How Mary Jo Kopechne was a victim of the Kennedys TWICE

Frank Apisa said:
The fact that these people are actually digging back this far...in order to make themselves feel okay about enabling the abomination now in the Oval Office...

...actually is funny.

Imagine that much desperation!

images
Click to expand...


The only mention of Trump is from you losers. It is coming up because of the movie. Were you not following? Or do you think the movie is being released to help Trump? Please tell me that is what you think. Please. Please. Please.
 
Sailor said:
You certainly are all three. And just love rushing back in to prove it.
Click to expand...

Nope...I am not any of those three.

But I, like so many people here in the forum, are so easily able to get you to act the schoolyard chump.

You are a delight, Sailor.

AJLlDp2h164Oinm5LhIO8B8POWJxvk6m_IXLfDZT=s900-mo-c-c0xffffffff-rj-k-no
 
I Love America said:
The only mention of Trump is from you losers. It is coming up because of the movie. Were you not following? Or do you think the movie is being released to help Trump? Please tell me that is what you think. Please. Please. Please.
Click to expand...

Okay...I will.

The fact that these people are actually digging back this far...in order to make themselves feel okay about enabling the abomination now in the Oval Office...

...actually is funny.

Imagine that much desperation!


images
 
Leonthecat said:
You dodder much more than Frank.
He doesn't resort to senile-like ad hom like you always do when you run out of argument and your frustration mounts.
Click to expand...

Anything to avoid having to answer for your bullshit again huh Peon? How about you work on answering this which you are avoiding: Guilty of drunken murder huh? How about the court records stating that, ah, Mr. "Dry Drowning"???
 
Frank Apisa said:
Well, I guess you could. But then you'd have to learn how to spell "delight."
Click to expand...

Sailor's impotent rage becomes palpable as soon as he quickly runs out of argument. Once he starts in with the childish school yard ad homs, you can rest assured you have won the debate.
It's fun to watch. Once he resorts to the phrase,"limp wristed" you know you have him.
Not many members let you know as soon as they have been out maneuvered like Sailor does.
He's not very bright .
LOL
 
Leonthecat said:
Sailor's impotent rage becomes palpable as soon as he quickly runs out of argument. Once he starts in with the childish school yard ad homs, you can rest assured you have won the debate.
It's fun to watch. Once he resorts to the phrase,"limp wristed" you know you have him.
Not many members let you know they have been out maneuvered like Sailor does.
He's not very bright .
LOL
Click to expand...

A sure sign you lost again Peon. You should be used to that by now. So when are you going to prove that Laura Bush was convicted of murder for drunk driving? Better yet, when are you going to prove your completely and inaccurate statements about drowning and drowning victims? No need to try and change the subject to avoid those again.
 
Sailor said:
Anything to avoid having to answer for your bullshit again huh Peon? How about you work on answering this which you are avoiding: Guilty of drunken murder huh? How about the court records stating that, ah, Mr. "Dry Drowning"???
Click to expand...

Dry drowning can, and does, happen, Mr Limp wrist.
Mrs Bush was protected from vehicular homicide charges when her daddy intervened and stopped authorities from subjecting her to a sobriety test.
No record exists either way as to how drunk she was because she was never tested, contrary to Midland County protocall in 1963.
Circumstances indicate that there was a successful cover up.
 
Leonthecat said:
Dry drowning can, and does, happen, Mr Limp wrist.
Mrs Bush was protected from vehicular homicide charges when her daddy intervened and stopped authorities from subjecting her to a sobriety test.
No record exists either way as to how drunk she was because she was never tested, contrary to Midland County protocall in 1963.
Click to expand...

You stated Dry Drowning happens all the time. And more importantly, that the victim never has water in their lungs or stomach, which is completely wrong again. Short memory there fucknut? As far as the rest, pure conjecture. Like your first statement, no fact at all. Just like everything you post. No fact, just trying to come across as educated in which you fail every time. You google educate dumb fuck you.
 
Leonthecat said:
She was a negligent and distracted driver and that negligence killed a schoolmate, a popular boy whom she had dated the year before, of that there can be no doubt.
It has never been proved that she was not drinking that fateful November night. No tests were done on Miss Welch but it was established fact that she and her girlfriend were on their way to a party at a drive-in in Midland Texas, where under aged drinking was known to have occurred.
Her father, Harold Welch, was a wealthy real estate developer in the Midland area and his influence certainly had some bearing on the forgoing of of a sobriety test on the, self admitted reckless 17 year old, which was standard procedure in Midland County for all fatal or serious car accidents.
We will never know for sure due to the lack of a sobriety test, but it remains likely that Dubya did marry a murderer.
At the time of their marriage Dubya had his own drinking problems, so he probably sympathized with Laura's drunken experiences.
Click to expand...

It is called an ACCIDENT, you ridiculous moron. The majority of ACCIDENTS are caused by distracted drivers.

Seriously, Did you pass the 6th grade?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top