Florida: The best at being the worst

The note at the bottom also says that the data is suspect all the way around.

You're a liar.

The note at the bottom says that suspect data was EXCLUDED from this analysis by KFF.

You can't read...or you rush through what you read and don't comprehend it.

The reason you do that is because you are so desperate to be right about something for once in your life that you will completely fuck up a simple reading of a chart just to give yourself unearned confidence.

I'm here to tell you that there's nothing for you to be confident about OTHER THAN the decision to kill yourself as quickly as possible.
 
And the data from those states was left out, YOU FUCKING IMBECILE:

"States were excluded from this analysis where there was a discrepancy of more than 10% between the total number of COVID-19 deaths by age group and the total number of deaths overall in the state."

So the inaccurate data WASN'T INCLUDED IN THIS ANALYSIS YOU FUCKING MORON.

Kill yourself.

Seriously. Someone as fucking stupid and idiotic as yourself cannot come back from this kind of humiliation.

You and TA are sloppy partisan hacks whose instincts are always wrong and whose judgment is always poor.

So now it's time for you to switch to another sock and "start over" with a different stupid argument.

will-ferrel-nope.gif
 
You're a liar.

The note at the bottom says that suspect data was EXCLUDED from this analysis by KFF.

You can't read...or you rush through what you read and don't comprehend it.

The reason you do that is because you are so desperate to be right about something for once in your life that you will completely fuck up a simple reading of a chart just to give yourself unearned confidence.

I'm here to tell you that there's nothing for you to be confident about OTHER THAN the decision to kill yourself as quickly as possible.

Read this chart!

636.png
 
I want everyone to pay attention to the sophistry and conjecture that TA has used as a replacement for a fact-based argument.

See, because he's lazy as shit and a complete partisan hack, he simply can't form a counter argument using data to make the case that he was instinctually right about COVID.

So what he does instead is cast doubt on the data and messenger, that way he doesn't have to address the conclusions because they are too inconvenient for his beliefs.

That's fascism for ya!

Point out anything in any of your posts in this thread, other than the cut and paste graph in post 1 that wasn't an insult, ad hominem, or was an actual fact.
 
Point out anything in any of your posts in this thread, other than the cut and paste graph in post 1 that wasn't an insult, ad hominem, or was an actual fact.

Sure, I love nothing more than repeating my posts where I call out your fucking laziness:

You're a liar.

The note at the bottom says that suspect data was EXCLUDED from this analysis by KFF.

You can't read...or you rush through what you read and don't comprehend it.

The reason you do that is because you are so desperate to be right about something for once in your life that you will completely fuck up a simple reading of a chart just to give yourself unearned confidence.

I'm here to tell you that there's nothing for you to be confident about OTHER THAN the decision to kill yourself as quickly as possible.

So you thought you had something because you misread a chart that you rushed through reading because you can't handle the fact that you're not as smart as you want people to think you are, and the people you consider idiots humiliate you like this DAILY on this board.
 
Sure, I love nothing more than repeating my posts where I call out your fucking laziness:



So you thought you had something because you misread a chart that you rushed through reading because you can't handle the fact that you're not as smart as you want people to think you are, and the people you consider idiots humiliate you like this DAILY on this board.

That's ad hominem followed by an insult. Got anything else?
 
That's ad hominem followed by an insult. Got anything else?

You lied about the data in the chart.

KFF specifically stated that they EXCLUDED that data from the chart.

Obviously, you didn't read that...or you did and didn't understand it because they used words too big like "EXCLUDED".

And now you try to make it about me being mean to you as I correct your error on my thread.

You're a sophist.
 
Shorter TA: "I'm wrong about everything and my instincts suck and my judgment is poor, but LV426 was mean to me when he made all that known, so that's why I have to support fascism."

What a douchebag.
 
You lied about the data in the chart.

KFF specifically stated that they EXCLUDED that data from the chart.

Obviously, you didn't read that...or you did and didn't understand it because they used words too big like "EXCLUDED".

And now you try to make it about me being mean to you as I correct your error on my thread.

You're a sophist.

More ad hominem and insult...
 
More ad hominem and insult...

See, you want people to think you're smart...but when you do things like fuck up reading a chart, it becomes much harder to convince people that you're intelligent.

The "insult" wasn't me calling you names...the "insult" was me correcting your mistake and error on this thread.

That's what set you off.

All this other stuff about ad hominems is superficial and has nothing to do with you being completely fucking wrong, and then being a gigantic fucking baby about it afterwards.
 
Back
Top