How do board leftists feel about the socialists taking over the party?

Diogenes said:
There are several countries that are widely described as democratic socialist (or having strong democratic socialist influences/governments), though the exact label is debated depending on definitions.


Key Distinctions​


  • Democratic socialism generally means achieving socialist goals (e.g., strong public ownership in key sectors, extensive welfare, reducing inequality) through democratic elections and reforms, rather than revolution or authoritarianism. It often overlaps with social democracy (a mixed capitalist economy with a robust welfare state), and critics argue the latter isn't "true" socialism because private enterprise and markets remain dominant.
  • Pure socialism (state ownership of the means of production) is rare in functioning democracies today. Most examples are hybrid systems.

Common Examples​


Many sources list these countries as democratic socialist or social democratic with socialist-leaning policies:


  • Nordic countries (Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Iceland): Frequently cited for universal healthcare, free/affordable education, strong unions, high taxes, and generous welfare. Social democratic parties have long dominated. Bernie Sanders and others point to them as models. They rank very high in economic freedom and prosperity indices despite (or alongside) these policies.
  • Others often mentioned: Germany, UK (under Labour governments), France, Spain, Netherlands, Canada, New Zealand, Austria, Belgium, Portugal.
  • Additional cases: Some list Brazil, Bangladesh, South Africa, Poland (historically or variably), Nepal, and Sri Lanka with socialist parties in power.

Historical examples include Salvador Allende's Chile (1970–1973) and various post-WWII European governments with nationalizations.


Important Caveats​


  • Not "full socialism": Even in these countries, the economy is predominantly capitalist with private ownership, markets, and businesses driving growth. Nordic nations have deregulated, privatized some services, and score high on economic freedom (often higher than the US in some metrics). Leaders in Denmark and elsewhere have pushed back against being called "socialist."
  • Terminology debate: Some strict definitions say no major country today is truly democratic socialist because they haven't replaced capitalism wholesale. Others see social democracies as the practical, successful implementation.
  • Governments change: Socialist or social democratic parties win and lose power regularly.

The claim likely stems from a narrow definition excluding mixed economies or social democracies. In reality, many stable, prosperous democracies incorporate democratic socialist ideas and parties. No country matches a pure ideological version perfectly, but plenty exist with those characteristics.
Click to expand...
All of that is correct. None of the identity as a purely democratic socialist country though.
 
cawacko said:
That's fine. But look at the DSA platform and what they say they stand for vis a vis Israel-Palestine and look at the DSAs running for, and winning, office. They aren't offering nuanced positions. They tend to be very strongly pro-Palestine and very critical of Israel. Much more so than most Democrats.
Click to expand...
Candidates rarely hold to the platform of their party 100%.

I judge each individually.
 
Sailor said:
That is the definition of Democratic Socialism. Feel free to look it up. They are not hiding what they want to do. They are relying on democrats not to be smart enough to look it up. And they are winning.
Click to expand...
He’s only asking for the source, you afraid to cite the source
 
Sailor said:
That is the definition of Democratic Socialism. Feel free to look it up. They are not hiding what they want to do. They are relying on democrats not to be smart enough to look it up. And they are winning.
Click to expand...
Citation? Every Republican who supports Medicare is supporting Socialism.


define democratic socialism:

Democratic socialism is a political and economic philosophy that seeks to achieve a more equal society through democratic means—elections, legislation, and constitutional government—rather than through revolution.

The core idea is that while markets can exist, certain sectors of the economy and key services should be owned, regulated, or guaranteed for the public good.

Common principles of democratic socialism​

  • Universal healthcare
  • Strong labor unions and worker protections
  • Higher taxes on the wealthy to fund social programs
  • Affordable or free higher education
  • Robust social safety nets
  • Greater regulation of large corporations
  • In some versions, worker ownership or public ownership of certain industries

What it is not​

  • It is not the same as communism, which traditionally advocates collective ownership of nearly all means of production and, historically, has often been associated with one-party states.
  • It is not necessarily the same as social democracy, although the two overlap significantly.

