IF BIDEN BECOMES POTUS CRT WILL POISON YOUR KIDS SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES

Dachsund

Verified User
There was an official Democrat Party document released recently - ( I'm sorry I cannot cite it at the moment, as, I 've lost the link, but I will find again anon and then add it to this post) - which show that a Puppet POTUS Biden would be handed a pile of Executive Orders (EOs) to sign. Included in this this will be an (EO) RESCINDING President Trump's Executive Order of 23 September this year which expanded a ban on government agencies receiving so-called "Sensitivity Training" and "Diversity Training", at a cost of millions of dollars to the American taxpayer.




The 'intellectual" ( and it makes me physically cringe to use that word ) foundation of these "Sensitivity" and "Diversity" training courses was Critical Race Theory (CRT); CRT is also the inspiration for the ongoing "1619 Project" developed by "The New York Times Magazine" last year, which I will discuss in a little more detail below.




"Critical Race Theory" was initially developed in the 1970's by an African - American scholar named Derrick Bell at Harvard Law School. Bell was a neo-Marxist (a Critical Theorist who had turned his attention to race). Bell was a typical hate-fueled, resentful, race-baiting, Black, "intellectual" shit-stirrer throughout much of his academic career. You know, one of the kind that sees racist White (European) Americans oppressing and unfairly discriminating against Black African - Americans everywhere, ( "Oh, yes, Brother ! And hear me now - hear me when I say - its all due to this evil American society which is rotten to the core with White man's "institutionalized/system racism !":rant:). That is probably why Derrick Bell was, and still is, Barack Obama's favorite professor of all during his days as a student. Probably the the most important name behind modern Critical Race Theory is Kimberle Crenshaw who worked on CRT at Columbia University in the late 1980. Crenshaw, a Black African - American, like Bell, was similarly educated and later employed at such elite, prestigious American Universities as: Harvard; Harvard Law School; Stanford; UCLA School of Law; Columbia and so on.




It really does make me wonder how prestigious Universities like these allow PURE, TOXIC, PSEUDO-ACADAMIC, TRASH like Critical Race Theory to be developed and taught on their campuses ?? Add to this the fact that YOU are funding a lot of it through your the tax you are forced to pay (or go straight to prison) and the mind
really boggles.




There are so many MAJOR problems with CRT - so much STUPIDITY - that it's impossible to set even a fraction of it all down in one post. So, I thought I'd pick out what I think most sane people would agree are a couple of very stupid core claim that CRT makes, and provide two quick examples of the kind of thinking the morons involved in creating and pedaling this crap were/ (still are) engaged in. They are summaries of two of the core tenets of CRT taken from the standard introductory text on the subject titled "Critical Race Theory: An Introduction", by Richard Delgardo and Jean Stefanic....





(1) (This is a real beauty)...A core theme of CRT is the "social construction" thesis. This holds that race and races are purely products of social thought and social relations. "Not objective, inherent, or fixed, they correspond to no biological or genetic reality; rather, races are categories that society invents, manipulates or retires when convenient."




This means if I were to collect a standard sample of, say, 100, "common or garden variety," pygmies from the West Congo in Africa and place them in a town hall next to 100 White (European) Americans for you to carefully inspect, the many differences you would note between the two groups would have come about NOT as a result of ANYTHING to do with genetic factors or biological factors; rather, all of the differences you observed between the average pygmies and the average White (European) American were actually ALL SOCIALLY CREATED - ALL DUE TO SOCIAL THOUGHT and SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS Funny, but every mainstream biologist in the Western World says that is a pile of BIG HAIRY DOG's BOLLOCKS. So lets move on to the second example of batshit - crazy CRT nonsense....





