You still cannot learn. If you dump a bunch of ballots, they cannot be counted. They have to be assigned to a precinct. If you put some random precinct on the ballot, it cannot be counted. The person who you pretend has a vote, will not be in the precinct log book. If the precinct gets 50 votes with the same name, a cop is called. Why are you rightys so susceptible to lies, even dumb ones like that?
Gotta love those ballot dumps if you are a marxist
- Thread starter Teflon Don
- Start date
"ballot dumps"?
A "ballot dump" is an informal phrase used to describe a large, sudden release or counting of ballots at once during an election — especially batches of mail-in or absentee ballots reported late in the vote count. It is a large group of ballots (e.g., mail ballots received together) being processed or reported in a single update, which can cause a noticeable jump in one candidate’s totals.
Who told you that?
Dumping ballots" refers to a sudden, large release of legitimately cast mail-in or absentee votes into the public counting system. Legally, these votes must be and are counted.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Spencer Pratt loses ground to Democrat while Hilton maintains lead in latest California ballot batch drop
Spencer Pratt's lead over Nithya Raman narrowed in the L.A. mayoral primary after the latest mail-in ballot count yielded minimal votes for him.
www.foxnews.com
Explain how nearly 100,000 votes are counted in a "ballot dump" and the Republican candidate gets ZERO of them. Democrats make up about 45% of the electorate, and the highest county in the state is only about 55% Democrat (Alameda County).
You know the voting percentages up to and on election day. How come it suddenly shifts from about what those voter registration percentages are on election day to 80% + Democrat after election day as counting continues? There is NO, NONE, NOT A SINGLE, rational reason for that to happen. California IS NOT 80% Democrat voters.
All you've described is what happens, not why. That you cannot explain because there is no logical, rational, sane reason for it to happen outside of one party cheating. This isn't new, and it isn't about this election alone. I've said this is true for years now. I'm saying it again. The Democrats in California are using election fraud built into the system to rig elections there.
Voter registration by party:
CA Voter Data: Registration by Party, Turnout & Primary Rules
California voter registration data: registered Democrats vs Republicans, independent voter count, primary election type, and voter turnout statistics. Updated 2026.
independentvoterproject.org
FOX??
This is just a primary. The top two vote-getters advance to the general election. It doesn't ultimately matter if Republican Hilton finishes first place or second. One way or the other he and Bacerra are both guaranteed to advance and face off in the general election.
Explain exactly why Democrats would commit massive felony vote fraud just to put Bacerra in first place when it doesn't really matter if he is first or second place. Either way Baccera and Hilton are both advancing to the general election.
Are you denying the common usage of crossover "strategic" voting in primaries to make sure the other party's weaker candidate goes to the general election?
For voter-nominated offices—which include the Governor, state legislators, and U.S. Senators and Representatives—California uses a "Top-Two Candidates Open Primary"
How it works: All candidates, regardless of their party preference, are listed on a single ballot. Every registered voter receives this exact same ballot, no matter which party the voter belongs to.
- Because everyone shares one ballot, strategic voting is common. Opponents can intentionally rally behind a weaker candidate from the opposing party to push them into the top two slots, successfully knocking a stronger opponent out before the general election.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
FOX??
Ad hominem.
If the outcome is changed from what it is right now to where the Republican candidates are in third place, the governor's and LA mayor's race becomes a vote between a Leftist and a radical Leftist, both nominally Democrats. That's how California's top two system works. My bet is in the next couple of weeks the race narrows as Pratt and Hilton lose ground rapidly with something close to 80% of the votes (an impossibly high percentage) counted after election day going to one or another nominally Democrat candidate. Both are under 10% ahead of the third-place challenger meaning both could possibly lose their lead and be removed from the race.
Because retaining power is more important that holding free, open, and fair elections. That is a universal with the Left, and the Left are, today, Democrats. It does matter if Steyer edges out Hilton, even by a very slim margin. And that margin is possible. In fact, I'd say the Democrats are counting on it happening.
I'm betting that five minutes before you read my post you did not understand the top two vote-getters regardless of party advance to the general election, and now you are trying to bullshit your way through this.
The Republican Steve Hilton is guaranteed to advance to the general election against Bacerra; it makes absolutely no difference if his vote total is #1 or #2. He is definitely going to be one of the top two vote-getters, and will advance to the general election.
So you are asking me to believe the Democrats are committing massive vote fraud felony just to boost Bacerra from #1 to #2 even though that wouldn't make the slightest difference to the general election.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
and no illegal has ever voted because that would be illegal and not allowed.
you're dumber than underwear.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
I understood it, and I disagree with it vehemently. All a party that wants to keep power has to do is make sure two of its candidates make to the actual election. That cuts out alternatives. This is a classic move used in "Socialist Democracies" to ensure that socialism survives intact no matter what.I'm betting that five minutes before you read my post you did not understand the top two vote-getters regardless of party advance to the general election, and now you are trying to bullshit your way through this.
The Republican Steve Hilton is guaranteed to advance to the general election against Bacerra; it makes absolutely no difference if his vote total is #1 or #2. He is definitely going to be one of the top two vote-getters, and will advance to the general election.
So you are asking me to believe the Democrats are committing massive vote fraud felony just to boost Bacerra from #1 to #2 even though that wouldn't make the slightest difference to the general election.
If Steyer gets enough votes in the counting that will go on for weeks, Hilton may well find himself out of the race. His lead is insufficient, based on past elections, to ensure he isn't out voted in the post-election results. Bacerra isn't the issue. He'll go to the general election in November regardless. It's Hilton vs. Steyer that matters, and Steyer has a good chance that with 80% of the vote going Democrat post-election day, that he'll overtake Hilton and Californians get the choice of a Leftist Democrat or radical Leftist Democrat for governor.
That's not how these kids are using the term. They are making it out to be some nefarious plot.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
24K ballots, no Republican votes.
Rumor has it there was a trap set in place to catch election cheating, but I don't believe it.
Although there is a Federal U.S. Attorney there checking it out.
So you say.
Nope. So they did. Read the thread.
You made the claim.
I ain't spoon feeding your dumb ass. There are only 37 posts here.
Read them or fuck off. Either way is fine with me.
I guess you can't prove your own claims, then.
Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
two republicans going on to the final round would be worse for them right?I'm betting that five minutes before you read my post you did not understand the top two vote-getters regardless of party advance to the general election, and now you are trying to bullshit your way through this.
The Republican Steve Hilton is guaranteed to advance to the general election against Bacerra; it makes absolutely no difference if his vote total is #1 or #2. He is definitely going to be one of the top two vote-getters, and will advance to the general election.
So you are asking me to believe the Democrats are committing massive vote fraud felony just to boost Bacerra from #1 to #2 even though that wouldn't make the slightest difference to the general election.
ya dumb fuck.