Are you saying every person claiming asylum is doing so legitimately?
He's so far off base it doesn't matter. I just wilted his candle.
Are you saying every person claiming asylum is doing so legitimately?
You think that proves your claim, Mature Masturbator?
In case you suffer from libnesia, here's what you alleged:
In fact, here's what the article that Y O U cited says:
"With the "zero-tolerance" policy in place, high-ranking U.S. government officials, including Sessions, have said that migrants presenting their asylum claims at ports of entry would not be prosecuted."
https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/immigration/2018/06/18/sessions-asylum-seekers-go-border-ports-but-its-not-easy/710796002/
BTW, Mature Masturbator, that article that Y O U cited is dated June 18. Since then, our president has issued an Executive Order ending the separation of minors from their alleged parents, and a federal judge has ordered that all detainees be released after no more than 20 days, per the Flores settlement.
1. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/20/white-house-considering-executive-action-to-prevent-family-separations-at-border.html
2. https://www.wsj.com/articles/judge-refuses-trump-request-to-change-court-order-on-family-detention-1531188606
Lest you be inclined to crow, the same judge slapped down Obama when he applied for an exception to the Flores settlement.
3. https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article28687876.html
Get a grip on yourself, old man.
Are you saying every person claiming asylum is doing so legitimately?
Again, they enslaved and sold off rivals. I understand in the case of the US it was white people who were the final buyers. But she said white people enslaved them, which is inaccurate in many cases. Most were enslaved by other rival tribes. White people kept them in slavery. So there is plenty of blame to go around.
I already knew what had occurred since the article was written.
![]()
Under Trumps "zero tolerance" law they are being arrested at the Ports of Entry, and their children taken away from them.
![]()
Where is your proof that some of the kids DNA did not match that of their "parents"?
![]()
![]()
DARTH IS NOT YOUR FATHER, LUKE
The U.S. government's DNA testing of migrant families separated at the Southwest border has turned up some surprises.
A Health and Human Services official said Tuesday that adults who thought they were parents of a child were determined not to be by DNA testing.
It was unclear how the "surprises" would be dealt with.
The government is using DNA testing along with documentation such as birth certificates to reunite children with their real parents.
https://foxsanantonio.com/news/nation-world/governments-dna-testing-turns-up-surprises-in-family-reunification-process
Like Obama before him, Trump found out that the Flores agreement is binding.
The Trump administration is being forced to release migrant families into the United States equipped with ankle monitors after court orders restricted the government's ability to hold thousands of migrant families detained at the southern U.S. border.
On Monday, a federal judge refused to amend a previous court order mandating the maximum time a child can be detained under federal law, which the Trump administration argued was necessary due to backlogs in the court system.
“Defendants seek to light a match to the Flores agreement and ask this court to upend the parties’ agreement by judicial fiat,” Judge Dolly M. Gee of the Federal District Court in Los Angeles wrote.
https://archive.fo/3vToQ#selection-1715.0-1719.197
That's right. So why did Obama detain asylees, old man?
Not at all, but far more then you want to accept.
![]()
How long are you fools going to use Obama as your whipping boy for the asinine actions of your lawd and master?
![]()
![]()
THEY SOUGHT ASYLUM - OBAMA CAGED THEM - THIS IS THEIR STORY
The immigration debate intensified a couple of years ago during the Obama Administration when a flood of women and children came across the U.S.-Mexico border.
Obama didn't know how to handle the influx, so he detained these women and children in three family centers: two in Texas; one in Pennsylvania. There were more than a thousand people in these centers, waiting to know if they'd be allowed to stay in the country.
Maria Rosa Lopez and her son were some of thousands of people who fled from Central America to the U.S. in 2014 to escape domestic abuse — which is considered a credible fear that can warrant an asylum claim.
From Guatemala City, she and her son crossed another border into Mexico and then took a bus north to Monterrey, close to the northern Mexico-U.S. border. "I paid someone to take us across on a boat. It was night time and we slept in the desert on the U.S. side. There were other moms and their kids there too. A Brazilian woman asked me if she could sleep next to us," Lopez says.
The next morning, immigration officers woke them and took them to the Karnes detention center outside of San Antonio, Texas.
Lopez wanted asylum so she and her son could start their lives over in the U.S. She didn't know what to expect when she got on American soil, but she didn't expect to be housed in this facility with no word on when she'd be released.
"I was desperate when we got there. It was hard to see my child crying and he was asking a lot of questions," she recalls. "He knew it was a detention center and he wanted to know how long we were going to be there."
But she didn't know either. "No one was answering questions. I talked with people who had been there for six, eight months, and it was very depressing." she says. "Often my son couldn't fall asleep, we had bunk beds. He was on top of me but he would crawl down and wanted to be with me."
Denise Gilman, one of Maria's former lawyers, says the Karnes detention facility "feels very much like a prison" with "cinderblock walls, clanging doors, X-ray machines all over the place, buzzers that you have to use to get in and out to go see your 9-year-old client and his mom."