(2) "The Enlightenment" (or "The Age of Reason") was an intellectual movement in Western Europe which lasted about 150 years, what is called the "Scientific Revolution" was an important aspect of it, Isaac Newton, for example, who is generally acknowledged as the greatest ever scientist was an Enlightenment figure. The Enlightenment began in 1620 with Francis Bacon, an English Statesman who developed thescientific method) in Novum Organum and ended in 1781 with the German philosopher Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason "The Enlightenment" (and its closely associated scientific revolution) is the foundation of modern Western political, intellectual culture and remarkable scientific/technological progress
.



Probably the most basic principles of the Enlightenment/Scientific revolution were: a belief in the objective, (metaphysical), independent, existence of TRUTH; and the advocacy of reason ( i.e; the use of rational, logical, analytical modes of thought, such as deductive reasoning or, for instance the inductive reasoning of "the Scientific Method") as a means for man to discover the truth about reality. Enlightenment reasoning also impelled changes in the political theory and ideas of government. The English Enlightenment philosopher , John Locke, (1632 - 1704) had a profound influence on the thinking of the American Founders, like Thomas Jefferson. Locke argued that governments' must respect a citizen's right to individual Liberty, life and possession of private property, he also put forward the justification for the Doctrine of the Separations of Powers and "Checks and Balances" that the Founders would adopt. Other American rights that were fruits of the Enlightenment included Freedom of" Conscience", that is, the guaranteed right of a US citizen to "Freedom of Speech" and "Religious Freedom" (tragically, "Freedom of Speech" no longer exists in modern-day America - it was destroyed by the neo - Marxist Left :palm:); the economic system of free-market capitalism set down by the Scottish Enlightenment economist, Adam Smith, in 1776; the US system of Republican representative (liberal) democracy was also a legacy of the Western "Enlightenment".




Overall, Western science and its industrial/ technological achievements have been a boon for mankind that continues, as we speak, to lift millions of human beings out of famine, want and misery. They continue to steadily increase the welfare, quality of life and lifespan of people all around the globe. As has the adoption of free-market capitalism and representative democracy in foreign countries that were formerly failed states governed by tyrannical oligarchs and autocrats. Likewise, the Enlightenment inheritance of universal legal charters that enshrine a fundamental, absolute, non-fungible entitlement to natural human rights for all men and women.




CRITICAL RACE THEORY DOES NOT BELIEVE IN OBJECTIVE, INDEPENDENT TRUTH; IT BELIEVES THAT SCIENCE, REASON (ENLIGHTENMENT RATIONALITY, LOGIC AND EVIDENCE ARE AN OPPRESSIVE, WHITE "WAY OF KNOWING"




Depending on the circumstances, Critical Race Theory, resides somewhere between "generally not interested in science" and openly hostile to it. This is because CRT, using the "social construction" thesis, believes the POWER of and POLITICS of cultural groups make their way intrinsically into EVERYTHING that culture produces, Thus, science is just politics by other means to Critical Race Theory.




Because modern science was predominantly produced by White, Western European men during the "Enlightenment", CRT therefore views science as a White and Western "way of knowing". CRT therefore maintains that Western science encodes and perpetuates "White dominance" and thus really isn't fitting for Black Americans who inhabit a political culture of Blackness.




This is obviously a despicable and disgusting sentiment, and it is one that goes against the very first pillars of science: universality. Universality in science says it doesn't matter who does an experiment; the result will always be the same. This is because science believes in OBJECTIVITY, which CRT calls an oppressive myth. Listen to this crazy bullshit from two best - selling CRT authors ( Robin DiAngelo and Ozlem Sensoy)...





" One of the key contributions of Critical Theorists concerns the production of knowledge. Given that the transmission of knowledge is an integral activity in schools, critical scholars in the field of education have been especially concerned with how knowledge is produced. These scholars argue that a key element of social injustice involves the claim that particular knowledge is objective, neutral and universal. An approach based on CRT calls into question the idea that objectivity is desirable or even possible. The term used to describe this way of thinking about knowledge is that knowledge is "socially constructed". When we refer to knowledge as "socially constructed" we mean that knowledge is reflective of the values and interests of those who produce it.





