GA to conduct full recount by hand

PostmodernProphet said:
I agree that you are foolish to call it interfering instead of a reasonable compromise......or do lib'ruls mistrust the army........perhaps you would be happier if the Chinese counted them......perhaps you could petition the UN to send in a team of workers from China, Cuba, Venezuela and the Sudan........
Click to expand...

Military involvement would be unconstitutional and dangerous. The military would refuse to get involved. If they agreed then no I would not trust them. Sorry, no military dictatorship for you.

I’m not the one who has a problem with the lawful process pal. That would be you.
 
Concart said:
Military involvement would be unconstitutional and dangerous. The military would refuse to get involved. If they agreed then no I would not trust them. Sorry, no military dictatorship for you.

I’m not the one who has a problem with the lawful process pal. That would be you.
Click to expand...

gosh, that is incredibly sad......and I have no problem with the process.......but I certainly wouldn't trust anyone who would post what I just quoted......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
gosh, that is incredibly sad......and I have no problem with the process.......but I certainly wouldn't trust anyone who would post what I just quoted......
Click to expand...

It's not sad. It's being an American. Unlike you. The specter of the military stepping into an election is chilling and frightening to everyone who respects our institutions. You don't. What happened to your belief in states rights? I guess they are okay until they do something you don't like, right sparky? The military understands their role, and they should at all times refuse an unlawful command. Ordering them to participate in the recount of an election is a partisan exercise and military leadership would refuse that order. If they didn't, it would be a strong indication that they had become a political tool at which point there is absolutely no reason to trust them.

As I said before, I'm fine with following the rules, you are the one that wants an extraordinary intervention of the military into our election process. It is unAmerican to the core. You are okay with the process? No you aren't. You're a liar. You've already stated you will not accept the result if Democrats are involved. Typical dishonesty on your part.
 
Concart said:
It's not sad. It's being an American. Unlike you. The specter of the military stepping into an election is chilling and frightening to everyone who respects our institutions. You don't. What happened to your belief in states rights? I guess they are okay until they do something you don't like, right sparky? The military understands their role, and they should at all times refuse an unlawful command. Ordering them to participate in the recount of an election is a partisan exercise and military leadership would refuse that order. If they didn't, it would be a strong indication that they had become a political tool at which point there is absolutely no reason to trust them.

As I said before, I'm fine with following the rules, you are the one that wants an extraordinary intervention of the military into our election process. It is unAmerican to the core. You are okay with the process? No you aren't. You're a liar. You've already stated you will not accept the result if Democrats are involved. Typical dishonesty on your part.
Click to expand...

no......it is not being American.......I didn't suggest ordering the military to go in and shoot Demmycrats.......do you object to the Army Corp of Engineers building levees?.......having an impartial panel of counters under orders to be impartial and count would only be a threat to someone who knows he has something to hide.....I think we should find out what it is..../
 
PostmodernProphet said:
no......it is not being American.......I didn't suggest ordering the military to go in and shoot Demmycrats.......do you object to the Army Corp of Engineers building levees?.......having an impartial panel of counters under orders to be impartial and count would only be a threat to someone who knows he has something to hide.....I think we should find out what it is..../
Click to expand...

The Corp of Engineers is a legitimate purpose for the military. Counting votes in a state election is not. Period. I could not give a FUCK if you are worried someone has something to hide. The votes will be counted. Biden will win the state, and the presidency. And you will be shuffled off to the dustbin of history.

Bye Trumptard.
 
reports say the signature verification process was non-existent in Nevada. Not surprising as Dems agitated for that
 
DonaldvoTrumpovich said:
So you have to play the CF card to feel better about supporting a freaking moron?
And unless you're a moron as well, you know what Trump meant when he said:
"And I then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in one minute, and is there a way you can do something like that by injection inside, or almost a cleaning."

