'Hell, yes, we're going to take your AR-15, your AK-47' - Beto "Whitey" O'rourke

[domer76]

A little embarrassed to link your rebuttal to the Daily Beast? The first thing you could google? What a fucking idiot.

Those are quotes DIRECTLY from the Heller decision, idiot.

Try to get some education, cuntwhistle

 

[domer76]

When are you going to protest in public fat boy?

Why would I bitch? You gonna protect me with your pissant popgun?

 

[domer76]

Thanks for proving me right
That doesn't say.... Regulate the shit out of....

You fucked up, again. Ignorant drunkard.

I tried to bold the pertinent areas about the ability to regulate and even cited the most extreme regulation- banning. But you’re too fucking stupid to grasp it.

 

[OG Yurt]

I tried to bold the pertinent areas about the ability to regulate and even cited the most extreme regulation- banning. But you’re too fucking stupid to grasp it.

The court specifically held the regulation was NOT UNLIMITED you ignorant tool. That was the whole point of the case, was how far can a government entity regulate gins in light of the second amendment as it applies to individuals.

You are seriously the dumbest person I've come across.

 

[domer76]

The court specifically held the regulation was NOT UNLIMITED you ignorant tool. That was the whole point of the case, was how far can a government entity regulate gins in light of the second amendment as it applies to individuals.

You are seriously the dumbest person I've come across.

Banning is as extreme as it gets, stoner. And it’s constitutional.

God, what a fucking stupid person.

 

[OG Yurt]

Banning is as extreme as it gets, stoner. And it’s constitutional.

God, what a fucking stupid person.

That is absolutely not what SCOTUS said you lying scumbag

Do you really want to go there with me?

Let's make it a one on one debate in any forum you choose. Just you and I.

Any mod can make it so. I'm sick of running around the board for this debate, agree to make it a one on one and have a mod make it a debate thread. I am pretty sure there is a section for that or they will make one.

Unless you're a chicken.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

“When the government comes after us” lol

There has got to be medication for RW paranoia.

there is.......it comes in multiple calibers.......

 

[Bigdog]

“When the government comes after us” lol

Like when Philadelphia bombed the MOVE compound? Google it, domehead

 

[domer76]

Like when Philadelphia bombed the MOVE compound? Google it, domehead

The government came “to get you”?

The radical group was building its own explosives

 

[nolongertolerant]

Why would I bitch? You gonna protect me with your pissant popgun?

It is true then. You are 5'3" and weigh 300 lbs porky. A fat gay gender confused liberal. What a surprise.

 

[Bigdog]

The government came “to get you”?

The radical group was building its own explosives

You just hated them and wanted to kill them because they were Black, Democrater

 

[Into the Night]

"The impetus for the National Firearms Act of 1934 was the gangland crime of the Prohibition era, such as the St. Valentine's Day Massacre of 1929, and the attempted assassination of President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933.[3][4]:824[5][6] Like the current National Firearms Act (NFA), the 1934 Act required NFA firearms to be registered and taxed. The $200 tax was quite prohibitive at the time (equivalent to $3,746 in 2018). With a few exceptions, the tax amount is unchanged.[5][6]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Firearms_Act

Unconstitutional.

 

[Into the Night]

They interpret the Constitution, and they did determine that gun rights can be regulated, simple fact

WRONG. Changing the Constitution is not interpreting it. It is CHANGING it. The Supreme Court does not have authority to change the Constitution. Neither to they have the authority to interpret it. See Article III of the Constitution of the United States.

 

[Into the Night]

It depends on how any legislation is written. For instance, if there’s a grandfather clause, that’s one thing.

If not, any possession of those weapons makes you in violation of the law

WRONG. The law in question is the Constitution of the United States.

 

[Into the Night]

Again, you dishonest morons truncate his quote.

Inversion fallacy. That is YOU doing that.

 

[Into the Night]

It also says we can regulate the shit out of them, dumbfuck.

The Supreme Court does not have authority to change the Constitution of the United States.

 

[Into the Night]

Look up Heller, you ignorant pussy fart.

In the majority opinion, Scalia says just that.

Scalia does not have authority to change the Constitution of the United States.

 

[Into the Night]

Do two things, you massively ignorant stoner.

First, try to educate yourself on Heller.

Second, read his ENTIRE quote.

If you understand English and pay attention to what he has added to the debate, you might figure it out.

But you won’t because you’re so incredibly lazy and stupid

The Supreme Court does NOT have authority to change the Constitution.

 

[Into the Night]

Then you go to prison for illegal possession of a firearm, you stupid fuck.

It is not illegal to possess an AR-15 style rifle.

 

[Into the Night]

Yes. But if the Government is going to use Battle Tanks and Helicopter Gunships, we need more firepower than AR-15s.

Works for me! However, don't underestimate the role small arms play in any warfare.