Critical Race Theory falsely asserts that White (European) peoples interests are primarily served by science. This is not merely wrong (and genuinely racist), it is dangerous.




Critical Race Theory continues the genuinely racist thinking that Black people aren't suited to, or served by, science, by saying that STORYTELLING their "lived experience" is the primary mode by which Black people and CRT produce and advance knowledge. Importantly, these "lived experiences" are only considered valid if they agree with Critical Race Theory !




While stories can be informative, to create a position that science is a "way of knowing" foe White Western people (especially men) and storytelling is one more suited to racial minorities like Black African Americans, Critical Race Theory is itself RACIST (against racial minorities) and cripples the people it claims to help. This happens in multiple ways, including by undermining their capacity for critical thinking, teaching them to see the world in an us - versus - them way that oppresses them, ans associating them with harmful, negative stereotypes that rigorous methods are what White people, and nor Black people use.





If (GOD FORBID ! GOD FORBID !) the lying, corrupt, treasonous, cheating, political puppet known as Dementia Joe Biden becomes POTUS on January 21, 2021, he will be quickly directed to sign Executive Orders (or else !) One of them will unleash Critical Race Theory in euphemistically - named programs like "Sensitivity Training"," Diversity Training"," White Privilege Training" and so on into public and private sector workplaces across America. These employees will be taught that White Americans are innately and permanenlyt racist pieces of shit who should beg for forgiveness, and sincerely apologize for being permitted to exist and breathe the same air as the morally righteous American Blacks they have so cruelly oppressed since early in the 17th century. Biden's puppet-masters will also inject the poison of CRT into the K-12 curriculum through garbage revisionist historiography, like the "1619 Project", which is a false pile of lies that teaches White American students that their country is racist through and through, and that they are wicked, tainted, worthless human beings who must apologize for being White and "bend the knee to the kind of scum that make up organizations like 'Black Live Matter"..... and that's just the start !




Dachshund
 
Last edited:
The telling sign there is this is an “official Democrat Party document” but “I can not cite the link,” but it is “official,” okie dokie
 
Both policies reflect an understanding of race as a socially constructed category different from ethnicity, genetic ancestry, or biology, and aim to end the misinterpretation of race as a biological category defined by genetic traits or biological differences. As the policies note, this practice of accepting race as a biological construct—known as racial essentialism—exacerbates health disparities and results in detrimental health outcomes for marginalized and minoritized communities.

Additionally, the policies call on AMA to take swift action, including:

Encouraging characterizing race as a social construct, rather than an inherent biological trait.
Supporting ending the practice of using race as a proxy for biology in medical education, research and clinical practice.
Encouraging medical education programs to recognize the harmful effects of presenting race as biology in medical education through curriculum changes that explain how racism results in health disparities by:
Demonstrating how the category “race” can influence health outcomes
Presenting race within a socio-ecological model of individual, community and society to explain how racism and systemic oppression result in racial health disparities
Recommending that clinicians and researchers focus on genetics and biology, the experience of racism, and social determinants of health when describing risk factors for disease.


https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/new-ama-policies-recognize-race-social-not-biological-construct
 
Both policies reflect an understanding of race as a socially constructed category different from ethnicity, genetic ancestry, or biology, and aim to end the misinterpretation of race as a biological category defined by genetic traits or biological differences. As the policies note, this practice of accepting race as a biological construct—known as racial essentialism—exacerbates health disparities and results in detrimental health outcomes for marginalized and minoritized communities.

Additionally, the policies call on AMA to take swift action, including:

Encouraging characterizing race as a social construct, rather than an inherent biological trait.
Supporting ending the practice of using race as a proxy for biology in medical education, research and clinical practice.
Encouraging medical education programs to recognize the harmful effects of presenting race as biology in medical education through curriculum changes that explain how racism results in health disparities by:
Demonstrating how the category “race” can influence health outcomes
Presenting race within a socio-ecological model of individual, community and society to explain how racism and systemic oppression result in racial health disparities
Recommending that clinicians and researchers focus on genetics and biology, the experience of racism, and social determinants of health when describing risk factors for disease.


https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/new-ama-policies-recognize-race-social-not-biological-construct

I LOL'd at racism results in health disparities.

