I NEED AN ANERICAN TO EXPLAIN SOMETHING TO ME

Ahh, the Nazi Dog from Down Under (allegedly) is on his soapbox again. hoping to be the next Goebbels.

Note that this fascist weiner dog IGNORES the antics of the current administration... documented as the most corrupt and anti-Constitutional one in American history. Nope, better to regurgitate the revisionist maga clap trap that can't pass the legal muster of proof by trial.

Tough toenails noodles. The world isn't buying it anymore. And there's not a fucking thing you can do about it except whine like a sad little parrot. Zeig Heil, baby. 😬😆🖕
 
DACHSHUND DAWG said:
I AM AN AUSTRALIAN, THOUGH I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN VERY INTERESTED IN AMERICAN POLITICS.




There is something that I I find very puzzling, so I am hoping someone can explain it for me. (?)




My query is, "Why is it that top-level politicians who are found to have been guilty of breaking the law, are never held accountable. Here are some examples....




HILLARY CLINTION has broken the law (IN A BIG WAY) on numerous occasions, and there is plenty of incontrovertible cold hard, objective evidence to prove this. Just one example was the private server email scandlal she was caught up in. She was guilty, the evidence was/is ttere to prove it, yet she walked free. She should have been jailed. Hillary was also nailed well and truly for her role in the '"RUSSIA -GATE" SCANDAL; she was the one that kicked of the crooked '"Steele Dossier" debacle. This stuff was treason; any half-decent prosecutor could make that case in a Court of law. Yet no one really seems to give a fuck that Politians like Hilary and Obama can break every law in the book, AND get caught, - but ultimately, they know that they're untouchable and they'll just get to walk free AND WHY ? Because that just the way it is, Buddy - don't waste your time and energy getting upset about it. Heaps of people in America know that they SHOULD be behind bars, but that';s not going to happen. But that's not going to happen, and no one seems to give shit.?





Then you have a member of Congress - a big-mouthed one at - ILHAN OMAR. ILHAN OMAR is a criminally corrupt piece of shit; if your an American who hasn't worked that out, then you must be retarded. She should have either been given a LONG jail sentence OR preferably DEPORTED from the US by now. The evidence of her criminal activities STICK OUT LIKE DOG'S BALLS. But despite this the authorities have been playing silly buggers with her. They know she is a crook but they just keep fiddle-assing about with her. Meanwhile, she is free as a bird and stirring up even more trouble for the government. It's UNBELIEVABLE. And all of this is beside the fact that OMAR is also a psychopathic, Darkie (anyone who marries her own biological brother - ( who was/ is , in fact, a screaming faggot, and as queer and dodgy as a $3 - dollar bill, is, by definition, a psychopathic liar and deceiver) -- as a means to defraud the US Immigration authorities is not the kind of person you want to have living in America- ILHAN OMAR apart from being a criminal is a Somalian ISLAMIST who has no desire whatsoever to do anything but criticize , disparage, insult and subvert America. If you don't know this., listen carefully .....Muslims (i.e. followers of the religion called ISLAM) think America is evil and needs to be conquered, by any means that will get the job done, so that every American in the US who is not slaughtered. by a Jihadist, or eliminated by some other method, is forced to kiss Allah's primitive, Third-World ass-hole for the rest of his life.




So, you tell me - "Why are individuals like: Barack Obama; Hilary Clinton, James Comer and Ilhan Omar, not already behind bars or deported from the US?




DACHSHUND DAWG - THE WONDER HOUND

DLM .... DACHSHUND LIVES MATTER!!
Click to expand...
Yeah, those are fake crap from RWNJ propaganda sources.

tRump OTOH has been convicted of 34 felonies and and not only is he still running around loose he is useing his corrupt power to pardon other criminals.
 
www.latimes.com

Ex-House Sergeant-at-Arms Sentenced to 2 Years : Scandal: Russ also must pay $445,000 and perform community service. He pleaded guilty to embezzlement, fraud and filing a false report.

