Entering your home without a warrant.

your idiot hyperbole aside, the only moron here is YOU if you think that a human being, illegally here or not, doesn't have rights because they are not an American.

you should go back to grade school and finish the education you are sorely lacking
I do not just think it, you simpleton. SCOTUS agrees too. If anyone needs grade school it is you. In fact I will just say it outright. You and morons like you all need to start over from scratch. If we could delete all the things you know that are not so, it would make things much easier.

I'll give you the first lesson free of charge. The first letter of every sentence should be capitalized. If you are trying to be trendy by not doing so, you really do not need those commas you threw in there, or the capital 'A' in American either, lol. It is a sign of your scatterbrain, but hard work and determination will get you there eventually.
 
I do not just think it, you simpleton. SCOTUS agrees too. If anyone needs grade school it is you. In fact I will just say it outright. You and morons like you all need to start over from scratch. If we could delete all the things you know that are not so, it would make things much easier.

I'll give you the first lesson free of charge. The first letter of every sentence should be capitalized. If you are trying to be trendy by not doing so, you really do not need those commas you threw in there, or the capital 'A' in American either, lol. It is a sign of your scatterbrain, but hard work and determination will get you there eventually.
When people know they're making an idiot argument, they resort to being a grammar nazi. Let me make this easier for you. YOU lost the argument, basically because your argument was wrong.
 
ICE claims the right to enter your home without a warrant.

It can. Why do you want to protect law breaking illegal aliens? You're not a law clerk, hell, you're not even a secretary with the limited knowlegde you display.

You're nothing more than a leftist parrot that spews the dumb garbage you are spoon fed on this forum.

The requirement for a warrant before entering a private residence protects U.S. citizens, but the Immigration and Nationality Act makes allowances for ICE officers to bypass some of the standard procedures when it comes to suspicions of immigration crimes.

Historically and very long established caselaw says the only time the GOVERNMENT has that right is if they are in hot pursuit if a dangerous felon.

Wrong as usual. The Immigration and Nationality Act say you're uneducated and a dumbass.

Do you Trumppers agree with ICE, that they can simply enter homes without a warrant? Is this not the type of shit we quit England over? What about the 4th Amendment?

If they are in pursuit of someone suspected of committing immigration crimes, yes. DUH!!

Are you libertarians upset?

You should be upset being such an uneducated, brainless unhinged dumbass. But alas, uneducated, brainless unhinged dumbasses don't even know they are uneducated, brainless unhinged dumbasses.
 
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." United States Constitution, 4th Amendment.
That does not include illegal aliens dumbass. The only right they have is immediate deportation.
 
I looked into it, at least once... Would you prefer they not enter your home OR do you agree the Government does not have that right?


Gibson v. Bondi et al., No. 0:2026cv00172 (D. Minn. Jan. 15, 2026)


Judge: U.S. District Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan

This was a habeas corpus petition challenging Gibson's detention. The court's written opinion and order dated January 15, 2026 (Document 6 on the docket) ordered his immediate release, finding that ICE agents violated his Fourth Amendment rights by forcibly entering his home without consent and without a judicial warrant.

The opinion specifically states: "To arrest him, Respondents forcibly entered Garrison G.'s home without his consent and without a judicial warrant."

The court also found ICE violated its own regulations by failing to provide adequate notice and reasoning for revoking Gibson's order of supervision, and by not providing the required informal interview before revocation.

Notably, looking at the District of Minnesota docket around this time, there's a wave of similar habeas petitions being filed - at least a dozen cases between January 13-15, 2026, all challenging ICE detentions following the Minneapolis enforcement operations. All name either Bondi (the Attorney General), Lyons (Acting ICE Director), or Noem (DHS Secretary) as respondents.

--------------------

This appears to be the first published opinion directly ruling that entry under the May 2025 memo violates the Fourth Amendment.


There is a list of eyewitness reports of them doing just this in three or four other very recent cases.
From the case:

2. On June 23, 2009, an immigration judge ordered Garrison G. removed from the United States. (Id.¶ 3.)

Nothing more need be stated. He was ordered removed. The BIG question is why was he still here after the removal order. They did not need a warrant according to the INA.
 
  • Hernandez Castillo v. Bondi (0:2026cv00085)
  • Astudillo Laica v. Bondi (0:2026cv00146)
  • Gavilan Cuate v. Bondi (0:2026cv00161)
  • Murillo Romero v. Bondi (0:2026cv00134)
A list of other such cases in Minnesota that have not been ruled on yet. The allegations about ICE are substantially the same.
Yes, the allegations are all based on lies. DUH!
 
your idiot hyperbole aside, the only moron here is YOU if you think that a human being, illegally here or not, doesn't have rights because they are not an American.

The only rights an illegal alien with deportation orders has is immediate deportation you brainless assclown. :palm:

you should go back to grade school and finish the education you are sorely lacking

Take your own advice you arrogant, brainless assclown. :palm:
 
So the alt right believes that police have the right to tear the doors off people's houses, and arrest everyone in a neighborhood, just because some of them might be criminals. The Constitution disagrees.
 
Back
Top