Don't be a brainless moron. Formal logic is not your strong suit. If you were to actually become a little more proficient, you wouldn't have to pivot to ad hominem every single point.
... and if that is your definition, and that did not happen, say only 4.2 million Jews were killed in that manner, then you become forced to admit that the Holocaust didn't happen. If it is pointed out that Jews couldn't not have been murdered because "murder" implies illegality, and Hitler made it completely legal to kill Jews, you have to concede that that Holocaust, as you have defined it, did not happen.
So, now we get to the point where you show that what I define as the Holocaust actually happened ... which is your argument. You haven't even gotten out of the starting gate, owing to your apparent inability to formulate a rational argument, much less prove any sort of point.
I never did. Now we're back to your absence of English reading comprehension.
I made no point to support, other than you can't read and that you don't even know what an undefined buzzword is, and you illustrustrated this for me perfectly, thank you.
The ball is still in your court.