Gilman, director of the immigration clinic at the University of Texas Law School, says these women and children are seeking asylum, but they're treated like criminals.
https://www.npr.org/2016/03/20/471148251/when-asylum-seeking-women-and-children-immigrants-are-welcomed-like-criminalsillegal-immigrant-parents-can-be-detained-children/
Problem with dickheads like you is that you are always whining about caring for the poor, and yet you are so eager to give more to your wealthy masters. Christ spoke of your kind of hypocrisy as did Jefferson, Madison, Franklin, etc. And yet, like most everything else, you lack the ability to understand. You are so tied to your masters ass (or is it the dick end) that you lack the capacity to understand even the simplest of truths. Last year we gave over 12,000 dollars to the homeless. What did your god, and master, give? What did you give?
Matthew 25: 34-40
“Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, ‘Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was an hungered, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.’
Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, ‘Lord, when saw we thee an hungered, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink? When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee? Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?’
And the King shall answer and say unto them, ‘Verily I say unto you, inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.’ “
“Let us suppose that the great empire of China, with all its myriads of inhabitants, was suddenly swallowed up by an earthquake, and let us consider how a man of humanity in Europe, who had no sort of connection with that part of the world, would be affected upon receiving intelligence of this dreadful calamity. He would, I imagine, first of all, express very strongly his sorrow for the misfortune of that unhappy people, he would make many melancholy reflections upon the precariousness of human life, and the vanity of all the labours of man, which could thus be annihilated in a moment. He would too, perhaps, if he was a man of speculation, enter into many reasonings concerning the effects which this disaster might produce upon the commerce of Europe, and the trade and business of the world in general. And when all this fine philosophy was over, when all these humane sentiments had been once fairly expressed, he would pursue his business or his pleasure, take his repose or his diversion, with the same ease and tranquillity, as if no such accident had happened. The most frivolous disaster which could befall himself would occasion a more real disturbance. If he was to lose his little finger to-morrow, he would not sleep to-night; but, provided he never saw them, he will snore with the most profound security over the ruin of a hundred millions of his brethren, and the destruction of that immense multitude seems plainly an object less interesting to him, than this paltry misfortune of his own. To prevent, therefore, this paltry misfortune to himself, would a man of humanity be willing to sacrifice the lives of a hundred millions of his brethren, provided he had never seen them? Human nature startles with horror at the thought, and the world, in its greatest depravity and corruption, never produced such a villain as could be capable of entertaining it. But what makes this difference? When our passive feelings are almost always so sordid and so selfish, how comes it that our active principles should often be so generous and so noble? When we are always so much more deeply affected by whatever concerns ourselves, than by whatever concerns other men; what is it which prompts the generous, upon all occasions, and the mean upon many, to sacrifice their own interests to the greater interests of others? It is not the soft power of humanity, it is not that feeble spark of benevolence which Nature has lighted up in the human heart, that is thus capable of counteracting the strongest impulses of self-love. It is a stronger power, a more forcible motive, which exerts itself upon such occasions. It is reason, principle, conscience, the inhabitant of the breast, the man within, the great judge and arbiter of our conduct.”
― Adam Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments
As the man says THINK
How long are you fools going to use Obama as your whipping boy for the asinine actions of your lawd and master?
http://www.politifact.com/punditfac...ald-trumps-separation-immigrant-families-was/
So you say, Mature Masturbator.
So you say. Yet you apparently tried to pass it off as proof of your claim, which is in the present tense, old man.
Right here, Mature Masturbator:
And, furthermore, old man:
You didn't know about that, did you, Mature Masturbator?
Get a grip on yourself, old man.
Perhaps you should ask the Obama supporters how long they're going to continue to attack G.W. Bush. They're still bringing up Ronald Reagan.
Not at all, but far more then you want to accept.
More excuses from the peanut gallery.
"A Health and Human Services official said Tuesday that adults who thought they were parents of a child were determined not to be by DNA testing."
![]()
Do you have the survey and official records on file with the government to where those boundaries are.
You're the one that seems to be going nuts claiming things you have no ability to prove expecting others to believe it because you said it.
Good point. They seem to think there's a rule against talking about past DEMOCRAT presidents, though, don't they?
If liberals didn't have double standards, would they have nay standards at all?
I wanted to get back to this piece of trash argument, and then I have to go start a barbecue.
You ask for records. When the Pilgrims first arrived, and the Puritans, etc., they made agreements with the Native Americans regarding use of the land. It is well documented if you wish to study the topic.
Later, when the American government was established, treaties were signed considering use of land (none of which the invaders honored). Then the genocide by the White invaders began. Before that was the enslavement of thousands of Native Americans prior to the buying/selling of Black slaves who were better workers. This is also well documented.
So, from the first invasion of America by the Europeans we have a documented record of the ownership of the land by the Native Americans as well as the European fraud concerning the land, the genocide perpetrated by the invaders, and a history of compensation for the theft of the land by the government, the deaths of many of the original inhabitants, the borders of the land, etc.
And thus the shining ignorance you possess is now complete.
The rule I apply is if you're going to do it and tell me it's OK, don't tell me it's not when I do the same thing.