DUNCE-O-CRAT CLUSTERF**K in IOWA:DNC CANNOT COME UP WITH RESULTS!!!
- Thread starter Grokmaster
- Start date
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
I don't think the mayor had anything to do with the failure with the App, as he probably had favorable numbers tonight, expected himself to do well, and certainly would not want to victimize himself.
We'll just have to wait on the cause of the failure, and the outcome of the caucus. I am suspecting the problem is with the Front-End server being overwhelmed by a limited Data Communications capacity to handle all the polling stations trying to transmit their data all about at the same time.
I doubt the Polling stations would use the internet to download the results and they used private Carrier lines to transmit- to try and prevent any kind of potential hacking.
Last edited:
He practically claimed victory in his speech and the numbers are not even out. That is slimy. The establishment Dems will do anything to sabotage Bernie.
WHY THAT SNEAKY LITTLE BASTARD!! DERAILED THE ENTIRE DNC APPARATUS, WITH HIS EVIL SABOQUEER BRIGADE!!!
YEAH...SEEMS LIKELY...
What you are witnessing is the BEGINNING OF THE END of Donald Trump!
We heard the same thing just before the election of 2016 when Hillary got her ass kicked.
The only one sabotaging Bernie is Bernie. You'd think at his age he would have learned promising the world to those that refuse to do for themselves is a failed proposition.
If that is the case, why didn't Democrats prepare any better? Are they claiming the caucus happening was a surprise?
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
lol.....sure.......the demmycrats not only can't decide how to beat Trump, they can't even figure out how to figure out WHO can beat Trump......
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
Strategy, my Dear! You shouldn't worry, as Bernie more-than-likely won the Iowa caucus, and he'll probably win New Hampshire, and he has a great chance to win Nevada.
And Congrats to Bernie, and all of his Youth movement that loves him.
Bernie's big test will be Super Tuesday. If Bernie can win all of that, he could be nominated.
Just so you will know, most Democrats, this time around, will not even bother with the primaries and the nomination process.
Why? And this is important- BECAUSE DEMOCRATS ARE ALREADY VOWED TO SUPPORT WHOEVER THE NOMINEE IS- AND WILL GO OUT IN RECORD NUMBERS IN NOVEMBER TO CUT THE HEAD OFF OF THE SNAKE- DONALD TRUMP! That did not happen last time- But they will this time because they know what is at stake- OUR DEMOCRACY!
I am encouraged to see all of these new young voters participating in the election. So I have to hand it to Bernie for bringing them to the table.
Last night, only 172,000 people voted in the Iowa Caucus out of millions of potential voters. DON'T be alarmed by this
Like I said, when the voters are so strongly united in taking the garbage out of the WHITE HOUSE- The Democrats do not even care who gets the nominee-
Most Democrats like all of the candidates- and are not that choosy! ANY OF THEM ARE MUCH BETTER THAN HAVING DONALD TRUMP AGAIN!
They will just say "OK FINE- The nominee is (Fill-in-the-blank) , so let's go vote for them in the General Election , and KICK DONALD TRUMP'S ASS SO HARD- RUDY GIULIANI WILL SQUIRT OUT HIS NOSE ON ONE SIDE- AND MITCH McCONNELL WILL BE SQUIRTING OUT THE OTHER"!
Last edited:
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
Oh! NO! Oh No!
In other words, you can't comment here in the forum, your ugly opinions of who won and who lost, and that is really frustrating you.
Why do you even care who wins the Democrat Iowa Caucus?
Shouldn't you be out cornholing some innocent canoer somewhere anyway?
Nope enjoying more Socialist pig tears!!!!!!!!! By the way this is a sad deflection of a post
CNN)The Democratic 2020 crusade to oust President Donald Trump could not have got off to a more disastrous and embarrassing start.
The party couldn't even deliver a first-in-the-nation election night winner after a vote-reporting debacle in Iowa — where candidates spent months and millions of dollars vying for a glittering opening prize in their nominating duel.
"Iowa, you have shocked the nation," said former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg.
It was a bold attempt to declare victory in the absence of a result, but the 38-year-old inadvertently cast an ironic judgment on a political train wreck.
The big Hawkeye State miss will be agonizing for whoever comes out on top but for any candidates who under performed -- perhaps former Vice President Joe Biden -- it might turn into a priceless lifeline.
Live updates: The 2020 Iowa caucuses
The caucus nightmare also played right into the hands of a President spoiling for months to brand his rivals as weak, disorganized and even worse — plotting to rig the results to hand its crown to an establishment favorite. There's little doubt that Trump, who consistently erodes distrust in institutions and governing systems, will weaponize such a narrative if it looks like he will lose in November.
The President pounced on the confusion early Tuesday morning.
"The Democrat Caucus is an unmitigated disaster. Nothing works, just like they ran the Country," he tweeted.
Meanwhile, Trump operatives are already spinning conspiracy theories and disinformation about what the Iowa Democratic Party said were "inconsistencies" in its results. Their aim is to create a narrative that tars the eventual nominee as illegitimate. And on the eve of his State of the Union address and two days before he's set to be acquitted in his impeachment trial, things cannot have worked out better for the President.
