Hypocrisy never slows a leftist down, does it?

Diogenes

Nemo me impune lacessit
Contributor
View: https://x.com/SaltyCracker9/status/2087606112279466091?s=20





Is it true his wife won't accept Medicare in her practice?



Yes, the claim is accurate based on multiple independent reports.


The X post by @SaltyCracker9 refers to Michigan Democrat Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed (quoting a clip of him supporting Medicare for All, including gender-affirming care).


His wife is psychiatrist Sarah Jukaku (also referred to as Dr. Sarah Jukaku), who runs a practice called Mind Work Psychiatry in Ann Arbor, Michigan.


Key facts:


  • She started the solo private practice around 2024 after working as co-chief of psychiatry at University of Michigan Health (which does accept Medicare).
  • She formally opted out of Medicare in March 2025 (records confirm this). As an opt-out provider, she cannot bill Medicare; patients pay fully out of pocket.
  • Her practice operates on a fee-for-service/cash-pay basis. Patients pay her directly; those with private insurance may seek partial out-of-network reimbursement (after deductibles), but Medicare patients cannot.
  • Her website previously stated this clearly (e.g., FAQ: “Do you accept my insurance? No.” and notes that she is “out of network for all insurance companies”). Psychology Today listings similarly described it as a fee-for-service practice not in network with any insurance. After media attention in July 2026, some of this language was removed/scrubbed, and the site was later restricted.

This creates a clear contrast with El-Sayed’s platform.


He has repeatedly advocated for Medicare for All (“from cradle to grave,” covering all necessary care without premiums/copays/deductibles, and has said he “literally wrote the book” on it).


He has also criticized low reimbursement rates as undervaluing psychiatry and has attacked providers who limit access based on insurance/payment ability, but the specific “no insurance at all” model for his wife’s practice is documented.


No credible contrary evidence has emerged that she accepts Medicare or is in-network with insurers.


The couple’s reported 2025 income was nearly $686,000, consistent with a high-earning private cash practice. The claim in the post holds up.



 
View: https://x.com/SaltyCracker9/status/2087606112279466091?s=20





Is it true his wife won't accept Medicare in her practice?



Yes, the claim is accurate based on multiple independent reports.


The X post by @SaltyCracker9 refers to Michigan Democrat Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed (quoting a clip of him supporting Medicare for All, including gender-affirming care).


His wife is psychiatrist Sarah Jukaku (also referred to as Dr. Sarah Jukaku), who runs a practice called Mind Work Psychiatry in Ann Arbor, Michigan.


Key facts:


  • She started the solo private practice around 2024 after working as co-chief of psychiatry at University of Michigan Health (which does accept Medicare).
  • She formally opted out of Medicare in March 2025 (records confirm this). As an opt-out provider, she cannot bill Medicare; patients pay fully out of pocket.
  • Her practice operates on a fee-for-service/cash-pay basis. Patients pay her directly; those with private insurance may seek partial out-of-network reimbursement (after deductibles), but Medicare patients cannot.
  • Her website previously stated this clearly (e.g., FAQ: “Do you accept my insurance? No.” and notes that she is “out of network for all insurance companies”). Psychology Today listings similarly described it as a fee-for-service practice not in network with any insurance. After media attention in July 2026, some of this language was removed/scrubbed, and the site was later restricted.

This creates a clear contrast with El-Sayed’s platform.


He has repeatedly advocated for Medicare for All (“from cradle to grave,” covering all necessary care without premiums/copays/deductibles, and has said he “literally wrote the book” on it).


He has also criticized low reimbursement rates as undervaluing psychiatry and has attacked providers who limit access based on insurance/payment ability, but the specific “no insurance at all” model for his wife’s practice is documented.


No credible contrary evidence has emerged that she accepts Medicare or is in-network with insurers.


The couple’s reported 2025 income was nearly $686,000, consistent with a high-earning private cash practice. The claim in the post holds up.



They think they are invisible and that we can't see their hypocrisy
 
They think they are invisible and that we can't see their hypocrisy

I doubt that they "think". But the absence of consequences means they have zero incentive to stop.

View: https://x.com/Rothmus/status/2087707025534803980?s=20


I can only hope that the final solution is at hand.

What do I mean?

 
HQbygYvXgAArGu5
 
Back
Top