Federal judge rules Rachel Maddow's show is not legitimate news

[artichoke]

fuck you. you can have news and OPINIONS at the same time, stupid fuck.

So the next time Democrats rush in to hyperventilate over an article being used for a thread that is an opinion article, as if assertions made in opinion articles cannot be true, I will direct them to YOU to learn that they are "stupid fucks."

all media gets some stories wrong

But yours seem to have a special talent for it. When does Maddow get her first story RIGHT?

 

[artichoke]

Let us see ... you are trying to change the subject ...

Since you didn't peruse the article ... let me help you out so you might understand ... FROM THE ARTCLE ...

"Greenwald noted that a similar argument was used in the successful dismissal of a defamation lawsuit against Tucker Carlson and Fox News back in September—which the left exploited by claiming that “Fox admits that Carlson is a liar who cannot be believed!” Carlson had said that former model Karen McDougal “extorted” President Trump for wanting compensation in exchange for her silence about an alleged extramarital affair she claims she had with him."

Let us TRY to stay on topic ... which in this case is the ho named maddow

Excellent callout of martin's Whataboutism fallacy.

 

[artichoke]

and you and pj media are doing the same here with maddow, except what she said is true even if her opinion, and think it is okay for maddow, but not for lying ass Tucker?

Tucker was proven right and Maddow was proven wrong on:

-the "Trump cleared out a protest to give a speech" hoax
-the Russia collusion hoax
-the "Trump told people to drink Lysol" hoax
-the Covington Catholic hoax
-the Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax
-the Roy Moore pedophile hoax
-the Kavanaugh rape gang hoax
-the "repealing Net Neutrality will destroy the Internet" hoax
-the Hydroxchloroquine hoax
-the Jussie Smollett hoax
-the "Investigating Biden's corruption is worse than Biden BEING corrupt" hoax
-the Ukraine transcript hoax
-the Duke Lacrosse team hoax
-the Trayvon Martin hoax
-the "uninsured crisis" hoax
-the multitude of college hate crime hoaxes
-the "deceptively edited video" Planned Parenthood hoax
-the "children in cages" hoax
-the Michael Cohen perjury/contacting the Russians hoaxes
-the SPLC "hate group" hoax
-the "Trump mocking people with disabilities" hoax
-the "you can keep your doctor" hoax
-the "immigrants are rapists, criminals, animals" hoax
-the Kavanaugh "white power symbol" hoax
-the "Trump asked Putin to hack the DNC" hoax
-the polar bear dying from climate change hoax
-the "Trump made it easier for the mentally ill to purchase guns" hoax
-the Scaramucci Russian bankers hoax
-the "Muslim ban" hoax
-the global warming "consensus" hoax
-the "Obama's scandal-free presidency" hoax
-the Trump Jr. WikiLeaks hoax
-the Iran nuclear appeasement hoax
-the "polls show Trump will lose" hoax
-the "Obamacare will never fund abortions or illegal immigrants" hoax
-the "Hillary exonerated" hoax
-the "white privilege" hoax
-the voter suppression hoax
-the "hands up don't shoot" hoax
-the "Trump called soldiers losers" hoax
-the "peaceful protesters" hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi eagle" hoax
-the "Trump ignored Russia putting bounties on U.S. soldiers" hoax
-the coronavirus hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi red triangle" hoax
-the "Trump admitted to sexual assault" hoax
-the "penises cause climate change" hoax
-the "Trump denying passports to Latinos" hoax
-the "Mission Accomplished" hoax

And no, only Democrats think it is okay for one opinion journalist to express opinions (Maddow) and not the others (Hannity and Tucker).

 

[artichoke]

Try comprehending what I write before you continue to make yourself look foolish ... AGAIN

 

[artichoke]

What you post is pure baloney, and anyone who believes what you post is not too bright.

You come to a debate site...to avoid debating everyone and toss around low-IQ personal attacks. THAT'S what indicates not being too bright.

 

[artichoke]

Only a dimwit believes what PJ Media prints without questioning first.

Only a dimwit believes ANYTHING ANY media source prints without questioning it first.

 

[artichoke]

Living in FantasyLand is easier and is more fun...this explains everything.

This is why this GIF is the one I use the most often on here. It best captures the left's state of mind as demonstrated by their posts at every turn.

 

[artichoke]

Does this cunt ever have a thought of her own?

Serious question.

I mean, a lot of her conspiracy theories are things that only a complete degenerate would dream up. Does that count?

 

[artichoke]

Here you are quoting from a well known unreliable source of news(PJ Media), like it's the true gospel, so, me calling your tripe baloney is justifiable.

Notice, the slavish Democrat can only comprehend something being accurate or true if some perceived authority tells them it is okay to think that thought, while the conservative does not need anyone else's permission to think for themselves and can demonstrate on their own whose assertions are accurate and honest versus otherwise.

 

[Althea]

Maddow's target audience is 25-45 year old women who don't follow politics. Her opening segment is horribly redundant, and is always much better when someone sits in for her. For those of us who just want facts, sans affect, she's unbearable.

As an interviewer, she's one of the best. She's the polar opposite of Chis Matthews, who used to use guests as props to be asked questions only to be interrupted the moment they attempted to answer.

