Fewer and Fewer Students Earn Degrees in the Humanities

20 years ago, nearly 15% of the undergraduate degrees conferred in the United States were in the humanities. As of 2025, that percentage is down to 8.1%.

Maybe there aren't many jobs that want those "skills".
 
Never were.

Weren't there?

Were there many job opportunities in the past for undergraduates with a degree in the humanities?



Yes — relative to the size of the college-educated population and the structure of the labor market, there were more straightforward job paths for humanities BAs in the mid-20th century than there are now.

The picture is not “everyone with an English degree walked into a great career,” but a bachelor’s in history, English, philosophy, or languages was a more reliable general-purpose credential than it is today.


Why the market looked better then​


A college degree itself was scarce. In 1960 only about 8% of U.S. adults held a bachelor’s degree; by 1970 it was still only 11%. Today it is roughly 38%. When few people had any four-year degree, employers treated the BA as a broad signal of literacy, reasoning, and reliability. Major mattered less.


The biggest single destination was teaching.

The postwar baby boom produced a long teacher shortage that lasted into the late 1960s.

Elementary and secondary enrollments exploded while the supply of new teachers (many of them humanities majors) lagged. School districts hired aggressively; certification was often obtainable after a BA plus a relatively short additional program. Humanities fields fed that pipeline directly.

The surplus only became obvious around 1969–70, when the baby-boom cohort finished pre-college school and the number of education graduates kept rising.


Other common paths were also more open:


  • Government and civil-service jobs that valued a general liberal-arts education.
  • Management-trainee and white-collar programs at large companies that hired “college men” (and later women) without requiring a business major.
  • Journalism, publishing, insurance, sales, and later law school. A 1950s study of English majors from several Midwestern colleges found them scattered across business, education, journalism/writing, law, medicine, ministry, and government — not clustered in one narrow occupation.

Humanities degrees themselves were also a larger share of the pie. Their share of all bachelor’s degrees peaked around 1967 at 17%; history BAs hit an all-time high of about 44,700 in 1971 and have never returned to that number.


What changed​


The 1970s broke the pattern. Teacher demand flattened, college enrollment growth slowed, and the number of new PhDs (especially in history and English) far outstripped academic openings — creating a well-documented “lost generation” of historians. For undergraduates the change was slower but real: more people earned BAs, professional and vocational majors expanded, and employers began asking more often for a specific major plus internships or technical skills.


Today humanities graduates still work. Unemployment for established humanities BAs is close to the rate for other college graduates and far below the rate for people with only a high-school diploma. Common destinations remain education, management, legal occupations (usually after further schooling), government, communications, HR, and nonprofits. Mid-career earnings typically sit below STEM and some business fields but well above non-graduates; many humanities majors who later earn a graduate or professional degree close much of the gap.


The difference is that the default path is no longer as clear or as cheap. Tuition is higher, the BA is common rather than distinctive, and students (and parents) now expect a more visible line from major to job. That expectation is what makes the older market look comparatively generous.



Most go to grad school.

What choice do they have?
 
Weren't there?

Were there many job opportunities in the past for undergraduates with a degree in the humanities?



Yes — relative to the size of the college-educated population and the structure of the labor market, there were more straightforward job paths for humanities BAs in the mid-20th century than there are now.

The picture is not “everyone with an English degree walked into a great career,” but a bachelor’s in history, English, philosophy, or languages was a more reliable general-purpose credential than it is today.


Why the market looked better then​


A college degree itself was scarce. In 1960 only about 8% of U.S. adults held a bachelor’s degree; by 1970 it was still only 11%. Today it is roughly 38%. When few people had any four-year degree, employers treated the BA as a broad signal of literacy, reasoning, and reliability. Major mattered less.


The biggest single destination was teaching.

The postwar baby boom produced a long teacher shortage that lasted into the late 1960s.

Elementary and secondary enrollments exploded while the supply of new teachers (many of them humanities majors) lagged. School districts hired aggressively; certification was often obtainable after a BA plus a relatively short additional program. Humanities fields fed that pipeline directly.

The surplus only became obvious around 1969–70, when the baby-boom cohort finished pre-college school and the number of education graduates kept rising.


Other common paths were also more open:


  • Government and civil-service jobs that valued a general liberal-arts education.
  • Management-trainee and white-collar programs at large companies that hired “college men” (and later women) without requiring a business major.
  • Journalism, publishing, insurance, sales, and later law school. A 1950s study of English majors from several Midwestern colleges found them scattered across business, education, journalism/writing, law, medicine, ministry, and government — not clustered in one narrow occupation.

Humanities degrees themselves were also a larger share of the pie. Their share of all bachelor’s degrees peaked around 1967 at 17%; history BAs hit an all-time high of about 44,700 in 1971 and have never returned to that number.


What changed​


The 1970s broke the pattern. Teacher demand flattened, college enrollment growth slowed, and the number of new PhDs (especially in history and English) far outstripped academic openings — creating a well-documented “lost generation” of historians. For undergraduates the change was slower but real: more people earned BAs, professional and vocational majors expanded, and employers began asking more often for a specific major plus internships or technical skills.