Like sickle cell is from racism?

Latinos & Asians don't have nearly as much heart disease & diabetes as Blacks, despite also being minorities subjected to discrimination here.
 
Wouldn't matter much, anyways.

Because my premises are similar to the OP.

Opie doesn't have anything presented to have a side on. He posted a purposely chaffing opinion on a known sensitive topic with no evidence. Trolling 101. He knowingly left it with no substance while acting like it's chock-full. Shitposting 101.
 
Believing in biological equality is faulty logic, or rather lack of logic.





Yes, and that includes genotype (i.e. the genetic constitution of an individual organism like a human being). It is a scientific fact that an individual's genetic make-up has an substantial influence on the development of his/her brain and thereby the nature of the constituent neuroanatomical structures and neural functioning of his/her mature adult brain. The nature of an individual's MIND - of his lived experiential diurnal consciousness and it's components/contents, including: cognitive (including general intelligence or "g-factor", moral reasoning capacity/competence and Executive Functions like Short-Term Working Memory, Sustained Attention, Response Inhibition, etc); Sense Perceptlons (visual, colors, shapes, auditory, olfactory, tactile and so on); Emotions (anger, love, hatred, joy); Moods ( generalized negative affect, for example Melancholic Depression or positive affect , like hypomania; bipolar affect), bodily sensations like (pains, itches, etc) All of these mental states/events/processes are closely associated/correlated with neural activity rates and types of neural firing glucose metabolism, etc) in different anatomical regions of the brain.



.


WE do not know how the human brain creates consciousness. That remain a profound enigma. But neuroscientist have demonstrated that there is a close correlation between physical brain activity brain activity and events in consciousness. For instance if I were to give you a 200mcg dose of LSD-25, which is simply a chemical that one can manufacture in a laboratory, about 20 to 30 minutes after you swallowed the LSD tablet, you would experience profound psychedelic phenomena in your mind: swirling, blooming colours, synaesthesia, hallucinated images of fantastical objects, an "expansion of consciousness, such as the experience of conceiving/perceiving insight into the nature absolute Truth/meaning/ultimate reality. What is interesting is that as the dose of LSD taken is increased from, say 50mcg to 100mcg to 15 mcg to 300mcg to 500 mcg the intensity of the psychedelic phenomena experienced becomes more intense and profound. Neuropharmacologists know that LSD binds to 5-HT2a serotonin receptors in the brain and other such "mechanical", pharmacodynamic facts, but SO WHAT ?? The most fascinating question here is how on Earth does this fact (of LSD binding to serotonin receptors in the human brain) explain the concurrent dramatic changes in CONSCIOUSNESS a person who has taken the drug experiences (which are, BTW, very real)?







Finally on the topic of race, intelligence and genetics which is totally taboo in politically correct polite society. In Australia (where I have lived for decades), the scientific community tell us that Black Indigenous Aboriginals lived on the continent for something like 50,000 years before the first British colonists first encountered then in the later part of the 18th century. THey reported that the aboriginals were a primitive, Stone Age, hunter-gatherer people, who had not invented the wheel no practice any kind of agriculture. Their average IQ has been repeatedly measured by psychometricians and found to be between 62 and 64 points, which is drastically low. In the West psychiatrists use the threshold of 70 points to demarcate mental retardation. If you score 70 points or below on a validated, professionally administered IQ test you are diagnosed as having mental retardation. What it means is that in modern-day Australia which is a majority White -Anglo nation, where the population of White descendants of the original English colonists have an average IQ of 100 points and have build an advanced, industrialized Western society like the US or UK, the native Black Aboriginal cannot function adaptively in society because they do do have the cognitive ability. The result is tragic, on the one hand they enjoy having access to all the fruits of advanced Western society: iPhones, Lap-Tops, Fast Food, motor car/trucks, modern medicines, mod-cons, etc; but on the the hand they simply cannot integrate successfully into a modern Western society because they are, to put it bluntly too stupid. If you think of any antisocial, maladaptive, dysfunctional behavior: drug abuse/addiction, domestic abuse, violent and property crime, child sexual abuse (the result of watching Western pornography), poor health, high rates of chronic unemployment and government welfare dependency, high rates of youth mental illness/suicide and so on and so on. It is heartbreaking and for many decades the Federal government has injected countless billions of dollars into social, educational and health, etc programs in order to try and remedy the problem. But, NOTHING has ever made a positive difference, nothing the Federal government has ever done - and it truly has bent over backwards since the 1970s to help the Aboriginal peoples (with, I must add the keen support and good will of the White Australian public, who have footed a hefty bill over decades for legion support programs and initiatives of every kind, in tax dollars) - has changed things one iota.