Former House Sergeant-at-Arms Jack Russ, a powerful Capitol Hill figure who once ran the scandal-scarred House bank, was sentenced Friday to two years in prison for embezzlement, fraud and filing a false report.
www.latimes.com www.latimes.com


The guy most responsible for the house banking scandal was hired by the majority party in those days
 
In many ways, Russ symbolized a free-and-easy way of doing business on Capitol Hill that was in effect when he started as a doorkeeper in 1967 and worked his way up the patronage ranks until he was elected House sergeant-at-arms in 1982.

Since his departure, House leaders have established a merit system for hiring for most jobs that once were under control of the majority party. They have also appointed professional administrators to run non-legislative services.
 
evince said:
In many ways, Russ symbolized a free-and-easy way of doing business on Capitol Hill that was in effect when he started as a doorkeeper in 1967 and worked his way up the patronage ranks until he was elected House sergeant-at-arms in 1982.

Since his departure, House leaders have established a merit system for hiring for most jobs that once were under control of the majority party. They have also appointed professional administrators to run non-legislative services.
Click to expand...
Great to know it has to be done without politics now huh
 
archives said:
Whatever Murdoch entry you are following it is keeping you uninformed

As Comey, the head of the FBi, after investigating, said Hillary wasn’t guilty, you going to follow the usual MAGA textbook and tell us next Comey was crooked? Second, RussiaGate was real, it wasn’t Hillary that bugged Democrat headquarters nor who Fox went to to release the tapes of what Russia stole from Democrats headquarters. And explain to is specifically why Junior, Paul, and Jared were eagerly meeting with Russians in Trump Tower?

The rest of your post is just more Murdoch conspiracies void of any actual documentation, you know your man Rupert didn’t lose a three quarters of a billion dollar lawsuit because he spread facts

And none of those individuals are behind bars because in America one isn’t guilty by innuendo
Click to expand...
I'm sorry that's just noy correct.

With regard to Hilary, she wasone who cooked up the the whole idea of the Steeloe dossirer she went through
T. A. Gardner said:
They are if it involves sex. Corruption involving monetary fraud, vice, or graft gets them a slap on the wrist. The two you mention are nothing compared to some past ones. Look up the House banking scandal.

House Banking Scandal

www.nndb.com www.nndb.com


House banking scandal - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...

archives said:
Whatever Murdoch entry you are following it is keeping you uninformed

As Comey, the head of the FBi, after investigating, said Hillary wasn’t guilty, you going to follow the usual MAGA textbook and tell us next Comey was crooked? Second, RussiaGate was real, it wasn’t Hillary that bugged Democrat headquarters nor who Fox went to to release the tapes of what Russia stole from Democrats headquarters. And explain to is specifically why Junior, Paul, and Jared were eagerly meeting with Russians in Trump Tower?

The rest of your post is just more Murdoch conspiracies void of any actual documentation, you know your man Rupert didn’t lose a three quarters of a billion dollar lawsuit because he spread facts

And none of those individuals are behind bars because in America one isn’t guilty by innuendo
Click to expand...

Hey, ANCHOVIES!

Can I start by saying that you are a mystery to me. On the one hand you are able to write English that is grammatically and syntactically sound. You are able to spell correctly, and you have quite a good vocabulary. What, you write also shows evidence of reasonable rational thought processes. Yet for all this, you still remain a lefty/Liberal clown, in terms of your world - view and political ideology. It doesn't make sense?? Itis weirder than Tampon Tim" Walz!!


Any in response to your remarks (above). let me just say..................



I'm sorry, but Hilary Clinton cooked up the whole notion of the bogus "Steel Dossier" in 2015. She went to the Democrat Party's favourite law firm at the time (the one they had used for years) - '"Perkins Coie" ,"and took advice from one of their slipperiest Senior shysters named.," Marc Elias', who is totally unscrupulous and crooked - even by the standard of a DC Democrat mouthpiece !even for a lawyer. Elias hooked her up with an oppo-research firm called "Fusion GPS, and Fusion GPS hooked up with Christopher Steele, an ex-MI-6 British spy, and got him to dig dirt on Trump. The result was the "Steel Dossier" which was such a ridiculous pile of trash and amateurish fiction that no US government intelligence officer ever took it seriously. It was plain as the nose on your face that the entire dossier was pure bullshit. It read like something a 13-year-old - child with a lively imagination could have put together as a "spy story" for a High School English class creative writing assignment.



