So you're saying that you are;
- Just like the Nazis (we already knew that)
- That you are justified in attempting to put normals in concentrations camps because genocide is reasonable. (Fascist/Marxist logic at work)
Federal agents have searched Democratic U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar’s home as part of a criminal investigation
- Thread starter Hume
- Start date
So you're saying that you are;
Afraid not Dick. You all are too fond of calling immigration a civil matter. There isn't going to be a jury just a judge banging the gavel and her getting the fuck out of my country finally.
Another cult member that thinks US citizens can be deported. You better hope you are wrong or you will be spending time in Somalia.
You just can't listen and digest facts can you? Her citizenship is gone and so is she. You can't lie to get papers and enjoy them forever. She said she was a minor and she wasn't. Oopsy Daisy! Bye bye now vile cunt. Give my regards to the war lords while they're enjoying your company.
The pure insanity from Censored is just sad.
Ever notice every Dick you know is a full-blown moron? Poor Dick is still mainlining so much libtard crack he can't tell a felony from a typo. He actually thinks Omar just made a little oopsie on her age, then another accidental oopsie by marrying her own brother, and yet another oopsie when she thought she was worth 30 million for a minute. After a legal request for her father's naturalization docs, a year of delays later the State finally responded, 'Sorry, there are no records of Ilhan's daddy ever becoming a citizen.' So many oopsies, but nothing to worry about, supporters like Dick are so stupid they'll literally believe anything they're told.
If Ilhan's despicable scumbag murderous war criminal daddy actually was naturalized, whoever approved it should be in jail too. We generally don't let war criminals running from justice in their country come here and become citizens, unless you have a senile president with an autopen working overtime. Here's where Dick and the other libtards claim that Trump is a war criminal for protecting America. Comparing a guy that ordered the brutal death and rapes of innocent women and children to a president that orders our military to take out terrorists attempting to flood our streets with actual deadly poison.
The only question left is whether she should do a few years in prison and then get deported the same day she walks out, or we just put her on the next plane home asap. I can't decide what I'd do. What do you guys think?
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
its not legal if there is fraud in the paper work.
citizenship revoked. traitor deported. end of story.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
Librtlover
Verified User
I don't rely on cult delusions like you do. I rely on facts.
Fact - Ilhan Omar is a US citizen
Fact - The only way to remove citizenship from a US citizen without them personally renouncing that citizenship is through a court proceeding.
Fact - There has been no court proceeding so she is still a US citizen.
This has to do with removing citizenship. That REQUIRES a court ruling. It's the f-ing law.
She has been a citizen for over 10 years so the criminal revocation is not available. Civil revocation requires filing in federal court. All federal civil cases allow for a jury. (See Constitution)
Here is the relevant policy from USCIS - They are required to follow their policies.
Chapter 2 - Revocation of Naturalization
A. BackgroundRevocation of naturalization is sometimes referred to as “denaturalization.” A person’s naturalization can be revoked either by a criminal conviction or
www.uscis.gov
Revocation of naturalization is sometimes referred to as “denaturalization.” A person’s naturalization can be revoked either by a criminal conviction or a civil proceeding.
For criminal revocation of naturalization, the U.S. Attorney’s Office files criminal charges in Federal District Court.[1] For criminal revocation of naturalization the burden of proof is the same as for every other criminal case, proof beyond a reasonable doubt. There is a 10-year statute of limitations for criminal denaturalization.
For civil revocation of naturalization, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) must file the revocation of naturalization action in Federal District Court.
The government holds a high burden of proof when attempting to revoke a person’s naturalization. For civil revocation of naturalization, the burden of proof is clear, convincing, and unequivocal evidence which does not leave the issue in doubt.
Even if there is fraud, she is still a citizen. That is how it works.
In the case of fraud, there is a 10 year statute of limitations. She has been a citizen longer than 10 years. So you can't accuse of a crime to remove her citizenship.
Since you can't use the criminal part of denaturalization you are stuck with the civil procedure. You are wrong. My guess is it will never make it to court because no lawyer will be willing to lose their license by bringing it. It will be interesting to see what the IG says when they investigate this.
Chapter 2 - Revocation of Naturalization
A. BackgroundRevocation of naturalization is sometimes referred to as “denaturalization.” A person’s naturalization can be revoked either by a criminal conviction or
www.uscis.gov
For civil revocation of naturalization, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) must file the revocation of naturalization action in Federal District Court.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
nope.Even if there is fraud, she is still a citizen. That is how it works.
In the case of fraud, there is a 10 year statute of limitations. She has been a citizen longer than 10 years. So you can't accuse of a crime to remove her citizenship.