Democratic Socialism vs. Social Democracy​

Democratic SocialismSocial Democracy
More skeptical of capitalism and often seeks to transform it substantiallyAccepts capitalism but aims to regulate and soften its effects
May support worker ownership of businesses or public ownership of some industriesPrimarily focuses on redistribution, regulation, and welfare programs
Examples include some factions within left-wing parties worldwideCommon in Nordic countries

Examples​

  • Bernie Sanders identifies as a democratic socialist, though many of his policy proposals resemble European social democracy.
  • Parties with democratic socialist traditions include the Democratic Socialists of America and the Labour Party (particularly some of its historical factions).

Real-world examples​

Countries like Denmark, Sweden, and Norway are often called "socialist" in American political debates, but they are generally considered social democracies: market economies with high taxes and extensive social programs rather than democratic socialist economies.

In one sentence:

Democratic socialism seeks a more egalitarian economy and stronger public provision of essential services while preserving democracy, civil liberties, and competitive elections.
Click to expand...

From CHATGPT
Click to expand...
 
Sailor said:
All of that is correct. None of the identity as a purely democratic socialist country though.
Click to expand...



Yes, that statement is accurate. No major country today officially identifies or brands itself as a "purely democratic socialist" state in its constitution, official name, or national ideology in the way some identify as socialist republics (e.g., Vietnam or historical examples).

Why This Holds​

  • Official names and self-descriptions: Countries like the Nordics (Sweden, Norway, Denmark, etc.) describe themselves as social democracies or mixed economies with capitalist markets + strong welfare states. Their governing parties are often social democratic, but the states emphasize pragmatism, markets, and private enterprise over ideological "democratic socialism." Nordic leaders and officials have repeatedly clarified they are not socialist.
  • Sri Lanka is one partial exception: Its official name is the "Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka." However, it operates as a mixed economy with significant private sector activity, not a "pure" implementation of democratic socialism.
  • Most others (e.g., Germany, UK, France, Spain, Canada) have social democratic or labour parties that have governed and implemented welfare policies, but the countries self-identify as liberal democracies, parliamentary republics, or constitutional monarchies with market economies—not purely democratic socialist.

Context on "Purely"​

  • "Purely" is key here. Democratic socialism, as an ideology, envisions expanding democratic control into the economy (e.g., more public ownership, workplace democracy) beyond what exists in social democracies. No country claims to have fully achieved or defines its core identity around that endpoint.
  • Many have influential democratic socialist or social democratic movements/parties, and policies inspired by them, but they remain hybrids. External observers (academics, commentators, politicians like Bernie Sanders) apply the label, but governments themselves are more restrained.
In short, the claim correctly highlights that while democratic socialist ideas are present and influential in many places, no country positions itself as a pure embodiment of the ideology. This aligns with the broader point that real-world examples are pragmatic mixed systems rather than ideological purists.


 
archives said:
Already showed you the idiocy of your question, it is not dichotomy, and please spare us the Thatcher quote
Click to expand...
No you did not. This is what you said "Which is why we’ve had a mixed economy since the 18th Century, there are no straight capitalist economies in the world". What other "mixed" part of capitalism funds those programs. And be specific. Dunce.
 
Diogenes said:
Yes, that statement is accurate. No major country today officially identifies or brands itself as a "purely democratic socialist" state in its constitution, official name, or national ideology in the way some identify as socialist republics (e.g., Vietnam or historical examples).

Why This Holds​

  • Official names and self-descriptions: Countries like the Nordics (Sweden, Norway, Denmark, etc.) describe themselves as social democracies or mixed economies with capitalist markets + strong welfare states. Their governing parties are often social democratic, but the states emphasize pragmatism, markets, and private enterprise over ideological "democratic socialism." Nordic leaders and officials have repeatedly clarified they are not socialist.
  • Sri Lanka is one partial exception: Its official name is the "Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka." However, it operates as a mixed economy with significant private sector activity, not a "pure" implementation of democratic socialism.
  • Most others (e.g., Germany, UK, France, Spain, Canada) have social democratic or labour parties that have governed and implemented welfare policies, but the countries self-identify as liberal democracies, parliamentary republics, or constitutional monarchies with market economies—not purely democratic socialist.