Why ?




Because, although a mainstream scientist is currently not permitted to say it, Twin Studies show that IQ is highly heritable, that is it seems to be largely determined genetically. The American Psychological Association, who are about as "buttoned - down" and conservative a group as you can get, have stated that in adults general intelligence is about 70% to 80% determined genetically. That means it is basically FIXED.






So if you are an Australian Aboriginal adult with an accurately measured IQ of , say, 66 points - (that officially indicates "mental retardation" in the West, and you can quibble all you like about an IQ of 70 points being an arbitrary cut-off for mental retardation, but if YOU were actually forced meet and spend some time chatting with adults whose IQ was below 70 points, I think YOU would be the first one to say," For Fucks Sake that person/s was really fucking dumb !! ) - and you are living in a society where the average IQ is about 100 points, to put it bluntly , you're fucked. There is no program, no form of education, no drug, or medical treatment or psychological therapy that we have in the advanced, technological West in the year 2020, that will be able to successfully raise your IQ. In the future ? Who knows? But right now, the kind of medical technology that could effectively and safely raise a low IQ to, say, a normal- level IQ does not exit. Just the bioethical implications alone of actually doing something like this, if scientists in the future ever claimed one day that it was theoretically possible, would be mind-blowing.







I am not a racist, BTW, in my youth I worked with many Native Australian Aboriginal do laboring jobs on big farms (we call "properties or "stations" in Australia, clearing peach weeds from crops of cotton with a hoe, moving herds of sheep/cattle to agistment paddocks, loading big trucks with hundreds of 15 kg bags of wheat or "Milo" to be taken to market, keeping the floor of the shearing sheds clear for the professional shears as the cut the woolen fleece of sheep (that was like keeping these hair that falls on a barber shop floor constantly swept up and disposed up only it hard, non-stop work, doing general maintenance on sheds and pig sties and horse stables - all sorts of things, in order to help pay for the costs of my University expenses during end of-term vacations, etc. I often worked closely with native aboriginal in teams of up to 15 or 20 laborers that were called "gangs". I found them to be gentle and child-like people; at lunch-times if you didn't have a great deal of your own food, they insisted on sharing their "tucker" with you. They treated me badly in any way, even though I was very often the only white dude in a gang of 20 Aboriginal workers who had been hired by the owner of the property.