Steele's fee for taking om the job of digging dirt on Trump and putting it together in his dossier was over 1000,000 (USD which was paid for by the DNC and Hilary's 2015/6 election campaign funds. As for, Obama, he was up to his neck in the "Steele Dossier" hoax and r a fistful of "fall-out" in the form of "dirty (illegal) deeds" that quickly t turned the "RUSSIA-GATE" fiction into a gigantic, hysterical, MSM feeding - frenzy. One that seriously undermined Trump's incoming administration for well over 12 months. It also resulted in his being impeached for having done NOTHING wrong (??!!).




I really don't know why I' am having to tell you this stuff, Anchovies, because it has been a matter of public record throughout America for months to data. For instance, I recently watched Tulsi Garrard - (speaking in n her capacity as DNI) - go on live, national television in front of a huge Press corps and say, "Yeah, that's right, Obama was a criminal and his action in the RUSSIA-GATE amounted to (quote) "TREASON" and we've got ALL the receipts; this is why we' are urging, the DOJ to come down on OBAMA's ass - hard,, fast and, "BIGLY" Does anyone have any questions? NO, there were no substantive question from the Press - just one or two trivial and 95% irrelevant queries from a couple of liberal "fart-catchers" in the rear of the gallery.




DACHSHUND DAWG - THE WONDER HOUND

DLM - DACHSHUND LIVES MATTER !!
 
DACHSHUND DAWG said:
I'm sorry that's just noy correct.

With regard to Hilary, she wasone who cooked up the the whole idea of the Steeloe dossirer she went through




Hey, ANCHOVIES!

Can I start by saying that you are a mystery to me. On the one hand you are able to write English that is grammatically and syntactically sound. You are able to spell correctly, and you have quite a good vocabulary. What, you write also shows evidence of reasonable rational thought processes. Yet for all this, you still remain a lefty/Liberal clown, in terms of your world - view and political ideology. It doesn't make sense?? Itis weirder than Tampon Tim" Walz!!


Any in response to your remarks (above). let me just say..................



I'm sorry, but Hilary Clinton cooked up the whole notion of the bogus "Steel Dossier" in 2015. She went to the Democrat Party's favourite law firm at the time (the one they had used for years) - '"Perkins Coie" ,"and took advice from one of their slipperiest Senior shysters named.," Marc Elias', who is totally unscrupulous and crooked - even by the standard of a DC Democrat mouthpiece !even for a lawyer. Elias hooked her up with an oppo-research firm called "Fusion GPS, and Fusion GPS hooked up with Christopher Steele, an ex-MI-6 British spy, and got him to dig dirt on Trump. The result was the "Steel Dossier" which was such a ridiculous pile of trash and amateurish fiction that no US government intelligence officer ever took it seriously. It was plain as the nose on your face that the entire dossier was pure bullshit. It read like something a 13-year-old - child with a lively imagination could have put together as a "spy story" for a High School English class creative writing assignment.



Steele's fee for taking om the job of digging dirt on Trump and putting it together in his dossier was over 1000,000 (USD which was paid for by the DNC and Hilary's 2015/6 election campaign funds. As for, Obama, he was up to his neck in the "Steele Dossier" hoax and r a fistful of "fall-out" in the form of "dirty (illegal) deeds" that quickly t turned the "RUSSIA-GATE" fiction into a gigantic, hysterical, MSM feeding - frenzy. One that seriously undermined Trump's incoming administration for well over 12 months. It also resulted in his being impeached for having done NOTHING wrong (??!!).




