USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
It is a business open to the public. Try again.
And when the owner asks you to leave and you don't, you are now trespassing.
It is a business open to the public. Try again.
Nonsense. You right wing snowflakes are so easily offended. She called Bannon a "piece of trash" (which he is), and the store owner is going to call the cops? Give it a break. If it had not been Bannon the guy would never have noticed. However, we have to protect the sniveling right wing snowflakes.
Hey childlike dog dick, you have to have a legitimate complaint. Calling one a "piece of trash" is not "disorderly conduct", and she would never have been arrested.
Hey childlike dog dick, you have to have a legitimate complaint. Calling one a "piece of trash" is not "disorderly conduct", and she would never have been arrested.
"Page 315 U. S. 573
On the authority of its earlier decisions, the state court declared that the statute's purpose was to preserve the public peace, no words being "forbidden except such as have a direct tendency to cause acts of violence by the persons to whom, individually, the remark is addressed." [Footnote 7] It was further said:
"The word 'offensive' is not to be defined in terms of what a particular addressee thinks. . . . The test is what men of common intelligence would understand would be words likely to cause an average addressee to fight. . . . The English language has a number of words and expressions which, by general consent, are 'fighting words' when said without a disarming smile. . . .uch words, as ordinary men know, are likely to cause a fight. So are threatening, profane or obscene revilings. Derisive and annoying words can be taken as coming within the purview of the statute as heretofore interpreted only when they have this characteristic of plainly tending to excite the addressee to a breach of the peace. . . . The statute, as construed, does no more than prohibit the face-to-face words plainly likely to cause a breach of the peace by the addressee, words whose speaking constitutes a breach of the peace by the speaker -- including 'classical fighting words,' words in current use less 'classical' but equally likely to cause violence, and other disorderly words, including profanity, obscenity and threats."
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/315/568/case.html
You gonna be caused to fight when called a "piece of trash"?
Pussy.
It's a racist slur frequently used by racist liberals.
Really? Which race uses it and which race is it aimed at?
Pussy
It's a racist slur. Why don't you just say white n****r, ... cause that's what you're thinking.
Paradox for Conservatives, Current Events Forum #91 (6/18/18) - My post:
"I have little to no patience with liars or the willfully ignorant. Both are choices and cretinous and foolish people make. We are all ignorant of certain things, but to remain willfully so is inexcusable."
Legion is a Crybaby, Off Topic Forum #(6/26/18) - Your Post:
"I have little to no patience with liars or the willfully ignorant. Both are choices and cretinous and foolish people make. We are all ignorant of certain things, but to remain willfully so is inexcusable."
Black and white, lying, plagiarizing stalkerboy
Nope. That's not what I was thinking. I was thinking along the lines of Bannon being a piece of shit more than a piece of trash. That must be racist, too.
You're a fucking idiot, pal. Every goddam thing to you has racist connotations.
What color was the woman, BTW?
Moron
It is either freakishly weird that a rightwing loser would plagiarize you word for word, or you could take it as a compliment. Apparently there are some righting dunces who read and admire your writing enough to wish they could write like you.
Whenever any liberal calls a White person trash, ... it is an obvious racial slur, racist.
Thanks, but I sure don't take it as a compliment from this stalker.
Now, I see he regularly uses my posts as a marquee banner in his posts.
Said he wanted to piss in my water supply.
Now, THAT's some major league stalking, even for this forum!
The owner of the private property asked her to leave. She refused, he called the cops. She was trespassing on private property at the point she refused to leave.
Just as the ones at Starbucks were, right?
But you had a problem when Sanders was asked to leave the Red Hen did you not? Hypocrisy much?
