The “spying” that was ridiculed by the left, actually was spying...on a political opponent. Not good.
Lie, the wiretapping was ridiculed by the left. The left was correct.
The “spying” that was ridiculed by the left, actually was spying...on a political opponent. Not good.
So can wiretapping.
Yet earlier, you attempted to pretend the two are unrelated, didn't you, BRAD?
You have some evidence there was wiretapping as Rump claimed?
Spying can be a part of an investigation.
spying and wiretapping are two different things.
BTW, Rump you don't think Rump is demanding Barr spy on the Biden Campaign?
Barr has 0 creditability. There will be an investigation to satisfy the man with the golden toilet, but there will be no findings, it will just be drawn out to November 2020, so Rump can throw innuendo and threats out.... It will occupy the place of the Benghazi and email "investigations" from 2016.
You’re projecting lol.
The economy is setting records and democrats lack a message. Mullet came up empty, so their only choice is to resort to innuendo derived from Mullet’s report—and there’s nothing there but a maybe kinda sorta obstruction case that wouldn’t last five minutes in front of a jury.
They aren’t even serious about impeachment—or at least whatever is left of serious minded democrats.
But they need to make noise about it to keep their deranged base fired up because there’s no way they can win without them. They can’t do anything with Barr but they have to at least try and intimidate him into submission because Barr can blow the lid off the whole thing.
And Barr is having none of it. All of it is really good stuff if you loathe Swamp politics.
If not, oh well.
We will see, but I am confident the "investigations" Rump is pushing for will result in nothing. Its the playbook, its what they did to HRC.
So Trump can start a counterintelligence investigation into all 20 democrat candidates and put spies in their campaigns?
Okey dokey
To invoke the cliche ‘the jury is still out on that’.
Don’t you wish Trump had a ‘more pliable’ lol, AG like Sessions? I saw where Nancy is threatening Barr with the crime of lying to Congress. Problem is, Barr didn’t fall off this morning’s apple cart.
Why do democrats want rid of Barr so bad?
You’re projecting lol.
The economy is setting records and democrats lack a message. Mullet came up empty, so their only choice is to resort to innuendo derived from Mullet’s report—and there’s nothing there but a maybe kinda sorta obstruction case that wouldn’t last five minutes in front of a jury.
They aren’t even serious about impeachment—or at least whatever is left of serious minded democrats.
But they need to make noise about it to keep their deranged base fired up because there’s no way they can win without them. They can’t do anything with Barr but they have to at least try and intimidate him into submission because Barr can blow the lid off the whole thing.
And Barr is having none of it. All of it is really good stuff if you loathe Swamp politics.
If not, oh well.
We will see, but I am confident the "investigations" Rump is pushing for will result in nothing. Its the playbook, its what they did to HRC.
Changing the subject? Have you forgotten your original query?The Russians lol!
Why do you find it insignificant that they got it so wrong about Page? Page was deemed an innocent man even after a Mullet rectal exam.
Yes, indeed it was spying, using the power of government against a political opponent.
Changing the subject? Have you forgotten your original query?
You guys don't think Rump is pushing for the FBI to spy on Biden?
so the FBI doesn't routinely use informers, plants and moles to conduct investigations?