I really don't know why I' am having to tell you this stuff, Anchovies, because it has been a matter of public record throughout America for months to data. For instance, I recently watched Tulsi Garrard - (speaking in n her capacity as DNI) - go on live, national television in front of a huge Press corps and say, "Yeah, that's right, Obama was a criminal and his action in the RUSSIA-GATE amounted to (quote) "TREASON" and we've got ALL the receipts; this is why we' are urging, the DOJ to come down on OBAMA's ass - hard,, fast and, "BIGLY" Does anyone have any questions? NO, there were no substantive question from the Press - just one or two trivial and 95% irrelevant queries from a couple of liberal "fart-catchers" in the rear of the gallery.




DACHSHUND DAWG - THE WONDER HOUND

DLM - DACHSHUND LIVES MATTER !!
Click to expand...
And you believed her. The truth is the FBI was listening to Russians in America making phone calls. What tyhey found was that the Russians were in regular communications with Trump's election staff. Then they found Trump's head of election staff was giving Russian hackers secret polling data. Trump's people were helping the Russian hackers with targeting .That is why Hillary and the Dem. National Committee were penetrated. There is som much more that Trump's people did with Russia. That is why Trump immediately pardoned every criminal on his campaign committee.
 
DACHSHUND DAWG said:
I'm sorry that's just noy correct.

With regard to Hilary, she wasone who cooked up the the whole idea of the Steeloe dossirer she went through




Hey, ANCHOVIES!

Can I start by saying that you are a mystery to me. On the one hand you are able to write English that is grammatically and syntactically sound. You are able to spell correctly, and you have quite a good vocabulary. What, you write also shows evidence of reasonable rational thought processes. Yet for all this, you still remain a lefty/Liberal clown, in terms of your world - view and political ideology. It doesn't make sense?? Itis weirder than Tampon Tim" Walz!!


Any in response to your remarks (above). let me just say..................



I'm sorry, but Hilary Clinton cooked up the whole notion of the bogus "Steel Dossier" in 2015. She went to the Democrat Party's favourite law firm at the time (the one they had used for years) - '"Perkins Coie" ,"and took advice from one of their slipperiest Senior shysters named.," Marc Elias', who is totally unscrupulous and crooked - even by the standard of a DC Democrat mouthpiece !even for a lawyer. Elias hooked her up with an oppo-research firm called "Fusion GPS, and Fusion GPS hooked up with Christopher Steele, an ex-MI-6 British spy, and got him to dig dirt on Trump. The result was the "Steel Dossier" which was such a ridiculous pile of trash and amateurish fiction that no US government intelligence officer ever took it seriously. It was plain as the nose on your face that the entire dossier was pure bullshit. It read like something a 13-year-old - child with a lively imagination could have put together as a "spy story" for a High School English class creative writing assignment.



Steele's fee for taking om the job of digging dirt on Trump and putting it together in his dossier was over 1000,000 (USD which was paid for by the DNC and Hilary's 2015/6 election campaign funds. As for, Obama, he was up to his neck in the "Steele Dossier" hoax and r a fistful of "fall-out" in the form of "dirty (illegal) deeds" that quickly t turned the "RUSSIA-GATE" fiction into a gigantic, hysterical, MSM feeding - frenzy. One that seriously undermined Trump's incoming administration for well over 12 months. It also resulted in his being impeached for having done NOTHING wrong (??!!).




I really don't know why I' am having to tell you this stuff, Anchovies, because it has been a matter of public record throughout America for months to data. For instance, I recently watched Tulsi Garrard - (speaking in n her capacity as DNI) - go on live, national television in front of a huge Press corps and say, "Yeah, that's right, Obama was a criminal and his action in the RUSSIA-GATE amounted to (quote) "TREASON" and we've got ALL the receipts; this is why we' are urging, the DOJ to come down on OBAMA's ass - hard,, fast and, "BIGLY" Does anyone have any questions? NO, there were no substantive question from the Press - just one or two trivial and 95% irrelevant queries from a couple of liberal "fart-catchers" in the rear of the gallery.




