F.B.I. Sent Investigator Posing as Assistant to Meet With Trump Aide in 2016

Russian interference with our election ya stupid shit

Papadopoulos had nothing to do with any Russian interference you clueless brain dead hack.

Does it occur to you that if the FBI were already investigating Russian interference in our election back in March 2016, it implicates the Justice Department and the Obama Administration as being incompetent and culpable for the HOAX investigation of Trump.
 
He goes into great detail about this spy in his book. Now it looks like it has been confirmed.
Much more will be confirmed soon.
 
The conversation at a London bar in September 2016 took a strange turn when the woman sitting across from George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign adviser, asked a direct question: Was the Trump campaign working with Russia? The woman had set up the meeting to discuss foreign policy issues. But she was actually a government investigator posing as a research assistant, according to people familiar with the operation. The F.B.I. sent her to London as part of the counterintelligence inquiry

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/02/...gator-trump.html?login=email&auth=login-email

FBI Deep State In Panic Mode… Spygate Bombshell Just Dropped


This kills Mueller’s report on when the investigation began. In fact this completely kills the whole Russian collusion charge. For the NYT to be publishing this means the mustard is about to come off the hot dog.

An FBI spy on foreign soil attempting to entrap an American citizen for the purpose of interfering in an election?
 
Papadopoulos had nothing to do with any Russian interference you clueless brain dead hack.

Does it occur to you that if the FBI were already investigating Russian interference in our election back in March 2016, it implicates the Justice Department and the Obama Administration as being incompetent and culpable for the HOAX investigation of Trump.

:hand:
 
Deep state is leaking this in order to defuse it.

More to come.

This is some evil governing.

Trump was totally innocent.

Yup.

It’s called establishing a counter narrative ahead of the report aka ‘damage control’.

No way this would have been leaked if the IG report wasn’t coming out. Btw, who leaked counterintelligence information?

Sounds like there’s still some rats aboard the ship.
 
The conversation at a London bar in September 2016 took a strange turn when the woman sitting across from George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign adviser, asked a direct question: Was the Trump campaign working with Russia? The woman had set up the meeting to discuss foreign policy issues. But she was actually a government investigator posing as a research assistant, according to people familiar with the operation. The F.B.I. sent her to London as part of the counterintelligence inquiry

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/02/...gator-trump.html?login=email&auth=login-email

FBI Deep State In Panic Mode… Spygate Bombshell Just Dropped


This kills Mueller’s report on when the investigation began. In fact this completely kills the whole Russian collusion charge. For the NYT to be publishing this means the mustard is about to come off the hot dog.

Give it up, the "deep state" conspiracies are all Hannity
 
The conversation at a London bar in September 2016 took a strange turn when the woman sitting across from George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign adviser, asked a direct question: Was the Trump campaign working with Russia? The woman had set up the meeting to discuss foreign policy issues. But she was actually a government investigator posing as a research assistant, according to people familiar with the operation. The F.B.I. sent her to London as part of the counterintelligence inquiry

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/02/...gator-trump.html?login=email&auth=login-email

FBI Deep State In Panic Mode… Spygate Bombshell Just Dropped


This kills Mueller’s report on when the investigation began. In fact this completely kills the whole Russian collusion charge. For the NYT to be publishing this means the mustard is about to come off the hot dog.

1) how does this contradict the Mueller report?

2) so what, nothing wrong with finding out if a campaign is working with a foreign advissary. .
 
The conversation at a London bar in September 2016 took a strange turn when the woman sitting across from George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign adviser, asked a direct question: Was the Trump campaign working with Russia? The woman had set up the meeting to discuss foreign policy issues. But she was actually a government investigator posing as a research assistant, according to people familiar with the operation. The F.B.I. sent her to London as part of the counterintelligence inquiry

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/02/...gator-trump.html?login=email&auth=login-email

FBI Deep State In Panic Mode… Spygate Bombshell Just Dropped


This kills Mueller’s report on when the investigation began. In fact this completely kills the whole Russian collusion charge. For the NYT to be publishing this means the mustard is about to come off the hot dog.

Exactly. They were pressing hard on Papadopoulis as they were attempting to set him up.
Now the deep state is trying let out small controlled soundbites to "soften the blow" when it all hits the fan.
Clapper is back out there again in the media saying stupid stuff like, "Yes, well of course...er...uh...you know we
had...ah...knowledge of Russian interfering...uh.........you know there's ALWAYS been problems like
this with Russia"......blah blah blah, etc.
Bunch of snakes!
 
Blabbing about what lol?

Mullet had nothing on Papadopoulos. Nothing.

He got drunk while in London and blabbed about Russians giving him/team Trump dirt on Clinton to a Australian ambassador. That you don't know that is just more evidence of your laughable pig-ignorance of the matter.

And he had nothing on him? Then why did he lie, plead guilty and go to jail.

You're stupid.
 
1) how does this contradict the Mueller report?

2) so what, nothing wrong with finding out if a campaign is working with a foreign advisory.

And when it involves low level staff the campaign heads are supposed to get an intelligence briefing.

And besides, Papadopoulos was being *approached* by people. Spies, by every appearance.

I wonder if the CIA was involved?
 
And when it involves low level staff the campaign heads are supposed to get an intelligence briefing.

And besides, Papadopoulos was being *approached* by people. Spies, by every appearance.

I wonder if the CIA was involved?

Again...

1) how does this contradict the Mueller report?

2) so what, nothing wrong with finding out if a campaign is working with a foreign advissary.
 
And when it involves low level staff the campaign heads are supposed to get an intelligence briefing.

And besides, Papadopoulos was being *approached* by people. Spies, by every appearance.

I wonder if the CIA was involved?

Looks like entrapment, doesn't it?
 
He got drunk while in London and blabbed about Russians giving him/team Trump dirt on Clinton to a Australian ambassador. That you don't know that is just more evidence of your laughable pig-ignorance of the matter.

And he had nothing on him? Then why did he lie, plead guilty and go to jail.

You're stupid.

Dude, if Mullet had anything besides a process crime on Papadopoulos, papadop would have done more than two weeks in the slammer. In fact, for those of us who were paying attention, the Papadopoulos indictment was a strong indicator that Mullet was still searching for collusion—or whatever the word is now.
 
He got drunk while in London and blabbed about Russians giving him/team Trump dirt on Clinton to a Australian ambassador.

That's odd, the failing NYT article says she posed as Halper "the Helper's" assistant.

She was an Australian Ambassadress? Which country did she allegedly represent the Lucky Country in?
 
Back
Top