There are many White liberals in Australia, often stupid, "woke", (female) race industry activists and/or neo-Marxist/Postmodernist, who encourage Australian Aboriginals to believe that they are victims of transgenerational psychic trauma - a kind of post traumatic stress syndrome that each generation of indigenous Black Aboriginals have transmitted to the next generation beginning with the massive injustice those who were contemporaries of the original British colonists of the late 18th century were deal by the white 'invaders". It began when, in 1770, Captain James Cook declared Australia "terra nullis" (a latin legal term meaning, "Nobody's Land"), hoisted the "Union Jack" (i.e. the Union Flag), and seized "New South Wales" - (which is what Cook called Australia at the time) as a new possession of the British Crown, thus dispossessing Aboriginals as the rightful owners of the land. Australia is a very large continent, and with the arrival of the British there was still plenty of room for all. We are told, however, that the Aboriginal people have a very deep spiritual "connection" with the land, and this was a cause of conflict when the local native tribes were ousted from the coastal lands where the British colonists began to build their first settlements. However it seems to me that most aboriginals in 2020 would prefer to be close to "land" that provided a good source of Western goods and services (tobacco, alcohol, nutritious food, Western clothing and foot-ware, hospitals, ATM machines, medicines/pharmacies, doctors' clinics and other commodities than a primitive , traditional existence on any sacred traditional land living as they had for most of the past 65,000 years before the arrival of the British Westerners and their culture. The same "woke" White Australian socialists actually created an entire "bumph" history detailing genocidal massacres of Australian Aboriginals and an infamous claim that the White Anglo Australian political establishment attempted to eradicate the entire Aboriginal culture by "stealing" half-caste Aboriginal children aged (mostly) five or below from their families and adopting them out to White middle-class, married couples, or placing them in institutions. 50,000 to 100,000 thousand Aboriginal children were said to have been "stolen" from their families - often forcefully - by state and federal government officials and authorized religious missionaries between (roughly) 1910 and 1970. The truth is that there were no enormous massacres, nor were 50,000 to 100,000 Aboriginal children taken from their families, it was all lies. There was, of course fighting between Aboriginals and British colonists but the numbers of British and Aboriginal combatants killed in any of the documented battles that took place were very modest; around150 (in total), at worst. As for the "stolen" Aboriginal children, they were victims in a Hitlerian eugenics project whose goal to eliminate the Aboriginal race. It turns out that about 8, 250 Aboriginal children were taken from their families by state and federal authorities because there were being sexually abused by their fathers and other male relatives, they were living in welfare camps and filthy shanty establishments riddled with alcoholism and domestic violence, they were malnourished infected with syphilis and/ or gonorrhea, etc, etc.. Most of the Aboriginal children taken were half-castes who had a White father and thus were not necessarily accepted by the tribal elders. During the same period of 60 to 70 years a proportionate number of White Australian children were taken from their parents for exactly the same kinds of reason. Namely, their heath and physical/mental well-being had been placed in serious jeopardy, due to unacceptable parental neglect or abuse and they need to be placed in the care of responsible and diligent new "parents."







The guy who exposed the false racist history of Australia was a traditional, historian called Keith Windschuttle. Windschuttle is "old school", he sensed that the modern "woke" historiographies denouncing White Australia's outrageous abuse and massacre of Indigenous Aboriginals since the late 18th century were suspect, ditto the infamous, shameful scandal of the "Stolen Generation" of Aboriginal Children (as they came to be called by the Media). Slowly and meticulously - (God only knows how long it took him !) - Windschuttle located all of the relevant archives from where ever they were stored around Australia and looked up the number of Aboriginal children who were taken into custody for every year that the various state authorities and the Federal authority kept records which ran from the late 1890's to 1970 and the name and age of each Aboriginal child, why they were taken from their biological parents, were t where they were resettled, whether they kept in periodic contact with their natural parents and so. He did the same with the records of Aboriginal battle casualties dating back to the early 1800s, and discovered that the blood-drenched massacres of Aboriginals that the British colonial troops were said to have carried out in Tasmania were all pure myth and legend.




The point is that if you are from Race X, and ON AVERAGE Race X has a smaller brain volume than Race Y. Race X will have a lower Ave IQ than Race Y.






For example, , thus the Ave IQ of adult Aboriginals is 62 - 64 points , while the average IQ of White Anglo Australians is 100 point Adult Australian Aboriginals have a smaller average brain volume than the average brain volume of adult While Anglo Australians.






On average the behavior of adult individuals is morally BAD; while on average the moral behavior of average White Anglo Australians is relatively morally GOOD.





That's interesting, I think (?)





Dachshund
 
Last edited:
Back
Top