Federal judge rules Rachel Maddow's show is not legitimate news
- Thread starter artichoke
- Start date
You shouldn't pretend that you have a mind, we all know better.
But, that's clearly the logic behind what WAS said, so this distinction you're trying to make is moon. No one is being played.
You're just denying reality, as usual.
Be sure to tell Desh, she loves yammering about "court records".
They both have committed the heresy of imperfect moral thoughts or words (as defined by the most immoral left-wing scumbags among us) once or twice. Apparently Democrat privilege even extends to the cancel culture's own lynch mobs.
"The threshold question “in a defamation claim is ‘whether a reasonable factfinder could conclude that the contested statement implies an assertion of objective fact.’ If the answer is no, the claim is foreclosed by the First Amendment.” Gardner v. Martino, 563 F.3d 981, 987 (9th Cir. 2009). This is because “‘pure opinion’—that is, statements that do not imply facts capable of being proved true or false” is protected. Unelko Corp. v. Rooney, 912 F.2d 1049, 1053 n.2 (9th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 961 (1991).
https://timesofsandiego.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/MADDOW-DISMISS.pdf
My entourage of butthurt stalkers still following me from thread to thread whining at everything I say.
Ellen DEGENERATE is literally canceled.
https://nypost.com/2021/05/12/ellen-degeneres-ending-show-after-19-seasons/
Good, the blonde photo negative of Richard Maddow was not funny, not interesting, and apparently was a real psycho on set.
Yakuda
Verified User
Did you even read the court decision? No you didn't. The judge stated the maddcow engages in opinion and not news and a reasonable person can see that. She isn't a news person shes a loud mouth moron with opinions. Big fucking deal.
Democrats should try reading sometime. They would humiliate themselves arguing provably false things less. At least in theory, they still have to be able to COMPREHEND what they read, which is far from safe to assume will happen.
Democrats should try reading sometime. They would humiliate themselves arguing provably false things less. At least in theory, they still have to be able to COMPREHEND what they read, which is far from safe to assume will happen.
How damn wrong can you be? If you were watching the election returns, you would have heard network after network say the Dem vote, much of it by mail-in was coming after the polls closed. The city vote is always later than rural. Do you know that much?
Tell me how truckloads if votes are counted. You do not know how the system works. Every vote has to appear in the registration books in precincts. You do not get a truckload of votes counted. They have no name on the books. They are only marked as voted once. They cannot use the same name multiple times.
You believe an obvious lie.
Many states do not allow the voter comm. to count mail-ins before the polls close. They pile up until polls close and then they start the count.
What is wrong with you rightys? Can you understand anything that goes against your beliefs?
ExpressLane
Verified User
Federal judge rules Rachel Maddow's show is not legitimate news
Say it ain't so 
In other news Federal judge rules water is wet.
Say it ain't so In other news Federal judge rules water is wet.
I mean, not "Russia collusion hoax" wrong, but I could be pretty wrong if I tried to be dishonest on a Democrat scale. And the ballots coming in late was the point to Democrats insisting that you could shop and dine in public, but somehow not vote due to COVID. COVID was scaremongered to enable mail-in voting, which Democrats spent DECADES insisting was a recipe for election theft before deciding to use it to steal the presidency.
Sure, but what DOESN'T always happen is shutting down vote-counting only in Democrat-run places until truckloads of only Biden ballots (statistically impossible) could be "found," doing a sudden 180 to the results, creating 20 million more votes than voters, "correcting" the outcome only in Biden's favor in every single location...even as he lost almost all the counties Obama gained, tons of black and Latino votes, and as Democrats were getting creamed in Congress.
If you can pretend away that many mathematically impossible miracles, you are a dishonest hack or a brainwashed imbecile.
THAT'S your big counterpoint? Focusing on my use of the word "truckloads" to indicate massive amounts of votes?
That's fucking idiotic.
That's funny, because there are witnesses from both sides who signed sworn affidavits under penalty of perjury stating that they watched Democrats feed the same ballots in hundreds of times, throw military ballots in dumpsters, wheel suitcases of fake votes into secured vote-counting places, instruct postal workers to backdate entire pallets of fake ballots, etc.
As if we needed to hear anyone else say it, even an Obama-appointed federal judge has now ruled that Rachel Maddow's show and parent company cannot be sued for blatantly lying about people because it is clear to anyone who watches her show that it is "make up whatever we feel like" opinion instead of fact-based reporting.
"The Obama-appointed judge Cynthia Bashant dismissed the defamation lawsuit on the grounds that Maddow’s audience knows she’s hyperpartisan, and thus, as Greenwald put it, that her audience “understands that her show consists of exaggeration, hyperbole, and pure opinion, and therefore would not assume that such outlandish accusations are factually true even when she uses the language of certainty and truth when presenting them"
Judge Rules Rachel Maddow's Show Isn't News
Where would we be without you telling us the obvious?
evince
Truthmatters
As if we needed to hear anyone else say it, even an Obama-appointed federal judge has now ruled that Rachel Maddow's show and parent company cannot be sued for blatantly lying about people because it is clear to anyone who watches her show that it is "make up whatever we feel like" opinion instead of fact-based reporting.
"The Obama-appointed judge Cynthia Bashant dismissed the defamation lawsuit on the grounds that Maddow’s audience knows she’s hyperpartisan, and thus, as Greenwald put it, that her audience “understands that her show consists of exaggeration, hyperbole, and pure opinion, and therefore would not assume that such outlandish accusations are factually true even when she uses the language of certainty and truth when presenting them"
Judge Rules Rachel Maddow's Show Isn't News
Fucking liar
It’s news and commentary
He clearly said she delivers NEWS
YOU TRUMP TURDS ARE LYING SHIT PILES
Federal judge rules Rachel Maddow's show is not legitimate news
In other news Federal judge rules water is wet.
Exactly. So why is Armpit telling us the obvious? The ruling was made so that nobody can sue Maddow for defamation. That's all there is to it.