Context on "Purely"​

  • "Purely" is key here. Democratic socialism, as an ideology, envisions expanding democratic control into the economy (e.g., more public ownership, workplace democracy) beyond what exists in social democracies. No country claims to have fully achieved or defines its core identity around that endpoint.
  • Many have influential democratic socialist or social democratic movements/parties, and policies inspired by them, but they remain hybrids. External observers (academics, commentators, politicians like Bernie Sanders) apply the label, but governments themselves are more restrained.
In short, the claim correctly highlights that while democratic socialist ideas are present and influential in many places, no country positions itself as a pure embodiment of the ideology. This aligns with the broader point that real-world examples are pragmatic mixed systems rather than ideological purists.


Click to expand...
Chat GPT

define democratic socialism

Democratic socialism is a political and economic philosophy that seeks to achieve a more equal society through democratic means—elections, legislation, and constitutional government—rather than through revolution.

The core idea is that while markets can exist, certain sectors of the economy and key services should be owned, regulated, or guaranteed for the public good.

Common principles of democratic socialism​

  • Universal healthcare
  • Strong labor unions and worker protections
  • Higher taxes on the wealthy to fund social programs
  • Affordable or free higher education
  • Robust social safety nets
  • Greater regulation of large corporations
  • In some versions, worker ownership or public ownership of certain industries

What it is not​

  • It is not the same as communism, which traditionally advocates collective ownership of nearly all means of production and, historically, has often been associated with one-party states.
  • It is not necessarily the same as social democracy, although the two overlap significantly.

Democratic Socialism vs. Social Democracy​

Democratic SocialismSocial Democracy
More skeptical of capitalism and often seeks to transform it substantiallyAccepts capitalism but aims to regulate and soften its effects
May support worker ownership of businesses or public ownership of some industriesPrimarily focuses on redistribution, regulation, and welfare programs
Examples include some factions within left-wing parties worldwideCommon in Nordic countries

Examples​

  • Bernie Sanders identifies as a democratic socialist, though many of his policy proposals resemble European social democracy.
  • Parties with democratic socialist traditions include the Democratic Socialists of America and the Labour Party (particularly some of its historical factions).

Real-world examples​

Countries like Denmark, Sweden, and Norway are often called "socialist" in American political debates, but they are generally considered social democracies: market economies with high taxes and extensive social programs rather than democratic socialist economies.

In one sentence:

Democratic socialism seeks a more egalitarian economy and stronger public provision of essential services while preserving democracy, civil liberties, and competitive elections.
Click to expand...
 
Jarod said:
Chat GPT

define democratic socialism

Democratic socialism is a political and economic philosophy that seeks to achieve a more equal society through democratic means—elections, legislation, and constitutional government—rather than through revolution.

The core idea is that while markets can exist, certain sectors of the economy and key services should be owned, regulated, or guaranteed for the public good.

Common principles of democratic socialism​

  • Universal healthcare
  • Strong labor unions and worker protections
  • Higher taxes on the wealthy to fund social programs
  • Affordable or free higher education
  • Robust social safety nets
  • Greater regulation of large corporations
  • In some versions, worker ownership or public ownership of certain industries

What it is not​

  • It is not the same as communism, which traditionally advocates collective ownership of nearly all means of production and, historically, has often been associated with one-party states.
  • It is not necessarily the same as social democracy, although the two overlap significantly.

Democratic Socialism vs. Social Democracy​

Democratic SocialismSocial Democracy
More skeptical of capitalism and often seeks to transform it substantiallyAccepts capitalism but aims to regulate and soften its effects
May support worker ownership of businesses or public ownership of some industriesPrimarily focuses on redistribution, regulation, and welfare programs
Examples include some factions within left-wing parties worldwideCommon in Nordic countries

Examples​

  • Bernie Sanders identifies as a democratic socialist, though many of his policy proposals resemble European social democracy.
  • Parties with democratic socialist traditions include the Democratic Socialists of America and the Labour Party (particularly some of its historical factions).

Real-world examples​

Countries like Denmark, Sweden, and Norway are often called "socialist" in American political debates, but they are generally considered social democracies: market economies with high taxes and extensive social programs rather than democratic socialist economies.

In one sentence:
Click to expand...
Bingo, Musk vs Grok, who is the more reliable
 
Jarod said:
Chat GPT

define democratic socialism

Democratic socialism is a political and economic philosophy that seeks to achieve a more equal society through democratic means—elections, legislation, and constitutional government—rather than through revolution.

