If ti wasn't illegal, I'd use my K-bar to carve a fucking swastika on your forehead.
Define 'assault weapon'.
You're a liar, Gonzo.Make no mistake.No it is not. Do you think gun rights and weapons have gotten weaker? Do you really? Rightys are capable of such self-delusion.
Why does this remind me of the seven pointed star carved into the foreheads of the religious fanatics in Game of Thrones?
Yes. They started the fire to avoid capture by government agents. Agents who were obviously there to shoot them and bulldoze their home. Agents violating the Constitution of the United States.
They shot his wife and son, who no threat. All by government agents violating the Constitution of the United States.
McVeigh's attack was retaliatory in nature. It was an act of revenge.
Inversion fallacy. That is what YOU are doing. It is the liberals that try to use buzzwords like 'assault weapons' (there is no such thing), or try to limit large magazines (an argument from randU. You can't even define 'large').It is pretty funny, I don't know how many times I've seen gun huggers attempt to deflect in these gun exchanges by trying to turn it into an arguement on gun semantics, that the other is wrong close they don't know the difference weapons.
For most guns. That is exactly right. You should think about that before you try to forcibly take them away from someone.Bottom line, thier purpose by design is to kill a lot of people in a matter of seconds regardless of what you call them
key point there being there "earl" "within the home," and Holder, and other cases attempting to use Holder as a precedent, went far beyond that, meaning guns can be regulated. Need proof, DC today is not an open gun city even though Holder centered upon DC gun laws
Please convey that to Bigdog. He seems lost.

The Second Amendment and Heller v. D.C. protect the right for the non-militia to bear arms.
Where the bullet 'tumbles' and shreds the person.
Oh pleez, stop projecting, Stalinist Moron.![]()
So a shotgun is an assault weapon.
So a BB gun is an assault weapon.
I think you are confused. You are only showing you know nothing about guns or even ballistics in general.
Yes. They started the fire to avoid capture by government agents. Agents who were obviously there to shoot them and bulldoze their home. Agents violating the Constitution of the United States.
They shot his wife and son, who no threat. All by government agents violating the Constitution of the United States.
McVeigh's attack was retaliatory in nature. It was an act of revenge.
I stole it from Inglorious Bastards.
Never really watched Game of Thrones.
Just trying to help in your education. You seem to be at a complete loss as to what is going on around you. You seem completely oblivious of how important Waco was, and the resulting backlash that produced Timothy McVeigh.
Please convey that to Bigdog. He seems lost.
Just trying to help in your education. You seem to be at a complete loss as to what is going on around you. You seem completely oblivious of how important Waco was, and the resulting backlash that produced Timothy McVeigh.
If a lot of people come to my house and threaten my family and me, yes, they will face a gun with many rounds.
TheSecond cond and Heller v. D.C. protects this tight.