But I don't blame you for the deflection attempt. I'd sure feel like a moron if I voted for a moron who suggested to doctors to inject disinfectant. Just watch the video, son.
I rest my case.
Click to expand...

Inversion fallacy. Contextomy fallacy. Insult fallacies.
 
Concart said:
Military involvement would be unconstitutional and dangerous.
Click to expand...
Nope. Military involvement is allowed by the Constitution and all State constitutions.
Concart said:
The military would refuse to get involved.
Click to expand...
They are already involved. Every soldier can vote. They can also be used to uphold the law.
Concart said:
If they agreed then no I would not trust them. Sorry, no military dictatorship for you.
Click to expand...
A military is not a dictatorship. It is the military, nothing else.
Concart said:
I’m not the one who has a problem with the lawful process pal. That would be you.
Click to expand...
No, that would be YOU. Inversion fallacy.
 
Concart said:
It's not sad. It's being an American. Unlike you. The specter of the military stepping into an election is chilling and frightening to everyone who respects our institutions. You don't. What happened to your belief in states rights? I guess they are okay until they do something you don't like, right sparky? The military understands their role, and they should at all times refuse an unlawful command. Ordering them to participate in the recount of an election is a partisan exercise and military leadership would refuse that order. If they didn't, it would be a strong indication that they had become a political tool at which point there is absolutely no reason to trust them.

As I said before, I'm fine with following the rules, you are the one that wants an extraordinary intervention of the military into our election process. It is unAmerican to the core. You are okay with the process? No you aren't. You're a liar. You've already stated you will not accept the result if Democrats are involved. Typical dishonesty on your part.
Click to expand...

Using the military to uphold the law is legal and safe. The Constitution is the law.
 
Into the Night said:
Inversion fallacy. Contextomy fallacy. Insult fallacies.
Click to expand...

President-elect Joe Biden has officially won Arizona, delivering yet another victory for Democrats.

Biden officially crossed the 270 count in the Electoral College on Saturday after Pennsylvania and Nevada were called for him and Kamala Harris, but the addition of Arizona’s 11 votes to his victory column is historic. The state last voted for a Democrat in 1996 when Ross Perot’s third-party bid helped Bill Clinton defeat Republican Bob Dole. Before that, Arizona hadn’t voted for a Democrat since 1948.

The Arizona result was called by Decision Desk HQ at 8:29 p.m. local time with an estimated 24,738 ballots still left to be counted, according to the state's election tracker.

The announcement comes days after the Associated Press and Fox News that Biden won Arizona, outraging the Trump campaign at what was perceived as an early call. Candidates cannot request recounts in Arizona, and the margin to trigger an automatic recount is a razor-thin 0.1% discrepancy between candidates.

So, do you concede that Biden won the 2020 Presidential Election?
 
Concart said:
The Corp of Engineers is a legitimate purpose for the military.
Click to expand...
Combat is also a legitimate purpose for the military. So is upholding the law.
Concart said:
Counting votes in a state election is not.
Click to expand...
As long as the count is progressing according to the law, it's not a problem. That count is observed according to the law, and is conducted according to the law. It doesn't matter if military hands are doing the counting or not.
Concart said:
I could not give a FUCK if you are worried someone has something to hide.
Click to expand...
YOU have something to hide...your socialist agenda.
Concart said:
The votes will be counted. Biden will win the state, and the presidency. And you will be shuffled off to the dustbin of history.
Bye Trumptard.
Click to expand...
Assumption of victory fallacy. Insult fallacy.
 
In 2016
266,208 mail-in ballots cast in PA
2,534 ballots rejected
= just under 1% (avergage is between 1 % and 3%)

Rejected mail-in ballots this year were almost 30 times lower in PA ???!!!

In 2020
2,600,000 mail-in ballots cast in PA
only 951 ballots rejected
= .03%

Drive on by. Nothing to see here while we get rid of the dead, the unsigned, the non state resident, the forged and the backdated ballots. :cool:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top