Gotta love those ballot dumps if you are a marxist

Teflon Don

Teflon Don

I'm back baby

Amazing how these ballot dumps after election day ALWAYS favors the marxists running as a democrat

Anyone shocked? I am not

I think it is a foregone conclusion that when Commiefornistan FINALLY finishes counting, it will be Becerra and Steyer.

I mean it is easy to cheat once you know how many you need right? No time constraints?

I mean it would be racist to expect people to vote in a specified time frame

Commiefornistan has become a national joke on many fronts. Third world countries have better voting processes than Commiefornistan
 
Teflon Don said:

Amazing how these ballot dumps after election day ALWAYS favors the marxists running as a democrat

Anyone shocked? I am not

I think it is a foregone conclusion that when Commiefornistan FINALLY finishes counting, it will be Becerra and Steyer.

I mean it is easy to cheat once you know how many you need right? No time constraints?

I mean it would be racist to expect people to vote in a specified time frame

Commiefornistan has become a national joke on many fronts. Third world countries have better voting processes than Commiefornistan
Click to expand...
Keep dumping ballots till the Commiecrats win! Stalin would be proud.
 
Teflon Don said:

Amazing how these ballot dumps after election day ALWAYS favors the marxists running as a democrat

Anyone shocked? I am not

I think it is a foregone conclusion that when Commiefornistan FINALLY finishes counting, it will be Becerra and Steyer.

I mean it is easy to cheat once you know how many you need right? No time constraints?

I mean it would be racist to expect people to vote in a specified time frame

Commiefornistan has become a national joke on many fronts. Third world countries have better voting processes than Commiefornistan
Click to expand...
It’s called democray idiot

Why do you want ballots to not be counted?

Because when your shitheads run they lose is why
 
evince said:
It’s called democray idiot

Why do you want ballots to not be counted?

Because when your shitheads run they lose is why
Click to expand...
Up to election day, and on election day, in California the voting runs something like 55% Democrat, 45% Republican, at most. Then the counting starts and 'late' ballots arrive in the tens, even hundreds, of thousands. With these, the voting is more like 85 to 90% Democrat and 10 to 15% Republican. I guess, even for the Democrats, having it be 99 to 100% Democrat votes would be too obvious.
 
Teflon Don said:
Amazing how these ballot dumps after election day ALWAYS favors the marxists running as a democrat!
Click to expand...
Brand new to politics, eh?

It's always going to take longer to compile and count ballots from big urban counties like Los Angeles, Alemeda, San Francisco because there are millions of voters.

The rural, sparsely populated, and conservative-leaning counties always finish their counting first because they don't have as big of a job to accomplish.

That's exactly why you often see a Republican candidate leap out to an early lead, while the Democrat frequently closes the gap as urban county totals come in later.
 
Cypress said:
Brand new to politics, eh?

It's always going to take longer to compile and count ballots from big urban counties like Los Angeles, Alemeda, San Francisco because there are millions of voters.

The rural, sparsely populated, and conservative-leaning counties always finish their counting first because they don't have as big of a job to accomplish.

That's exactly why you often see a Republican candidate leap out to an early lead, while the Democrat frequently closes the gap as urban county totals come in later.
Click to expand...
Then explain this Mr. Peabody...

In post-election ballots counted in California, it is common for 80% + of them to be Democrat votes. The highest percentage of registered Democrats in California by county is about 55%, and most are closer to 45%. So, how the fuck are 80% + of the votes coming in after election day Democrat?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Then explain this Mr. Peabody...

In post-election ballots counted in California, it is common for 80% + of them to be Democrat votes. The highest percentage of registered Democrats in California by county is about 55%, and most are closer to 45%. So, how the fuck are 80% + of the votes coming in after election day Democrat?
Click to expand...
Give me a highly reputable, nonpartisan link proving this litany of claims

Mail in voting always favors Democrats, and
late vote counts are almost always from core urban areas, for the reason I describe.

If you are frustrated that more Republicans aren't voting by mail, look no further than your bloated Messiah.
 
