You don’t seem to even know what an argument is.Ok Jerry
You don’t seem to even know what an argument is.Ok Jerry
I do not just think it, you simpleton. SCOTUS agrees too. If anyone needs grade school it is you. In fact I will just say it outright. You and morons like you all need to start over from scratch. If we could delete all the things you know that are not so, it would make things much easier.your idiot hyperbole aside, the only moron here is YOU if you think that a human being, illegally here or not, doesn't have rights because they are not an American.
you should go back to grade school and finish the education you are sorely lacking
When people know they're making an idiot argument, they resort to being a grammar nazi. Let me make this easier for you. YOU lost the argument, basically because your argument was wrong.I do not just think it, you simpleton. SCOTUS agrees too. If anyone needs grade school it is you. In fact I will just say it outright. You and morons like you all need to start over from scratch. If we could delete all the things you know that are not so, it would make things much easier.
I'll give you the first lesson free of charge. The first letter of every sentence should be capitalized. If you are trying to be trendy by not doing so, you really do not need those commas you threw in there, or the capital 'A' in American either, lol. It is a sign of your scatterbrain, but hard work and determination will get you there eventually.
ICE claims the right to enter your home without a warrant.
Historically and very long established caselaw says the only time the GOVERNMENT has that right is if they are in hot pursuit if a dangerous felon.
Do you Trumppers agree with ICE, that they can simply enter homes without a warrant? Is this not the type of shit we quit England over? What about the 4th Amendment?
Are you libertarians upset?
That does not include illegal aliens dumbass. The only right they have is immediate deportation."The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." United States Constitution, 4th Amendment.
So, you don't have any facts, your just here to spout off your usual uneducated lie filled nonsense. Got it.I do not know, but I see they are claiming the right to do so... Do you agree with them?
Since ONCE is already too many times...what kind of MAGA moron question is that?
In the one apartment complex at issue, I think I read hundreds.How many times has ICE entered a home without a warrant?
From the case:I looked into it, at least once... Would you prefer they not enter your home OR do you agree the Government does not have that right?
Gibson v. Bondi et al., No. 0:2026cv00172 (D. Minn. Jan. 15, 2026)
Judge: U.S. District Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan
This was a habeas corpus petition challenging Gibson's detention. The court's written opinion and order dated January 15, 2026 (Document 6 on the docket) ordered his immediate release, finding that ICE agents violated his Fourth Amendment rights by forcibly entering his home without consent and without a judicial warrant.
The opinion specifically states: "To arrest him, Respondents forcibly entered Garrison G.'s home without his consent and without a judicial warrant."
The court also found ICE violated its own regulations by failing to provide adequate notice and reasoning for revoking Gibson's order of supervision, and by not providing the required informal interview before revocation.
Notably, looking at the District of Minnesota docket around this time, there's a wave of similar habeas petitions being filed - at least a dozen cases between January 13-15, 2026, all challenging ICE detentions following the Minneapolis enforcement operations. All name either Bondi (the Attorney General), Lyons (Acting ICE Director), or Noem (DHS Secretary) as respondents.
--------------------
This appears to be the first published opinion directly ruling that entry under the May 2025 memo violates the Fourth Amendment.
There is a list of eyewitness reports of them doing just this in three or four other very recent cases.
Yes, the allegations are all based on lies. DUH!A list of other such cases in Minnesota that have not been ruled on yet. The allegations about ICE are substantially the same.
- Hernandez Castillo v. Bondi (0:2026cv00085)
- Astudillo Laica v. Bondi (0:2026cv00146)
- Gavilan Cuate v. Bondi (0:2026cv00161)
- Murillo Romero v. Bondi (0:2026cv00134)
No, you provided hyperbole, speculation and FAKE news sources.You asked if they were doing it, they are, and I am providing you links to it, and Judges orders finding they are doing it.
What kind of warrant?tenants have rights once an agreement has been entered. Unless police have a warrant, the land owner (landlord) cannot just let police in to a rented dwelling
We are not talking about tenants who are citizens. We are talking about illegal aliens who have deportation orders. DUH!tenants have rights once an agreement has been entered. Unless police have a warrant, the land owner (landlord) cannot just let police in to a rented dwelling
your idiot hyperbole aside, the only moron here is YOU if you think that a human being, illegally here or not, doesn't have rights because they are not an American.

you should go back to grade school and finish the education you are sorely lacking

Projecting as usual.You don’t seem to even know what an argument is.

Someone who has no education but believes they know constitutional law by listening to Donald Trump.
Someone who has no education
but believes they know constitutional law
by listening to Donald Trump.