Why should I trust you would even leave?
The moderators would ensure it.
Why should I trust you would even leave?
So you say.Prove it, if you can.
Not feeding a sea-lion.
I have ZERO fake accounts, unlike a liar like you. The moderators would ensure the rules would be adhered to and implemented. Are you on? Trump will NEVER be removed from office. Permanent ban says so.
You are defending Putin, though. You're defending Putin by first denying that Russia even attacked us, but then also defending Putin by saying the attack was Obama's fault.
The cognitive dissonance is strong.
You think they did?
The moderators would ensure it.
They are alone. They just met alone behind closed doors. The only reasons would be either:
1) Trump is securing the extradition of the indicted Russians
or
2) Trump is conspiring with Putin to protect them.
There you go again, lying and making shit up. You don't seem capable of being rational at all. I am not surprised, after all, you are a liberal.
No one told me. I'm not like you; I don't let others do my thinking for me.

Because Romney thought the threat was from Russia's military, not from their FSB and troll army. Romney thought we had to spend more on a bigger military to counteract Russia, but clearly he was wrong because the threat from Russia wasn't posed by planes and tanks, but trolls and hackers.
Trump walking away with nothing less than the indicted Russians means he's a terrible negotiator, or he's working to protect them.
There's no other reason.
So you don't think Russia attacked us?
Ah, but Trump's a negotiator, isn't he? Why doesn't he negotiate for them to be extradited?
The Senate Committee says they attacked us with trolls and hackers.
Mueller's indictments show how they attacked us with trolls and hackers.
Trump's over there to...apologize for that?
Why should I believe you? You don't debate honestly here, so how will I hold you to account for this?
Do you understand what "attack" even means. Because your use of it here suggests a profound ignorance of the term. I don't even believe they were the one's who hacked the DNC or Podesta's e-mail. The founder of Wikileaks, and the beneficiary of the hacked e-mails said so. Doesn't anyone wonder why no one wants to listen to him now
How so? What's to stop you from just using a different ISP to login under a brand new name and continue doing what you're doing?
You're triggered.