FastLane said:
Keep dumping ballots till the Commiecrats win! Stalin would be proud.
Click to expand...
This is just a primary. It doesn't ultimately matter if Republican Hilton finishes first place or second. He is guaranteed one or the other, and those top two places both advance and face off in the general election.

Explain exactly why Democrats would commit massive felony vote fraud just to put Bacerra in first place when it doesn't really matter if he is first or second place. Either way Baccera and Hilton are both advancing to the general election.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Then explain this Mr. Peabody...

In post-election ballots counted in California, it is common for 80% + of them to be Democrat votes. The highest percentage of registered Democrats in California by county is about 55%, and most are closer to 45%. So, how the fuck are 80% + of the votes coming in after election day Democrat?
Click to expand...


According to ChatGPT,
  • Late-counted mail-in ballots in California do tend to favor Democrats, but they generally mirror or slightly exceed the overall partisan breakdown of that specific county. They do not magically jump to 80% statewide.
  • County-Level Reality: In a county with 45% or 55% registered Democrats, the late ballots typically break around those same percentages, sometimes shifting a few points more Democrat.
  • Where 80% Happens: The only places where late ballots hit 80% or higher for Democrats are counties like San Francisco or Alameda (Oakland), where the baseline registration for Democrats is already extraordinarily high (often 60% to 70%+).
 
Cypress said:
This is just a primary. It doesn't ultimately matter if Republican Hilton finishes first place or second. He is guaranteed one or the other, and those top two places both advance and face off in the general election.

Explain exactly why Democrats would commit massive felony vote fraud just to put Bacerra in first place when it doesn't really matter if he is first or second place. Either way Baccera and Hilton are both advancing to the general election.
Click to expand...

Are you ignorant enough to be unaware of how crossover voting works, or were you hoping others are?

For voter-nominated offices—which include the Governor, state legislators, and U.S. Senators and Representatives—California uses a "Top-Two Candidates Open Primary"

How it works: All candidates, regardless of their party preference, are listed on a single ballot. Every registered voter receives this exact same ballot, no matter which party the voter belongs to.
  • Because everyone shares one ballot, strategic voting is common. Opponents can intentionally rally behind a weaker candidate from the opposing party to push them into the top two slots, successfully knocking a stronger opponent out before the general election.
 
Teflon Don said:

Amazing how these ballot dumps after election day ALWAYS favors the marxists running as a democrat

Anyone shocked? I am not

I think it is a foregone conclusion that when Commiefornistan FINALLY finishes counting, it will be Becerra and Steyer.

I mean it is easy to cheat once you know how many you need right? No time constraints?

I mean it would be racist to expect people to vote in a specified time frame

Commiefornistan has become a national joke on many fronts. Third world countries have better voting processes than Commiefornistan
Click to expand...

North Korea called Gavin Newsom to say how envious they are of how corrupt California elections are.
 
Teflon Don said:
www.foxnews.com

Spencer Pratt loses ground to Democrat while Hilton maintains lead in latest California ballot batch drop

Spencer Pratt's lead over Nithya Raman narrowed in the L.A. mayoral primary after the latest mail-in ballot count yielded minimal votes for him.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com

Watching an election being stolen out in the open. The marxists don’t even hide it
Click to expand...

California elections have much in common with the elections under Stalin in the old USSR.

The outcome is decided long before the first ballot is cast. The party backfills ballots until the correct "winner" is validated. Free and fair elections don't exist in this state,
 
Cypress said:
This is just a primary. It doesn't ultimately matter if Republican Hilton finishes first place or second. He is guaranteed one or the other, and those top two places both advance and face off in the general election.

Explain exactly why Democrats would commit massive felony vote fraud just to put Bacerra in first place when it doesn't really matter if he is first or second place. Either way Baccera and Hilton are both advancing to the general election.
Click to expand...

California has rigged elections. The goal of the party is to block any and all non-party candidates from running. We typically have ONLY party members on the general ballot.

We can elect the Communist of our choice, but ONLY Communists are on the general ballot. Elections in California are not legitimate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top