Since you can't use the criminal part of denaturalization you are stuck with the civil procedure. You are wrong. My guess is it will never make it to court because no lawyer will be willing to lose their license by bringing it. It will be interesting to see what the IG says when they investigate this.
Chapter 2 - Revocation of Naturalization
A. BackgroundRevocation of naturalization is sometimes referred to as “denaturalization.” A person’s naturalization can be revoked either by a criminal conviction orwww.uscis.gov
For civil revocation of naturalization, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) must file the revocation of naturalization action in Federal District Court.
shes gone definitely from Congress. that a good enough.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
shes disappeared from the campaign trail and is being brought up on multiple charges and will probably flee on her own.
the whole omar tribe is getting raided.
welcome to reciprocal lawfare, terrorist supporter.
Wrong Way Wally, pay attention, President Trump did not lie on his immigration form and marry a family member to enter the US illegally.
Indeed. Poor Wrong Way Wally.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
Even if there is fraud, she is still a citizen. That is how it works.
In the case of fraud, there is a 10 year statute of limitations. She has been a citizen longer than 10 years. So you can't accuse of a crime to remove her citizenship.
Since you can't use the criminal part of denaturalization you are stuck with the civil procedure. You are wrong. My guess is it will never make it to court because no lawyer will be willing to lose their license by bringing it. It will be interesting to see what the IG says when they investigate this.
Chapter 2 - Revocation of Naturalization
A. BackgroundRevocation of naturalization is sometimes referred to as “denaturalization.” A person’s naturalization can be revoked either by a criminal conviction orwww.uscis.gov
For civil revocation of naturalization, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) must file the revocation of naturalization action in Federal District Court.
- Action: The Republican-led U.S. House voted to remove Rep. Ilhan Omar from her seat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
| 119th CONGRESS 1st Session |
Censuring Representative Ilhan Omar of Minnesota and removing her from the Committee on Education and Workforce and the Committee on the Budget.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
September 15, 2025
Ms. Mace submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ethics
RESOLUTION
Censuring Representative Ilhan Omar of Minnesota and removing her from the Committee on Education and Workforce and the Committee on the Budget.
- Whereas Charlie Kirk was a lifelong advocate for freedom of speech, civil political discourse, and the political engagement of youth;
Whereas Charlie Kirk was a man of deep faith, a husband, and a father to two young children;
Whereas, on September 10, 2025, Charlie Kirk was assassinated on the campus of Utah Valley University while exercising his First Amendment right to freedom of speech;
Whereas, on September 11, 2025, one day after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, Representative Ilhan Omar gave an interview on a Zeteo Town Hall with Mehdi Hasan in which she smeared Charlie Kirk and implied he was to blame for his own murder;
Whereas, on September 12, 2025, two days after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, Representative Ilhan Omar reposted a video on X (formerly known as Twitter), which disparaged the character of Charlie Kirk and those mourning his death;
Whereas the video Representative Ilhan Omar reposted on X states “Charlie Kirk is dead, and before the body got cold, the far Right propped his corpse up as a cudgel for their holy war”;
Whereas the video Representative Ilhan Omar reposted on X further states “Don't be fooled, these people don't give a single shit about Charlie Kirk, they are just using his death to further their Christofascist agenda”;
Whereas the video Representative Ilhan Omar reposted on X further states Charlie Kirk “was a reprehensible human being. He enacted his political agenda by preying on weak minded people. He took complex socioeconomic issues and simplified them by pointing fingers at out-groups, demonizing those groups, and siccing his massive following on them”;
Whereas the video Representative Ilhan Omar reposted on X further states Charlie Kirk was a “stochastic terrorist, an adamant transphobe, he denied the genocide happening in Palestine, he believed in the subjugation of women, and in his last dying words he was spewing racist dog whistles”;
Whereas the video Representative Ilhan Omar reposted on X further states “Charlie Kirk was Dr. Frankenstein and his monster shot him through the neck”;
Whereas the video Representative Ilhan Omar reposted on X further blames Charlie Kirk for his own murder;
Whereas clause 1 of rule XXIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives provides, “A Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, officer, or employee of the House shall behave at all times in a manner that shall reflect creditably on the House”; and
Whereas Representative Ilhan Omar's actions in the wake of the assassination of Charlie Kirk are reprehensible and affect the dignity and integrity of the proceedings of the House and do not reflect credibility on the House: Now, therefore, be it
(1) Representative Ilhan Omar of Minnesota be censured;
(2) Representative Ilhan Omar forthwith present herself in the well of the House of Representatives for the pronouncement of censure;
(3) Representative Ilhan Omar be censured with the public reading of this resolution by the Speaker; and
(4) Representative Ilhan Omar be, and is hereby, removed from the Committee on Education and Workforce and the Committee on the Budget of the House.K