Compensation for those who lost their property, if their heirs can be found, might be considered just. But who should pay it? The heirs of those who committed the murders, arson, looting, destruction? That's hardly fair to *them* since they didn't commit this atrocity. Taxpayers, after a vote? What if the vote goes against compensating the victims' heirs?
--->"Compensation for those who lost their property".
That seems to be the Narrative.
'Private Property' is ingrained in the US psychology. It's the Basis for Capitalism.
It comes down to 'Who owned the Property'. And 'Who owns the Property Now'. It looks like a 'Full Employment for Lawyers' Program, so I feel this has legs.
Like I said, the 'murders, arson, looting, destruction' ISN'T the focus here.