after impeachment probably believe, deep down, that he'll be re-elected.
 
Back
Top