Englandistan in the news 🇬🇧

Alexander of the Duran today speculated that the purpose of the delayed transition is to make sure this new chap understands his instructions, and is inclined to follow them.
 
How many White guys? :LOL:

Grok, T. A. Gardner on Justplainpoliticscom wants to know how many white men are in the picture in this post: View: https://x.com/GBPolitcs/status/2069070030810026119?s=20






Approximately 100-120 white men are visible in the group photo, depending on how you define "in the picture" and visibility.


The image is a large group selfie taken inside what looks like a historic parliamentary or cathedral-like building (high ceilings, stained glass, stone architecture). Andy Burnham (a white man) is prominently in the foreground left, taking the selfie with a big smile and glasses. Behind him is a massive crowd of Labour MPs and staff, filling the frame in rows—roughly 150-200+ total people visible.


Breakdown (rough visual estimate from the photo):​


  • White men: The majority of the group consists of white (Caucasian/European-descended) individuals, many in suits or business attire typical of politicians. Visible white men make up a large portion—likely 100+ when counting those clearly identifiable in the mid-ground and background rows. Many are middle-aged or older, with typical features like light skin, varied hair colors (brown, gray, etc.).
  • Women (mostly white, some others): Several dozen in the front and middle rows (e.g., woman in bright pink jacket, blonde woman in light top, etc.).
  • Non-white individuals: A smaller but noticeable minority—roughly 20-40 people of Black, South Asian, or other ethnic backgrounds scattered throughout, including some men and women.
  • Total visible people: Easily over 150, packed densely.

Exact counts are subjective in a crowded photo like this (some faces are partially obscured, lighting varies, and "white" is based on visible phenotype/skin tone). The front rows have clearer views, while the back is more crowded.


If you want a more precise tally, a zoomed-in analysis, or focus on specific rows/sections, let me know!



 
HLcJ0EpXcAAvZBr
 
Grok, T. A. Gardner on Justplainpoliticscom wants to know how many white men are in the picture in this post: View: https://x.com/GBPolitcs/status/2069070030810026119?s=20






Approximately 100-120 white men are visible in the group photo, depending on how you define "in the picture" and visibility.


The image is a large group selfie taken inside what looks like a historic parliamentary or cathedral-like building (high ceilings, stained glass, stone architecture). Andy Burnham (a white man) is prominently in the foreground left, taking the selfie with a big smile and glasses. Behind him is a massive crowd of Labour MPs and staff, filling the frame in rows—roughly 150-200+ total people visible.


Breakdown (rough visual estimate from the photo):​


  • White men: The majority of the group consists of white (Caucasian/European-descended) individuals, many in suits or business attire typical of politicians. Visible white men make up a large portion—likely 100+ when counting those clearly identifiable in the mid-ground and background rows. Many are middle-aged or older, with typical features like light skin, varied hair colors (brown, gray, etc.).
  • Women (mostly white, some others): Several dozen in the front and middle rows (e.g., woman in bright pink jacket, blonde woman in light top, etc.).
  • Non-white individuals: A smaller but noticeable minority—roughly 20-40 people of Black, South Asian, or other ethnic backgrounds scattered throughout, including some men and women.
  • Total visible people: Easily over 150, packed densely.

Exact counts are subjective in a crowded photo like this (some faces are partially obscured, lighting varies, and "white" is based on visible phenotype/skin tone). The front rows have clearer views, while the back is more crowded.


If you want a more precise tally, a zoomed-in analysis, or focus on specific rows/sections, let me know!



Grok is wrong. There are only manholes in that picture.
 
Back
Top