HOW TO QIUICKLY AND EFFECTIVELY SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF THE IRANIAN REGIME

Nordberg said:
Ike told Truman the bomb was unnecessary and not needed. He said there were talks with other nations that said Japan wanted out. It was over. Truman was probably justifying the incredible amounts of money the bomb consumed, Japan had no planes and we were bombing city after city.
Click to expand...
In spite of the damage we inflicted with fire bombing which exceeded the deaths of the nukes these people were not quitting. Down to the last man, woman or child.

Read James Bradley's book flyboys and your opinion may change. These motherfuckers were barbarians and needed nuking.
 
I resisted opening this thread for awhile because I didn't want to look at the shit I knew I'd find.

But curiosity finally got the better of me.

Just what I figured it would be.

Some drooler idiot babbling about wiping out an entire country civilians and all.

Women, children, babies...

How sick do you have to be, to be a MAGA turd anyway?
 
DACHSHUND DAWG said:
The only way to eliminate the current problems and future threats posed by the radical, 12-er Mahdist Shia Muslim Regime in Iran (which is a deranged murderous, apocalyptic DEATH CULT is to completely crush it. That is to eliminate every single supporter: - military, clerical, political and civilian of the theocracy and its demented, violent, militaristic ideology.


I suggest that Israel do this asap using its nuclear weapons.


It worked for Harry Trueman when he dropped "Little Boy" and "Fat Man" on Japan in 1945. Trueman actually had no option in any case. Nuking HIROSHIMA and NAGASAKI. was not pretty, but the alternative means - (to forcing an unconditional surrender from Hirohito was much, much uglier. AND TODAY NO SERIOUS HISTORIAN criticises Trueman for his decision.


Later Yanks, later..............


Regards


Dachshund the wonder Hound

DLM - DACHSHUND LIVES MATTER !!
Click to expand...
Hmm, the Nazi Dog from Down Under (allegedly) advocates for Israel to use nukes (of which they deny they have) on Iran.

:whoa::palm:

Of course, he cares not for the effect of the blast and subsequent fallout on neighboring countries, American military bases and embassies of various nations. No, he's just having some weird waking wet dream of seeing people he deems inferior lay waste to each other. And since his flabby ass is safe and sound across an ocean, it's all a spectator sport for him, as Nazi filth has little empathy for others.

And of course, EVERY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD WOULD DEEM ISRAEL A ROUGE NATION TO BE DEALT WITH. The USA would stupidly come to its defense, etc., etc., blah, blah, blah.

Our Nazi Weiner has surpassed himself in proud stupidity on this one. Not surprising.
 
N. Korea has become satisfied, more or less, with what it has. Iran still thinks it can be a shark in the pond when it's really just a minnow.
 
Libhater said:
I will admit that that option of nuking the current most evil/murderous anti West-anti human nation on earth is quite interesting and quite necessary. However, our greatest potus ever Trump will take care of Iran forever without harming most if not all of the innocent Iranian civilians with his clever deal making.
Click to expand...

I absolutely hope and pray that you are correct.



-
 
Libhater said:
I will admit that that option of nuking the current most evil/murderous anti West-anti human nation on earth is quite interesting and quite necessary. However, our greatest potus ever Trump will take care of Iran forever without harming most if not all of the innocent Iranian civilians with his clever deal making.
Click to expand...
Do you know our history with Iran, or thst it was NEVER a threat to American soil or waters? See post #25.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top