The core idea is that while markets can exist, certain sectors of the economy and key services should be owned, regulated, or guaranteed for the public good.

Common principles of democratic socialism​

  • Universal healthcare
  • Strong labor unions and worker protections
  • Higher taxes on the wealthy to fund social programs
  • Affordable or free higher education
  • Robust social safety nets
  • Greater regulation of large corporations
  • In some versions, worker ownership or p
  • Jarod said:
    Chat GPT

    define democratic socialism

    Democratic socialism is a political and economic philosophy that seeks to achieve a more equal society through democratic means—elections, legislation, and constitutional government—rather than through revolution.

    The core idea is that while markets can exist, certain sectors of the economy and key services should be owned, regulated, or guaranteed for the public good.

    Common principles of democratic socialism​

    • Universal healthcare
    • Strong labor unions and worker protections
    • Higher taxes on the wealthy to fund social programs
    • Affordable or free higher education
    • Robust social safety nets
    • Greater regulation of large corporations
    • In some versions, worker ownership or public ownership of certain industries

    What it is not​

    • It is not the same as communism, which traditionally advocates collective ownership of nearly all means of production and, historically, has often been associated with one-party states.
    • It is not necessarily the same as social democracy, although the two overlap significantly.

    Democratic Socialism vs. Social Democracy​

    Democratic SocialismSocial Democracy
    More skeptical of capitalism and often seeks to transform it substantiallyAccepts capitalism but aims to regulate and soften its effects
    May support worker ownership of businesses or public ownership of some industriesPrimarily focuses on redistribution, regulation, and welfare programs
    Examples include some factions within left-wing parties worldwideCommon in Nordic countries

    Examples​

    • Bernie Sanders identifies as a democratic socialist, though many of his policy proposals resemble European social democracy.
    • Parties with democratic socialist traditions include the Democratic Socialists of America and the Labour Party (particularly some of its historical factions).

    Real-world examples​

    Countries like Denmark, Sweden, and Norway are often called "socialist" in American political debates, but they are generally considered social democracies: market economies with high taxes and extensive social programs rather than democratic socialist economies.

    In one sentence:
    Click to expand...
Click to expand...



Yes, ChatGPT's summary is mostly accurate and balanced. It captures the mainstream understanding of democratic socialism well, especially the distinctions and real-world nuances. Here's a quick breakdown with some refinements based on the ongoing discussion:

Strengths of the Definition​

  • Core idea: Correct — democratic means (elections, reforms) to achieve greater equality, with markets allowed but key sectors/services heavily regulated or socialized for the public good.
  • Principles: Spot-on list (universal healthcare, strong unions, progressive taxation, education access, safety nets, corporate regulation, and in stronger versions, more public/worker ownership).
  • What it is not: Good clarification vs. communism (avoids authoritarian one-party models and near-total collective ownership).
  • Vs. Social Democracy: The table is a useful distinction. Democratic socialists are often more ambitious about transforming capitalism (e.g., expanding public ownership or economic democracy), while social democrats focus on taming it through welfare and regulation within capitalism.
  • Examples: Fair — Bernie Sanders and DSA explicitly use the label. Nordic countries are frequently called democratic socialist in U.S. debates but self-identify more as social democracies.

Minor Refinements​

  • The overlap between democratic socialism and social democracy is even larger in practice than the table suggests. Many "democratic socialist" parties and policies have converged toward social democratic outcomes.
  • Real-world examples: No country is a pure democratic socialist state (as we discussed). The Nordics are the closest practical models cited by advocates, but they are capitalist market economies with generous welfare. Some Latin American or other cases (e.g., Bolivia under certain governments, or parties in Nepal/Sri Lanka) have claimed stronger democratic socialist orientations, but with mixed results on democracy and economics.

One-Sentence Summary (Improved)​

Democratic socialism is a left-wing ideology that aims to use democratic institutions to achieve socialist goals—such as economic equality, public control of key resources, and strong social rights—while rejecting authoritarian methods and often accepting a role for regulated markets.