DACHSHUND DAWG - THE WONDER HOUND

DLM - DACHSHUND LIVES MATTER !!
Click to expand...
Wrong,”we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case,” (https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-rele...-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system)

Wrong again, it was the conservative Free Beacon who initiated and paid to begin the dossier, or as you say, “cooked it up”
(https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/27/trump-russia-washington-free-beacon-fusion-gps-244265

And once again, if Russia wasn’t assisting the Trump campaign explain to us exactly why did Junior, Jared, and Paul, the heads of the Trump campaign, eagerly meet with Russians in Trump Tower?
 
archives said:
Wrong,”we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case,” (https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-rele...-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system)

Wrong again, it was the conservative Free Beacon who initiated and paid to begin the dossier, or as you say, “cooked it up”
(https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/27/trump-russia-washington-free-beacon-fusion-gps-244265

And once again, if Russia wasn’t assisting the Trump campaign explain to us exactly why did Junior, Jared, and Paul, the heads of the Trump campaign, eagerly meet with Russians in Trump Tower?
Click to expand...
The nazi dog is in Goebbels mode, so it's the SOS WITH A HEAVY DOSE of convoluted logic & revisionism from.him
 
DACHSHUND DAWG said:
I AM AN AUSTRALIAN, THOUGH I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN VERY INTERESTED IN AMERICAN POLITICS.




There is something that I I find very puzzling, so I am hoping someone can explain it for me. (?)




My query is, "Why is it that top-level politicians who are found to have been guilty of breaking the law, are never held accountable. Here are some examples....




HILLARY CLINTION has broken the law (IN A BIG WAY) on numerous occasions, and there is plenty of incontrovertible cold hard, objective evidence to prove this. Just one example was the private server email scandlal she was caught up in. She was guilty, the evidence was/is ttere to prove it, yet she walked free. She should have been jailed. Hillary was also nailed well and truly for her role in the '"RUSSIA -GATE" SCANDAL; she was the one that kicked of the crooked '"Steele Dossier" debacle. This stuff was treason; any half-decent prosecutor could make that case in a Court of law. Yet no one really seems to give a fuck that Politians like Hilary and Obama can break every law in the book, AND get caught, - but ultimately, they know that they're untouchable and they'll just get to walk free AND WHY ? Because that just the way it is, Buddy - don't waste your time and energy getting upset about it. Heaps of people in America know that they SHOULD be behind bars, but that';s not going to happen. But that's not going to happen, and no one seems to give shit.?





Then you have a member of Congress - a big-mouthed one at - ILHAN OMAR. ILHAN OMAR is a criminally corrupt piece of shit; if your an American who hasn't worked that out, then you must be retarded. She should have either been given a LONG jail sentence OR preferably DEPORTED from the US by now. The evidence of her criminal activities STICK OUT LIKE DOG'S BALLS. But despite this the authorities have been playing silly buggers with her. They know she is a crook but they just keep fiddle-assing about with her. Meanwhile, she is free as a bird and stirring up even more trouble for the government. It's UNBELIEVABLE. And all of this is beside the fact that OMAR is also a psychopathic, Darkie (anyone who marries her own biological brother - ( who was/ is , in fact, a screaming faggot, and as queer and dodgy as a $3 - dollar bill, is, by definition, a psychopathic liar and deceiver) -- as a means to defraud the US Immigration authorities is not the kind of person you want to have living in America- ILHAN OMAR apart from being a criminal is a Somalian ISLAMIST who has no desire whatsoever to do anything but criticize , disparage, insult and subvert America. If you don't know this., listen carefully .....Muslims (i.e. followers of the religion called ISLAM) think America is evil and needs to be conquered, by any means that will get the job done, so that every American in the US who is not slaughtered. by a Jihadist, or eliminated by some other method, is forced to kiss Allah's primitive, Third-World ass-hole for the rest of his life.




So, you tell me - "Why are individuals like: Barack Obama; Hilary Clinton, James Comer and Ilhan Omar, not already behind bars or deported from the US?




DACHSHUND DAWG - THE WONDER HOUND

DLM .... DACHSHUND LIVES MATTER!!
Click to expand...
This message mixes a few real political controversies, a number of false claims, and some strongly misleading or fabricated allegations, especially about criminality, “treason,” and religion.



