GOP Is Struggling To Give 'Malaria' Tickets Away

Dunkle Thinskin and his persecution syndrome notwithstanding. How many of y'all think I want to ban the Good Dunkle Thinskin?

Don't be shy, tell me how much I want to ban him if you think I do and why you think that... I'm eager to understand your feels and why they happen.
 
True. No surprise you've chosen to overlook this part of 12C "or is used in a manner to harass other users" and you've completely ignored that @Lionfish is an incendiary troll account while you've threatened to ban me for "Posting solely for reaction, to harass, or stalk."

FWIW, I know you want to ban me and I expect you eventually will do so with "trumped" up charges as you've already threatened to do. I'm simply curious how much of your honor you'll give up to do so in public.
You are not here simply trolling and posting for reaction like so many right-wing trolls are. You, me, and the other college educated posters here have had thousands of discussions on meaningful topics.
 
You are not here simply trolling and posting for reaction like so many right-wing trolls are.

You, me, and the other college educated posters here have had thousands of discussions on meaningful topics.
Thanks, Cypress, but it appears @Damocles and his dear, dear "friend" @Lionfish the Snitch Bitch think otherwise. Be careful about pissing off those two or they'll label you an "incendiary troll account". LOL

Agreed, but that doesn't seem to matter much to the pro-MAGA mob. All they want is an echo chamber of love for their Orange God with a few token libs to kick around.
 
Dunkle Thinskin and his persecution syndrome notwithstanding. How many of y'all think I want to ban the Good Dunkle Thinskin?

Don't be shy, tell me how much I want to ban him if you think I do and why you think that... I'm eager to understand your feels and why they happen.
Oh, Damocletus. You're so funny when you are backpedaling. :)
 
Seriously though. If I want to ban someone, and was wont to do so, I could "stretch" a rule out and, like you, just "Imagine" it fits. If I were leftist enough I would justify it.

Folks have asked me to ban others for whatever line they draw and I have not. I don't even ban people I do not like. I just don't talk to them. Your problem is I like you, therefore I interact with you. I do not, however, do what you "demand"... like two way forced ignores, etc.

If I wanted to ban you, and was even very slightly less honest, you would long ago have been banned and I would have just said you were Cultsmasher or I would have "stretched" a rule like the AG in NY stretched a law to "get" Trump. You'd have been gone. Nobody has a "right" to post on my site, it is mine.
 
Seriously though. If I want to ban someone, and was wont to do so, I could "stretch" a rule out and, like you, just "Imagine" it fits. If I were leftist enough I would justify it.

Folks have asked me to ban others for whatever line they draw and I have not. I don't even ban people I do not like. I just don't talk to them. Your problem is I like you, therefore I interact with you. I do not, however, do what you "demand"... like two way forced ignores, etc.

If I wanted to ban you, and was even very slightly less honest, you would long ago have been banned and I would have just said you were Cultsmasher or I would have "stretched" a rule like the AG in NY stretched a law to "get" Trump. You'd have been gone. Nobody has a "right" to post on my site, it is mine.
A tactic you've utilized when stretching Rule #14 to apply to me yet not your dear, dear friend @Lionfish, the Snitch Bitch.

You know how much I love irony and seeing the Snitch Bitch get caught in his own web of lies and deceit is very ironic to me.

Because of your one-way Forced Ignore, I can't search his posts, but others can search "snitch" and Lionfish to see for themselves. :)

Time until I'm called on the carpet for trolling and calling someone's dear friend a "snitch bitch": 10...9....8.....
 
A tactic you've utilized when stretching Rule #14 to apply to me yet not your dear, dear friend @Lionfish, the Snitch Bitch.

You know how much I love irony and seeing the Snitch Bitch get caught in his own web of lies and deceit is very ironic to me.

Because of your one-way Forced Ignore, I can't search his posts, but others can search "snitch" and Lionfish to see for themselves. :)

Time until I'm called on the carpet for trolling and calling someone's dear friend a "snitch bitch": 10...9....8.....
I have not stretched rule 14, as I have not applied it to you in any way. You asked me "if" I had wanted to do "this" what rule would I have used... I, foolishly it seems, responded that I would have used that rule had I "wanted" to do that.

Rule 14 was not applied to you, Dunkle Thinskin.
 
I have not stretched rule 14, as I have not applied it to you in any way. You asked me "if" I had wanted to do "this" what rule would I have used... I, foolishly it seems, responded that I would have used that rule had I "wanted" to do that.

Rule 14 was not applied to you, Dunkle Thinskin.

Dunkle Thinskin? LOL....that's a lot more on the mark then me calling him Dunce Uncle, but the both of those names certainly do apply to that dunce.
 
I have not stretched rule 14, as I have not applied it to you in any way. You asked me "if" I had wanted to do "this" what rule would I have used... I, foolishly it seems, responded that I would have used that rule had I "wanted" to do that.

Rule 14 was not applied to you, Dunkle Thinskin.
You only threaten to do so, Damocletus. Passive-Aggressive?
 
You only threaten to do so, Damocletus. Passive-Aggressive?
I didn't even do that. I answered your question.

Here's how it happened:

You asked, "If you wanted to ban me what rule would you have applied?' and I said, "Rule 14 is the rule I would have used had I wanted to do that."
 
Back
Top