How to handle confrontational liberals.

The person would have to show some injury, illness, emotional or psychological duress. Bannon is not going to let some words bother him--I'm sure he heard worse from Trump.

The White House has issued a fiery statement in which President Donald Trump says former top aide Steve Bannon "lost his mind" and is "only in it for himself."
http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-statement-steve-bannon-trump-bad-manager-2018-1
 
You want me to take your word for it? No.

Please note that I am not calling you a liar. I am saying that without evidence there can be no certainty.

Whether or not you believe has no bearing on it having taken place. I thought you'd be smart enough to realize that. Apparently you think your belief, or disbelief, of anything is the determining factor of fact.
 
Whether or not you believe has no bearing on it having taken place. I thought you'd be smart enough to realize that. Apparently you think your belief, or disbelief, of anything is the determining factor of fact.

Is that what you got out of what I said?

What I said, and what I believe is that without evidence there can be no certainty.

You provided no evidence for your anecdote, therefore...
 
Is that what you got out of what I said?

What I said, and what I believe is that without evidence there can be no certainty.

You provided no evidence for your anecdote, therefore...

You said you didn't believe it because you didn't have evidence. Again, whether or not you believe isn't the determining factor in it having or not having happened.

Be certain it happened whether you believe it or not.
 
You lie.

What she claimed I said was this:



I emphatically denying ever saying that I wish Rana would contact cancer.

I do wish her cancer would come back and finish her off, of course, but I'm not particular, as long as she croaks. the sooner the better, naturally.

As for karma, I'm not superstitious. Peddle your bogeyman BS somewhere else.

You are one sick SOB to wish anyone die. Watch what you wish for it could very well happen to you.
 
You think consistent application of standards is a "leftist style tactic"?

Have you shared this notion with Christiecrite or Zappacrite?

:rofl2:

BTW, I am an asshole, and a poseur. I make no secret of either fact, Captain Obvious.

If you need s safe space, watch this:


You're more like a pussy that has found a safe space behind his keyboard. Anyone with as many profiles as you have can't be anything but a coward.
 
I believe nothing that I don't see evidence for. Is that an unusual concept in your neck of the woods?

Again, whether or not YOU believe it isn't the determining factor of the truth. Is that the usual concept in your cowardly circle of existence?
 
You're more like a pussy that has found a safe space behind his keyboard. Anyone with as many profiles as you have can't be anything but a coward.

Is that so? What is the allowable number of profiles a person can have in your imaginary world?
 
Again, whether or not YOU believe it isn't the determining factor of the truth. Is that the usual concept in your cowardly circle of existence?

Lack of evidence is a valid reason for skepticism. Don't take my word for it. You could look it up if you know how.
 
Is that so? What is the allowable number of profiles a person can have in your imaginary world?

Apparently how many ever the powers that be whose dick you suck allow you to have.

It's OK. If you need that many safe spaces, it says a lot about the miserable life you live.
 
Lack of evidence is a valid reason for skepticism. Don't take my word for it. You could look it up if you know how.

Your skepticism, however, is the determining factor as to whether or not something happened.

I don't care if you believe me. Perhaps you can't handle the truth.
 
Back
Top