Maddow asks pertinent questions, and allows her guests the ability to articulate their response without interruption. She begins by asking what she got wrong, if anything, in the introduction.

I typically don't watch due to the aforementioned redundancy. As far as facts, any claims of overt lying in nonsense. She has run with breaking stories, only to offer retractions immediately if developments bear out a different set of facts.

 

[artichoke]

Maddow's target audience is 25-45 year old women who don't follow politics.

It's a good thing too, with how much she gets wrong and lies about.

Her opening segment is horribly redundant, and is always much better when someone sits in for her. For those of us who just want facts, sans affect, she's unbearable.

As an interviewer, she's one of the best. She's the polar opposite of Chis Matthews, who used to use guests as props to be asked questions only to be interrupted the moment they attempted to answer.

Maddow asks pertinent questions, and allows her guests the ability to articulate their response without interruption. She begins by asking what she got wrong, if anything, in the introduction.

And the answer is always every part of everything.

I typically don't watch due to the aforementioned redundancy. As far as facts, any claims of overt lying in nonsense.

Nope, she absolutely DOES flat-out lie (in addition to her always hilariously wrong predictions). This whole thread is BASED on a lawsuit over her intentionally lying to smear OANN News as being paid by Russia.

Maddow Tells Viewers Taxes Going Up (80 Percent Of Taxpayers Actually Get A Tax Cut)

Rachel Maddow’s 17 Most Audacious and Paranoid Russia Hoax Lies

Lies, Damned Lies, & Rachel Maddow

 

[martin]

fuck you. you can have news and OPINIONS at the same time, stupid fuck. all media gets some stories wrong, but not very often, if credible, and quick to admit and apologize. fox ran with the stupid fuck Hillary/Obama called for stand down orders in benghazi for 73 shows.

Relax or if you can't relax shove your personal insults up your ass. If you "have news and OPINIONS at the same time", by definition you're not a news show. A new shows has news without opinions. Even Maddow would say her show isn't a "news" show and I imagine that is what her lawyers argued though not in the crass terms employed by our hopeless thread starter. She's a television version of a newspaper columnist. MSNBC does not have even one straight news program. It does have the most balanced and intelligent discussion format, better than CNN's in my opinion and a world better than FOX's.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

How often is this woman right about anything?

math says you cannot divide by zero......

 

[PostmodernProphet]

the claims we’ve checked

then there's the other 99.9% of the things reported on Fox News......

 

[artichoke]

A new shows has news without opinions.

In theory, but NEVER in practice.

Even Maddow would say her show isn't a "news" show and I imagine that is what her lawyers argued though not in the crass terms employed by our hopeless thread starter.

Well, yeah. They tried to put a positive spin on saying she shouldn't be held accountable for outright slander as a fake news "journalist," but everyone got what was being admitted to.

She's a television version of a newspaper columnist. MSNBC does not have even one straight news program. It does have the most balanced and intelligent discussion format, better than CNN's in my opinion and a world better than FOX's.

Yes, you can hear a nutjob racist debate a Marxist and a moderate Democrat. You know, all sides of the story covered.

What a crack-smoker.

 

[artichoke]

math says you cannot divide by zero......

 

[Hoosier Daddy]

Relax or if you can't relax shove your personal insults up your ass. If you "have news and OPINIONS at the same time", by definition you're not a news show. A new shows has news without opinions. Even Maddow would say her show isn't a "news" show and I imagine that is what her lawyers argued though not in the crass terms employed by our hopeless thread starter. She's a television version of a newspaper columnist. MSNBC does not have even one straight news program. It does have the most balanced and intelligent discussion format, better than CNN's in my opinion and a world better than FOX's.

you are wrong, dumbass. name any well known newscaster who DID NOT OPINE FROM TIME TO TIME, along with the straight news reporting. stupid fuck. hell, you could read the news if the words were not too tough....from edward r. murrow to cronkite to rather to maddow, incredibly informed dedicated journalists who also commented on the news when they felt the need. of course maddow is way more opinionated on air than the other guys, cable news has changed that aspect, but SHE STILL DOES NOT LIE LIKE THE STUPID FUCK FOX TALKING HEADS AND THAT WAS THE POINT, BOY.

 

[Concart]

Wow, alert the media. LOL, what a dumb fucking thread. Of course it isn't news. No one ever claimed it was.

 

[artichoke]

you are wrong, dumbass. name any well known newscaster who DID NOT OPINE FROM TIME TO TIME, along with the straight news reporting. stupid fuck. hell, you could read the news if the words were not too tough....from edward r. murrow to cronkite to rather to maddow, incredibly informed dedicated journalists who also commented on the news when they felt the need. of course maddow is way more opinionated on air than the other guys, cable news has changed that aspect, but SHE STILL DOES NOT LIE LIKE THE STUPID FUCK FOX TALKING HEADS AND THAT WAS THE POINT, BOY.

I had no idea this would turn into this.

 

[artichoke]

Wow, alert the media. LOL, what a dumb fucking thread. Of course it isn't news. No one ever claimed it was.

Wow, alert the hysterically angry leftists responding to this thread. Apparently THEY think it's news.