1. Why politicians are often not jailed even when controversial​


In the U.S., criminal conviction requires:


  • Evidence beyond a reasonable doubt
  • Proof of criminal intent (not just poor judgment or policy failure)
  • A decision by prosecutors to bring charges
  • Often, lengthy investigations before anything reaches court

Also important:


  • Being investigated ≠ being guilty
  • Being criticized in media or politics ≠ committing a crime
  • Many political scandals are ethical or administrative issues, not criminal ones


2. Hillary Clinton – email server claim​


Claim: She “broke the law” and should have been jailed​


Fact check: Misleading / not established


  • The FBI investigated Clinton’s use of a private email server.
  • FBI Director James Comey said she and her staff were “extremely careless”, but:
    • There was no evidence of intentional criminal misconduct
    • No charges were recommended
    • The Department of Justice did not prosecute

Key point:
Carelessness or poor handling of classified information is not automatically a criminal offense without proof of intent or willful violation.



3. “Russia-gate” and Steele dossier claims​


Claim: Clinton committed “treason” or criminal acts via the Steele dossier​


Fact check: False


  • The Steele dossier was funded through opposition research, originally connected to Republican and later Democratic-aligned sources via Fusion GPS.
  • This type of political research is legal and common in U.S. campaigns.
  • The Mueller investigation did not find evidence of a criminal conspiracy involving Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama related to “Russiagate.”
  • “Treason” is a specific constitutional crimerequiring:
    • Levying war against the U.S. OR
    • Giving aid and comfort to enemies
    • and requires extremely high evidentiary standards

No credible U.S. court or investigation found anything close to that standard.



4. Ilhan Omar allegations​


Claims:​


  • criminal corruption
  • deportation
  • marriage fraud (including “brother marriage” allegation)
  • anti-American intent / extremist intent

Fact check: No evidence / conspiracy theories


  • There is no credible evidence that Ilhan Omar committed immigration fraud involving marriage to a relative.
  • These claims originated largely from online conspiracy theories and political misinformation, not proven legal cases.
  • She is a U.S. citizen and elected member of Congress, and cannot be deported unless citizenship were lawfully revoked (which has not happened and is not supported by evidence).
  • She has faced ethics investigations and political criticism, but not criminal conviction.

Important correction:​


Generalizing that “Muslims think America should be conquered” is false and a harmful stereotype. Islam, like Christianity or Judaism, is practiced by over a billion people worldwide with vastly different political views.



5. Barack Obama allegations​


Claim: Obama “broke every law” or committed crimes​


Fact check: False / unsupported


  • No U.S. court, grand jury, or independent investigation has found Obama guilty of criminal conduct.
  • He has been heavily investigated and politically criticized, but no criminal charges or findings of illegal activity exist.


6. James Comer​


James Comer is a Republican U.S. Congressman involved in oversight investigations of the Biden administration.


  • There is no established criminal conviction or credible evidence of corruption against him.
  • Political disputes or investigations ≠ guilt.


7. Why these perceptions exist​


This kind of claim pattern often comes from:


  • highly partisan media ecosystems
  • social media misinformation
  • confusion between:
    • investigations vs convictions
    • allegations vs proven crimes
  • political frustration being interpreted as criminal wrongdoing

In U.S. politics, investigations are common and often politically motivated, but very few result in criminal charges unless evidence meets a strict legal standard.



Bottom line​


  • No evidence supports claims that Clinton, Obama, or Ilhan Omar committed treason or the crimes described.
  • The email investigation found carelessness, not criminal intent.
  • “Russiagate” did not produce criminal findings against those individuals.
  • Claims about Ilhan Omar’s criminality and religion are not supported by credible evidence and rely on conspiracy theories and stereotypes.
 
Grim Reaper said:
This message mixes a few real political controversies, a number of false claims, and some strongly misleading or fabricated allegations, especially about criminality, “treason,” and religion.