"It would be natural for people to doubt the fairness of the process. And these are the people who want to run our entire health care system?" Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale said, gleefully wringing every last drop of political advantage out of the Democratic blushes.
It could be that after the countless twists of the campaign and changes of fortune, Monday's snafu -- apparently by a vote-reporting app -- will be a distant memory by November, especially if one of the candidates turns Trump into a one-term president. Democrats will get the last laugh then.
What is going on in Iowa? Local officials raise concerns about vote reporting
What is going on in Iowa? Local officials raise concerns about vote reporting
But there must also be questions about whether the Iowa mess is isolated -- or augurs a party ill-equipped in the states to take on Trump's formidable turnout machine, which is being built with his massive campaign war chest. And the importance of Iowa in the process of choosing a president magnifies the cost of its terrible night on Monday.
Democratic party officials are now expecting results to be announced later on Tuesday, many hours after the caucuses that drew thousands of people to more than 1,600 caucus sites all over the state and more at satellite caucuses stretching as far as Europe.
Was Buttigieg robbed?
The party couldn't even deliver a first-in-the-nation election night winner after a vote-reporting debacle in Iowa — where candidates spent months and millions of dollars vying for a glittering opening prize in their nominating duel.
"Iowa, you have shocked the nation," said former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg.
It was a bold attempt to declare victory in the absence of a result, but the 38-year-old inadvertently cast an ironic judgment on a political train wreck.
The big Hawkeye State miss will be agonizing for whoever comes out on top but for any candidates who under performed -- perhaps former Vice President Joe Biden -- it might turn into a priceless lifeline.
Live updates: The 2020 Iowa caucuses
The caucus nightmare also played right into the hands of a President spoiling for months to brand his rivals as weak, disorganized and even worse — plotting to rig the results to hand its crown to an establishment favorite. There's little doubt that Trump, who consistently erodes distrust in institutions and governing systems, will weaponize such a narrative if it looks like he will lose in November.
The President pounced on the confusion early Tuesday morning.
"The Democrat Caucus is an unmitigated disaster. Nothing works, just like they ran the Country," he tweeted.
Meanwhile, Trump operatives are already spinning conspiracy theories and disinformation about what the Iowa Democratic Party said were "inconsistencies" in its results. Their aim is to create a narrative that tars the eventual nominee as illegitimate. And on the eve of his State of the Union address and two days before he's set to be acquitted in his impeachment trial, things cannot have worked out better for the President.
"It would be natural for people to doubt the fairness of the process. And these are the people who want to run our entire health care system?" Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale said, gleefully wringing every last drop of political advantage out of the Democratic blushes.
It could be that after the countless twists of the campaign and changes of fortune, Monday's snafu -- apparently by a vote-reporting app -- will be a distant memory by November, especially if one of the candidates turns Trump into a one-term president. Democrats will get the last laugh then.
What is going on in Iowa? Local officials raise concerns about vote reporting
What is going on in Iowa? Local officials raise concerns about vote reporting
But there must also be questions about whether the Iowa mess is isolated -- or augurs a party ill-equipped in the states to take on Trump's formidable turnout machine, which is being built with his massive campaign war chest. And the importance of Iowa in the process of choosing a president magnifies the cost of its terrible night on Monday.
Democratic party officials are now expecting results to be announced later on Tuesday, many hours after the caucuses that drew thousands of people to more than 1,600 caucus sites all over the state and more at satellite caucuses stretching as far as Europe.
Was Buttigieg robbed?
Illegals in California is why that happened, if it did, at all.
TRUMP GOT TEN MORE STATES...GUESS WHAT WON????
STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT FROM THE ONGOING 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT CLUSTERFUCK.....
No she didn't. He received 34 more electoral votes than he needed to win.
If all you have is Hillary got more of something not mentioned in the Constitution when it comes to how we elect a President, you have nothing.
Since you keep bringing it up, show me in the Constitution where popular votes determine the winner. I can show you where a majority of electoral votes does.
As to your question, yes. That's why he's President and she's not.
What he's doing is trying to claim something not mentioned in the Constitution should determine the winner while ignoring what is mentioned.
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
YEAH,WE NEED THESE IDIOTS RUNNING THE COUNTRY; THEY CAN'T EVEN MANAGE A SINGLE-STATE PRIMARY WITHOUT MAJOR FUCKUPS.
NO ONE KNOWS WHO WON WHAT, AS THERE ARE APPARENT PROBLEMS THROUGHOUT THE STATE, COMING UP WITH THE TOTALS !!!
Delays Mar Iowa Caucuses as Democrats Start Nominating Process
A “quality control” issue with a new system of reporting results led to confusion and few solid numbers as Iowans turned out to select the candidate they believed could defeat President Trump.
The Iowa Democratic Party said Monday night that results from the state’s first-in-the-nation caucus were delayed due to “quality checks” and new reporting rules, an embarrassing complication that added a new layer of doubt to an already uncertain presidential primary season.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/elec...0200203-zjbpvlon6nhl3kt2valjyjxea4-story.html
WHAT A BUNCH OF INCOMPETENT, FRIGGIN' BRAINDEAD, IDIOTS....
Russia’s fault