Old Trapper
Verified User
It infringes on the 4th. Amendment right.
More like the Fifth.
It infringes on the 4th. Amendment right.
Let me just ask you idiots something!
Let's say, before that shooter killed those 12 innocent victims in California this week, someone had tipped off the police and were able to show the police an Email they received from the shooter, that described the shooters intentions to go into that bar, and kill every one in it, etc.
Do you think the police are just going to say,"Can't do anything here because this individual has 2nd and 4th amendment rights"?
Idiots- the lot of you!
The right to keep and bear arms...shall not be infringed
.
Go fuck fuck yourself.
Maybe you should man up and admit you are stupid. Don't really give a fuck what some other poster said, it was your asinine response to me that shows your a fucking idiot.
No, you're the idiot. Was there any evidence/email or other indication this individual was going to use his guns illegally?
Listen up you retarded idiot, I was speaking generally- not even talking about this individual case.
I used my own examples of how the law works.
If you are too stupid to read my comments thoroughly before you shit yourself, pee you pants, and try to come back at me with some lame ass bullshit, that's on you Fuck Wad!
A guy in bed at 5 in the morning is not an "immediate threat", and confiscating his guns is obviously a punishment for an unknown crime. And using the case of a parolee violating the conditions of his parole is desperation.
Let me just ask you idiots something!
Let's say, before that shooter killed those 12 innocent victims in California this week, someone had tipped off the police and were able to show the police an Email they received from the shooter, that described the shooter's intentions to go into that bar, and kill every one in it, etc.
Do you think the police are just going to say,"Can't do anything here because this individual has 2nd and 4th amendment rights"?
Idiots- the lot of you!
I have never witnessed such stupid idiots that we have here in this forum.
OK, you want to keep using this incident as a shining example of what should have been done- and what not should have been done! GREAT!
BUt first let me tell you what kind of hypocritical idiots you are in the very first place.
Every time a black person gets shot, you racist idiots come up with every excuse in the book, such as, "He shouldn't have run from the police, or he shouldn't have went for his gun, etc.
But when some gun-toting White old-fart idiot, pulls his guns on the police and gets his stupid ass shot, here you go with the double standards.
This man got himself killed by doing something very stupid! He raised a firearm and pointed it at the police!
When that happens, the police have no other option but to shoot the idiot!
Do you think the police are that stupid as to not defend themselves?
Idiots! We are dealing with some serious retardation and stupidity here in this forum!
LOL!! Triggered much? Face it, you don't know what you're babbling about.
This isn't a "general" discussion, it's a discussion about a specific individual killed as his 4th. Amendment right was violated.
Now, who's the asshole?
Listen up you retarded idiot, I was speaking generally- not even talking about this individual case.
I used my own examples of how the law works.
If you are too stupid to read my comments thoroughly before you shit yourself, pee you pants, and try to come back at me with some lame ass bullshit, that's on you Fuck Wad!
Dude, you are the asshole! And a stupid one at that!
Double irony
Maybe you should man up and admit you are stupid. Don't really give a fuck what some other poster said, it was your asinine response to me that shows your a fucking idiot.
If that be true, then how come felons cannot own guns?
Take your Double irony and shove it up your ass!
Actually you are incorrect again.