ExpressLane
Verified User
Didn't the Dems ROAST Trump for disagreeing with the intelligence community. And now the Dems are disagreeing with the intelligence community.This is nonsense...
Ratcliffe flat stated that this is nonsense.

Didn't the Dems ROAST Trump for disagreeing with the intelligence community. And now the Dems are disagreeing with the intelligence community.This is nonsense...
Ratcliffe flat stated that this is nonsense.

This is nonsense...
Ratcliffe flat stated that this is nonsense.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...d-biden-emails-dni-ratcliffe-says/3712484001/
DNI Ratcliffe: Russia disinformation not behind published emails targeting Biden; FBI reviewing
Obviously, Ratcliffe isn't a credible voice, and it seems pretty clear he's just playing the political role he was appointed for in the first place.”This is nonsense...
Ratcliffe flat stated that this is nonsense.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...d-biden-emails-dni-ratcliffe-says/3712484001/
DNI Ratcliffe: Russia disinformation not behind published emails targeting Biden; FBI reviewing
This is nonsense...
Ratcliffe flat stated that this is nonsense.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...d-biden-emails-dni-ratcliffe-says/3712484001/
DNI Ratcliffe: Russia disinformation not behind published emails targeting Biden; FBI reviewing
This is nonsense...
Ratcliffe flat stated that this is nonsense.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...d-biden-emails-dni-ratcliffe-says/3712484001/
DNI Ratcliffe: Russia disinformation not behind published emails targeting Biden; FBI reviewing
Isn’t there a list of fifty such prior intelligence personnel doing exactly that? And if you are referring to the Brennans and Comeys, first, why would they, and second, they might realize doing such would just give it more air inside the Fox bubble
Isn’t there a list of fifty such prior intelligence personnel doing exactly that? And if you are referring to the Brennans and Comeys, first, why would they, and second, they might realize doing such would just give it more air inside the Fox bubble
Trump begging Bill Barr to save him is a sign that his attempt to ‘corrupt the election’ is imploding: columnist
“Trump just went on “Fox & Friends” and called on Attorney General William P. Barr to launch some kind of investigation into the new pseudo-scandal involving Joe Biden and his son Hunter’s laptop that Trump and his propagandists have been hyping of late,” Sargent writes, adding that the spectacle amounted to Trump “practically pleading with Barr to salvage his reelection hopes” on national television.
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/10/tr...-corrupt-the-election-is-imploding-columnist/

Isn't the bolded contradictory?
What nonsense; the NY post story????????????????
Bingo, there is exactly the strategy of Rudi’s Hunter Email malarkey, “doesn’t matter it it is true or not,” the goal is to float the innuendo
The problem is Biden has two GOP Senate investigations negating any wrong doing and the fact most Americans have already dismissed the “truth ain’t the truth” Rudi’s “October surprise,” this ain’t 2016, and COVID, not Fox innuendo, is what Americans are concerned with today
Luntz just said if Trump's people think Biden's son will be a winning campaign issue they have their heads up their asses. There are issues people vote on and this is not one of them.
Luntz just said if Trump's people think Biden's son will be a winning campaign issue they have their heads up their asses. There are issues people vote on and this is not one of them.