I mean don't lie to defend pathologically dishonest scumbags and and scam-artists if you don't want to get blasted with the proof that she (and you) blatantly lie, which apparently now constitutes being "triggered" (weak).
Garbage in, garbage out.
Federal judge rules Rachel Maddow's show is not legitimate news
- Thread starter artichoke
- Start date
I mean don't lie to defend pathologically dishonest scumbags and and scam-artists if you don't want to get blasted with the proof that she (and you) blatantly lie, which apparently now constitutes being "triggered" (weak).
Garbage in, garbage out.
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
I mean don't lie to defend pathologically dishonest scumbags and and scam-artists if you don't want to get blasted with the proof that she (and you) blatantly lie, which apparently now constitutes being "triggered" (weak).
Garbage in, garbage out.
Just calm down Arminius! Ranting is not going to work for you or anyone else- it just looks silly and weak and it is not even good for your well-being!
Have you ever heard of getting a breath of fresh air!?
Try it. PLEASE!
Ah, playing the child's game of assigning me the role of being triggered, despite nothing indicating that, to position yourself as a troll getting under people's skin.
How clever and witty.
Newsflash: You don't get under people's skin by TELLING them they're triggered, dumb-ass.
If you have to tell them, you have already failed miserably, shittiest troll ever.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Not seeing anything here. Was an image supposed to load?
Oh, I see it now.
Last edited:
Refresh, dumbass.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Not seeing anything here. Was an image supposed to load?
Oh, I see it now.
Yep, just like Madcow and the truth... It takes a minute and might not ever get there...
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
Ah, playing the child's game of assigning me the role of being triggered, despite nothing indicating that, to position yourself as a troll getting under people's skin.
How clever and witty.
Newsflash: You don't get under people's skin by TELLING them they're triggered, dumb-ass.
If you have to tell them, you have already failed miserably, shittiest troll ever.
We know a rant when we see one!
Yours goes more into a hissy-fit category!
You're triggered and I'm trolling you, I know because I keep telling me.
So desperate and phony.
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
You're triggered and I'm trolling you, I know because I keep telling me.
View attachment 20246
So desperate and phony.
I certainly do not mind your trolling me. You're welcome to troll me all you want.
However, we are talking about serious matter. So perhaps you should put away the charades and be serious for our discussion.
You shouted out a lot of crazy accusations in your thread opener, and I am calling them all BULLSHIT! That's serious when you can't even back up one claim.
Just a RANT, because you Sir are TRIGGERED! The more triggered, the more outrageous and preposterous your claims. YOU JUST DON'T DO TRIGGERED WELL.
So Please- a little less triggered and a little less outrageous please! It would serve you best regarding your own integrity.
Or you can simply keep starting TROLLING THREADS like this one. It's your reputation at stake here.
You said- "With most the votes counted & Trump way ahead, Democrat states stopped counting until they "found" truckloads of only Biden ballots in the middle of the night, only in precincts notorious for Democrat voter fraud, only exactly where Democrats needed them to show up, doing a 180 to the results, exploding vote totals way past 100%"
And I am calling your thread a failure, just based on those lies in your opening rant.
I am also calling you a liar with a huge imagination to even be able to concoct such manure as this.
Last edited:
Into the Night
Verified User
As if we needed to hear anyone else say it, even an Obama-appointed federal judge has now ruled that Rachel Maddow's show and parent company cannot be sued for blatantly lying about people because it is clear to anyone who watches her show that it is "make up whatever we feel like" opinion instead of fact-based reporting.
"The Obama-appointed judge Cynthia Bashant dismissed the defamation lawsuit on the grounds that Maddow’s audience knows she’s hyperpartisan, and thus, as Greenwald put it, that her audience “understands that her show consists of exaggeration, hyperbole, and pure opinion, and therefore would not assume that such outlandish accusations are factually true even when she uses the language of certainty and truth when presenting them"
Judge Rules Rachel Maddow's Show Isn't News
Still liable for slander.
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
BULLSHIT!
A judge ordered the parent company for right-wing cable network One America News Network to pay MSNBC and host Rachel Maddow nearly $250,000 in legal fees after a failed defamation lawsuit.
Herring Networks, which owns OAN, sued MSNBC for $10 million in September 2019 following a segment on Maddow's show, in which she said OAN "really literally is paid Russian propaganda." The network called the claims "malicious" and "utterly and completely false" and said it had never received money from Russia or its government, according to legal documents obtained by USA TODAY.
U.S. District Judge Cynthia Bashant ruled last May that "no set of facts that could support a claim for defamation based on Maddow's statement." After NBC Universal, MSNBC and Maddow asked for nearly $350,000 in legal fees, the court permanently dismissed the case and on Friday awarded the defendants $247,667.50.
