Heads up Teabillies - the gubmint's a comin for your small dick compensators

You are a complete moron. Murder is society's business.

Abortion isn't murder, and you don't know anything about the circumstances surrounding whatever it is you think Northram was talking about.

Let's remember; your judgment is so fucking bad that you got conned by a reality TV show host.
 
I own two guns..........and would gladly surrender them the moment they were outlawed
I don't believe you. Your knowledge of guns is minimal. Your knowledge of the 2nd amendment is even less.
on the other hand you'd put on those Kmart cammies and go hide in the woods with your butt buddies
No need to hide in the woods. They are ALL AROUND YOU right now! You are SURROUNDED by people with guns just walking down the street!
 
How did they do that they would be destroyed by the mens team!

What men's team?

The one that hasn't won a World Cup, ever?

The one that brings in less revenue than the women's?

The one that gets lower TV ratings than the women's?

That team?
 
maybe because i'm over the age of 50, but lets not allow facts and information to color your idiocy

That's right, you're an old fuck who hasn't had training since the 80's, whose service was sitting in an air-conditioned room, directing traffic.

Yeah...low bar standards there.

Did you join the terrorist group to fulfill that which you didn't get in the Marines? After all, it's hard to posture as a tough guy when all you did to serve the country and defend freedums is sit on your ass all day and stare at a screen.
 
US Constitution, Art 1, Sec 10, clause 3...........

No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace,

now some of you idiot government suckers explain how you think that the 2nd Amendment allows the state to regulate militias when they are not allowed to keep their own troops?????

You have changed Article 1, Sec 10, clause 3 by omission.

Article 1 said:
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

This is what the militia is for. To defend a State from invasion or imminent danger. Militias are NOT a standing army. They are called into service to defend their State. It is the State's right to defend itself. It uses the militia to do that.
 
That's right, you're an old fuck who hasn't had training since the 80's, whose service was sitting in an air-conditioned room, directing traffic.

Yeah...low bar standards there.

Did you join the terrorist group to fulfill that which you didn't get in the Marines? After all, it's hard to posture as a tough guy when all you did to serve the country and defend freedums is sit on your ass all day and stare at a screen.

you're ridiculous................but then most narcissists with projection issues usually are.
 
is there a law against my keeping my marksmanship finely tuned just because i'm no longer active duty??????

No. But pretending that your standards are high because of training you got 30 years ago, that you didn't even exercise in a combat situation, is bullshit.
 
You have changed Article 1, Sec 10, clause 3 by omission.

This is what the militia is for. To defend a State from invasion or imminent danger. Militias are NOT a standing army. They are called into service to defend their State. It is the State's right to defend itself. It uses the militia to do that.

you're either just missing the point, or are being obtuse about it. my statement is very clear to those who think the militia should be the government regulated entity and how that can clearly not be the case when the constitution prohibits states from keeping their own troops
 
No. But pretending that your standards are high because of training you got 30 years ago, that you didn't even exercise in a combat situation, is bullshit.

pretending that ONLY combat troops are the only ones capable of having those 'standards' is ludicrous and the position of a moron...........but you've made that evident enough
 
I never said it was the state, you keep assuming all of that.

Well, there needs to be a body of some kind that regulates it, since the Second Amendment literally says they are "Well-regulated".

To what regulations has your terrorist group adhered?


NO government body regulates them

The 2A literally starts with "A well-regulated militia".

So...someone has to determine if they're regulated. Who is that if it's not the State?


that is not what is meant by 'well regulated'

If they intended self-regulation, they would have said so.


unless, of course, you can show me any piece of documentation that this is what the founders intended

You don't have any proof that the founders intended self-regulation of your terrorist group. "Well-regulated" means, what? What do you think "well regulated" means? You seem to think it means no regulation or self-regulation, but that's not spelled out anywhere in the document.
 
Back
Top