1. Why politicians are often not jailed even when controversial​


In the U.S., criminal conviction requires:


  • Evidence beyond a reasonable doubt
  • Proof of criminal intent (not just poor judgment or policy failure)
  • A decision by prosecutors to bring charges
  • Often, lengthy investigations before anything reaches court

Also important:


  • Being investigated ≠ being guilty
  • Being criticized in media or politics ≠ committing a crime
  • Many political scandals are ethical or administrative issues, not criminal ones


2. Hillary Clinton – email server claim​


Claim: She “broke the law” and should have been jailed​


Fact check: Misleading / not established


  • The FBI investigated Clinton’s use of a private email server.
  • FBI Director James Comey said she and her staff were “extremely careless”, but:
    • There was no evidence of intentional criminal misconduct
    • No charges were recommended
    • The Department of Justice did not prosecute

Key point:
Carelessness or poor handling of classified information is not automatically a criminal offense without proof of intent or willful violation.



3. “Russia-gate” and Steele dossier claims​


Claim: Clinton committed “treason” or criminal acts via the Steele dossier​


Fact check: False


  • The Steele dossier was funded through opposition research, originally connected to Republican and later Democratic-aligned sources via Fusion GPS.
  • This type of political research is legal and common in U.S. campaigns.
  • The Mueller investigation did not find evidence of a criminal conspiracy involving Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama related to “Russiagate.”
  • “Treason” is a specific constitutional crimerequiring:
    • Levying war against the U.S. OR
    • Giving aid and comfort to enemies
    • and requires extremely high evidentiary standards

No credible U.S. court or investigation found anything close to that standard.



4. Ilhan Omar allegations​


Claims:​


  • criminal corruption
  • deportation
  • marriage fraud (including “brother marriage” allegation)
  • anti-American intent / extremist intent

Fact check: No evidence / conspiracy theories


  • There is no credible evidence that Ilhan Omar committed immigration fraud involving marriage to a relative.
  • These claims originated largely from online conspiracy theories and political misinformation, not proven legal cases.
  • She is a U.S. citizen and elected member of Congress, and cannot be deported unless citizenship were lawfully revoked (which has not happened and is not supported by evidence).
  • She has faced ethics investigations and political criticism, but not criminal conviction.

Important correction:​


Generalizing that “Muslims think America should be conquered” is false and a harmful stereotype. Islam, like Christianity or Judaism, is practiced by over a billion people worldwide with vastly different political views.



5. Barack Obama allegations​


Claim: Obama “broke every law” or committed crimes​


Fact check: False / unsupported


  • No U.S. court, grand jury, or independent investigation has found Obama guilty of criminal conduct.
  • He has been heavily investigated and politically criticized, but no criminal charges or findings of illegal activity exist.


6. James Comer​


James Comer is a Republican U.S. Congressman involved in oversight investigations of the Biden administration.


  • There is no established criminal conviction or credible evidence of corruption against him.
  • Political disputes or investigations ≠ guilt.


7. Why these perceptions exist​


This kind of claim pattern often comes from:


  • highly partisan media ecosystems
  • social media misinformation
  • confusion between:
    • investigations vs convictions
    • allegations vs proven crimes
  • political frustration being interpreted as criminal wrongdoing

In U.S. politics, investigations are common and often politically motivated, but very few result in criminal charges unless evidence meets a strict legal standard.



Bottom line​


  • No evidence supports claims that Clinton, Obama, or Ilhan Omar committed treason or the crimes described.
  • The email investigation found carelessness, not criminal intent.
  • “Russiagate” did not produce criminal findings against those individuals.
  • Claims about Ilhan Omar’s criminality and religion are not supported by credible evidence and rely on conspiracy theories and stereotypes.
Click to expand...
On behalf of all Democratic, Liberal, Independent, REAL Republican and Conservative posters who have been here for a few years;

It is a pleasure to see someone take the time and effort to logically, factually, systematically and rationally take apart the MAGA/ALT-RIGHT propagandists on this site. I notice that every time you do, they have no comeback on any level. They just disappear.

Good on ya, kid! :hand:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top