“This ruling reflects that One America News’ lawsuit is totally baseless, and we expect to continue to prevail on appeal," read a statement provided to USA TODAY by MSNBC spokesperson Lorie Acio.
OAN president Charles Herring said in a statement that the network is "pleased that the fees were reduced by nearly a third by the court. The case is currently under appeal and we’re highly confident that we’ll receive a favorable and just ruling in the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.”
In a 2019 letter to OAN, Amy Wolf, a counselor for NBCUniversal, MSNBC's parent company, argued that Maddow's comment was a "protected opinion based on disclosed facts" following a Daily Beast article that reported OAN reporter Kristian Rouz was also paid to write for Sputnik, which is funded by the Russian government.
"We literally learned today that that outlet the president is promoting shares staff with the Kremlin," Maddow said in a July 22, 2019, episode. "In this case, the most obsequiously pro-Trump right wing news outlet in America really literally is paid Russian propaganda. The on air U.S. politics reporter is paid by the Russian government to produce propaganda for that government."
NBC Universal's letter argued that "Ms. Maddow's comment could not have been reasonably understood to mean that the Russian government made checks payable to OAN; indeed, she specifically noted who was paid by Sputnik. Use of the word 'literally' here is the kind of figure of speech that connotes opinion and thus cannot give rise to a defamation claim."
So the case has been appealed to the 9th Circuit Appellate Court of Appeals! BUT MADDOW TOLD THE TRUTH AND IT IS NOW FACT and PUBLIC DOMAIN INFORMATION- That Russia pays OAN to run FAKE NEWS STORIES!
The case will be laughed out of court! AND OAN WILL BE PAYING NBC"S ATTORNEY FEES ALL OVER AGAIN! LOL!
Last edited:
I mean, if laughing at your shittiest trolling attempt in history constitutes "trolling," sure.
There is nothing serious about Rachel Maddow, other than her ability to so fundamentally misinform all five of her viewers on everything that's happening.
Says the guy who I'm only laughing at in the first place because he just got done trying awfully to troll me.
Way to think it through, genius.
*
*
*
Notice how you constantly accuse others of misrepresenting things but all the actual distortions end up being YOURS?
Next.
All one of them?
This just in: Posting four separate links of lists and examples of her wildly biased, dishonest coverage is now "not backing up one claim."
Newsflash: You don't just get to randomly make up whatever you feel like.
And now we've come full circle back to your original phony posturing that started this self-discrediting humiliation spree.
What else you got there, Captain Literacy?
...because she's tabloid trash fake news that no one can be expected to take seriously, so she gets to intentionally slander people.
THAT'S what you're trying to congratulate yourself over as if it's some kind of victory.
Actually no, that's what the ruling found. The judge literally used the words "pure opinion" to describe her "coverage" (repeatedly humiliated conspiracy theories and lies). So for being an even bigger scumbag than CNN, she gets LESS accountability.
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
...because she's tabloid trash fake news that no one can be expected to take seriously, so she gets to intentionally slander people.
THAT'S what you're trying to congratulate yourself over as if it's some kind of victory.
Rachel's show is no. 1 for a reason. Because she is a good investigative reporter. She runs breaking news stories mostly every night.
She uses facts- She tells us what people are being investigated for, she makes no assessments of her own but rather leaves it up to what the investigations is producing as facts and reports on those.
NOTHING FAKE NEWS ABOUT IT. THIS IS WHY PEOPLE THINK THEY CAN CHALLENGE HER IN COURT, BUT THEY CAN'T SO FAR AS WHAT SHE SAYS IS TRUE AND BACKED UP WITH FACTS!
Tell us one thing she said that is not true!
IT'S OK IF YOU CAN'T!
WE UNDERSTAND!
That is the same argument Sidney Powell is using in Dominion's defamation suit against her.
It is also the same argument Fox lawyers made in their defense of Tucker Carlson when Karen McDougal sued him for saying she tried to extort President Trump.
Thursday, July 8 Scoreboard: Fox News Averages More Total Primetime Viewers Than CNN and MSNBC Combined
Do you EVER tire of humiliating yourself regurgitating wildly ignorant spoon-fed misinformation?
Hence her losing half her audience overnight when Mueller contradicted everything she had spent YEARS blatantly lying to her audience about.
Maddow Tells Viewers Taxes Going Up (80 Percent Of Taxpayers Actually Get A Tax Cut)
Rachel Maddow’s 17 Most Audacious and Paranoid Russia Hoax Lies
Lies, Damned Lies, & Rachel Maddow
We get it. You guzzle the Kool-Aid like the world's most gifted porn star swallowing the fire hydrant that is Hulk.