This aligns with our earlier points: the original claim ("There are NO other countries that are democratic socialist") is false if we're talking about countries with democratic socialist parties, policies, or self-described elements. But it's closer to true if requiring a "pure" self-identified democratic socialist state (which essentially doesn't exist at scale today). The distinction between the ideology and actual governing systems is important.
 
Diogenes said:
Yes, ChatGPT's summary is mostly accurate and balanced. It captures the mainstream understanding of democratic socialism well, especially the distinctions and real-world nuances. Here's a quick breakdown with some refinements based on the ongoing discussion:

Strengths of the Definition​

  • Core idea: Correct — democratic means (elections, reforms) to achieve greater equality, with markets allowed but key sectors/services heavily regulated or socialized for the public good.
  • Principles: Spot-on list (universal healthcare, strong unions, progressive taxation, education access, safety nets, corporate regulation, and in stronger versions, more public/worker ownership).
  • What it is not: Good clarification vs. communism (avoids authoritarian one-party models and near-total collective ownership).
  • Vs. Social Democracy: The table is a useful distinction. Democratic socialists are often more ambitious about transforming capitalism (e.g., expanding public ownership or economic democracy), while social democrats focus on taming it through welfare and regulation within capitalism.
  • Examples: Fair — Bernie Sanders and DSA explicitly use the label. Nordic countries are frequently called democratic socialist in U.S. debates but self-identify more as social democracies.

Minor Refinements​

  • The overlap between democratic socialism and social democracy is even larger in practice than the table suggests. Many "democratic socialist" parties and policies have converged toward social democratic outcomes.
  • Real-world examples: No country is a pure democratic socialist state (as we discussed). The Nordics are the closest practical models cited by advocates, but they are capitalist market economies with generous welfare. Some Latin American or other cases (e.g., Bolivia under certain governments, or parties in Nepal/Sri Lanka) have claimed stronger democratic socialist orientations, but with mixed results on democracy and economics.

One-Sentence Summary (Improved)​

Democratic socialism is a left-wing ideology that aims to use democratic institutions to achieve socialist goals—such as economic equality, public control of key resources, and strong social rights—while rejecting authoritarian methods and often accepting a role for regulated markets.

This aligns with our earlier points: the original claim ("There are NO other countries that are democratic socialist") is false if we're talking about countries with democratic socialist parties, policies, or self-described elements. But it's closer to true if requiring a "pure" self-identified democratic socialist state (which essentially doesn't exist at scale today). The distinction between the ideology and actual governing systems is important.
Click to expand...
There are NO countries that are pure Capitolist.
 
Jarod said:
I Believe that is how voters are also. The party takes one stance, the Candidate usually differs some.
Click to expand...
Show me any DSA that has won office in the past year that has not run on a very strong pro Palestine position and being very critical of Israel.
 
Diogenes said:
Archives' reply is a dismissive ad hominem rather than substantive engagement.


He attributes the analysis to "copied and pasted Musk bullshitted opinions" and challenges Musk (not me) on the original claim. This is a common deflection tactic: avoid the definitional/economic argument by tying it to a disliked figure.


Quick clarification​


  • My analysis is not Musk's words or opinions. It draws from standard dictionary/encyclopedia definitions of socialism (collective ownership of means of production), economic distinctions between public goods/welfare and systemic socialism, and U.S. fiscal realities. These are mainstream views shared by many economists, historians, and classical liberals — not unique to Musk.
  • Musk has criticized expansive welfare/entitlements (e.g., calling Social Security a "Ponzi" in sustainability terms and supporting efficiency reforms), while supporting targeted government roles in some areas. But he is not the source here.

On the substance (again)​


The core claim still doesn't hold: Government services and social programs existed long before modern socialism and are funded by the productive private economy in mixed systems. You don't need "socialism" (as defined by Sailor or standard sources) to have police, fire departments, or even social insurance — you need a functional government with a tax base, which capitalism has historically generated more effectively at scale.


This is why the rebuttal is weak. It doesn't refute the ownership-based definition or address funding mechanics; it just repeats the assertion and attacks the messenger. Forums gonna forum.
Click to expand...
Musk is wrong again, I asked you to ask Musk a direct question and he returns with my question is an ad hominen, how does that happen
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top