Today humanities graduates still work. Unemployment for established humanities BAs is close to the rate for other college graduates and far below the rate for people with only a high-school diploma. Common destinations remain education, management, legal occupations (usually after further schooling), government, communications, HR, and nonprofits. Mid-career earnings typically sit below STEM and some business fields but well above non-graduates; many humanities majors who later earn a graduate or professional degree close much of the gap.


The difference is that the default path is no longer as clear or as cheap. Tuition is higher, the BA is common rather than distinctive, and students (and parents) now expect a more visible line from major to job. That expectation is what makes the older market look comparatively generous.





What choice do they have?
I suppose you never will engage in discussion. I never read that AI crap.
 
Most go to grad school.

Do "most go to grad school" now, as Hume claims?



No. Hume’s line — “Most go to grad school” — overstates both the present and the past.


Right after graduation, most do not.

NACE first-destination surveys consistently put the share of liberal-arts/humanities bachelor’s recipients who are in graduate or professional school six months later in the high teens to mid-20s (roughly 18–28%, depending on year and exact field). Philosophy, history, foreign languages, and English sit at the high end of that range; visual/performing arts sit lower. That is higher than business or engineering, but it is not a majority. Most of those graduates are employed, not in school.


Over a longer window, a majority eventually enroll.

The NCES Baccalaureate and Beyond study of the 2007–08 graduating class found that 57% of humanities BA holders had enrolled in some graduate program within four years. That is well above business (35%) and computer science (28%), close to social sciences (60%), and below the biological/physical sciences (67%).


Completing an advanced degree is less common than enrolling.

Humanities Indicators data for 2021 show 42% of people who majored in the humanities hold at least one advanced degree. A study of history majors found that by age 34 about 52% had earned a graduate credential (roughly 30% a master’s as their highest degree, 16% a professional degree—mostly law—and 6% a doctorate). Philosophy and English majors land in a similar band. Many of those later degrees are in education, law, or other professional fields, not a continuation of the undergraduate humanities major.

So the accurate statement is: humanities BAs are more likely than average to continue their education, and a majority enroll in something within a few years.

That is not the same as “most go to grad school” as the default, immediate next step, and it does not mean the bachelor’s itself has no labor-market use.

Historically the largest single destination for humanities undergraduates was K-12 teaching, which for decades did not require a graduate degree first.
 
I see. Again, you opine with no evidence.
My evidence is your reply in post #3 to the question maybe there arent enough jobs for people with that degree.? You said there neve were so if there were never enough jobs how do that support themselves with a humanities degree?
 
Yes, this is a discussion forum.
What is there to discuss? You apparently dont see a problem with fewer humanities degrees. I personally think its a great thing there are fewer such degrees being perpetrated on the world
 
My evidence is your reply in post #3 to the question maybe there arent enough jobs for people with that degree.? You said there neve were so if there were never enough jobs how do that support themselves with a humanities degree?
The humanities are very large set of disciplines. Again, you need to get an MA or Phd. to be competetive.
 
Do "most go to grad school" now, as Hume claims?



No. Hume’s line — “Most go to grad school” — overstates both the present and the past.


Right after graduation, most do not.

NACE first-destination surveys consistently put the share of liberal-arts/humanities bachelor’s recipients who are in graduate or professional school six months later in the high teens to mid-20s (roughly 18–28%, depending on year and exact field). Philosophy, history, foreign languages, and English sit at the high end of that range; visual/performing arts sit lower. That is higher than business or engineering, but it is not a majority. Most of those graduates are employed, not in school.


Over a longer window, a majority eventually enroll.

The NCES Baccalaureate and Beyond study of the 2007–08 graduating class found that 57% of humanities BA holders had enrolled in some graduate program within four years. That is well above business (35%) and computer science (28%), close to social sciences (60%), and below the biological/physical sciences (67%).


Completing an advanced degree is less common than enrolling.

Humanities Indicators data for 2021 show 42% of people who majored in the humanities hold at least one advanced degree. A study of history majors found that by age 34 about 52% had earned a graduate credential (roughly 30% a master’s as their highest degree, 16% a professional degree—mostly law—and 6% a doctorate). Philosophy and English majors land in a similar band. Many of those later degrees are in education, law, or other professional fields, not a continuation of the undergraduate humanities major.

So the accurate statement is: humanities BAs are more likely than average to continue their education, and a majority enroll in something within a few years.

That is not the same as “most go to grad school” as the default, immediate next step, and it does not mean the bachelor’s itself has no labor-market use.

Historically the largest single destination for humanities undergraduates was K-12 teaching, which for decades did not require a graduate degree first.
What do you do with a womens studies degree?
 
What is there to discuss? You apparently dont see a problem with fewer humanities degrees. I personally think its a great thing there are fewer such degrees being perpetrated on the world
Yes, you hate being educated. I know.
 
Back
Top