Impeachment: Judge Napolitano explains it all to you morons

What has Trump done, where to begin, just off the top of my hear: refused to release tax records,

Not a requirement to be President.

refused to set aside business interests,

LIE; he has let go of the day to day management as required by law.

questioned the legitimacy of judges whose rulings he disagreed with,

So what? The Judge's decisions are questionable. Obama did the same shit. :rolleyes:

promoted conspiracies in his own government,

What conspiracies? The Conspiracy of Russian collusion that was disproved by the $30 million dollar two year Mueller HOAX investigation? Or the one where we have PROOF that Obama and a cabal of his holdovers attempted to disrupt and destroy a Presidential campaign and this Presidency. It is third world Fascism.

You don't get to decide asshat.

labeled Americans that criticize him as traitors, evil, enemies of the Country, personally attempts to sway Federal Reserve decisions, and most of all, lies to the American people at an Olympian record pace

As I said, the two were as dissimilar as similar and more so compared to today, one started with the findings of a four year independent council, the other a special prosecutor appointed by the investigating Congressional Committee, neither which are present today.

There was NOTHING dissimilar about them. The current charade is the only one dissimilar where no criminal conduct has been found and where a new HOAX is being perpetrated by a lying asshole named Schiff. The same LYING asshole who proclaimed there was most definitely evidence of Russian collusion that couldn't be found after TWO fucking years.

And it was the same in past impeachment inquiries, the majority party controlled the hearings, had final say on who was called and where testimonies would be taken, and with the GOP's revision to the House rules, these guidelines gave the majority even more power

Wrong; read my link to see how they were conducted in a similar fashion.

Your procedure argument is lame, neither the illegal nor unprecedented rationale is applicable

It is only lame to the uneducated and dishonest. To anyone else with a rational mind and a memory of history, they make perfect sense. This charade will lead to a massive failure on the part of the Democratic Party of the Jackass.

You've NEVER been right about ANYTHING. I haven't been wrong. There is that. ;)
 
giphy.gif

STFU you buffoonish ass clown. :rolleyes:
 
*A six month long, made for TV government paid negative campaign ad, with all the pomp, circumstance, pageantry and sobriety important hearing of the United States Government produce.
Hear ye hear ye. Unfurl the scrolls already. Can't wait!

It won't change a thing; Democrats are headed for a clown show and Trump is headed for re-election and choosing one last SC Justice. ;)
 
"the House rules, which were adopted in 2015, when Republicans had the majority, clearly authorize the process that Schiff, D-Calif., is utilizing."


https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/judge-andrew-napolitano-hiding-plain-sight

1. The secret hearings were the Rules YOU adopted and WE followed.
2. You morons stormed proceedings because you were mad WE were following YOUR rules.
3. Initial witness interviews are ALWAYS secret.
4. You opposed Pelosi in her attempt to assuage YOUR stupidity by opposing a resolution for PUBLIC hearings despite that we did not have to.
5. There are no contested facts, in fact Trump admits the salient facts and the evidence of them is conclusive.
6. The only bona fide issue is whether the agreed upon facts amount to an impeachable offense.
7. Instead you attack YOUR processes, attack our acceding to your amended process due to your complaint about your own rules, and smear witnesses.


Very dumb.

Utter bullshit. The secret interviews HAVE NEVER BEEN USED TO TRY TO NULLIFY A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION...EVER.


Another NEVER TRUMPER SPOUTING BULLSHIT, is what Judge Nappy is....and he is WRONG 90% of the time....JUST LIKE HE "PREDICTIONS" ABOUT THE MUELLER REPORT.


He's FULLACRAP.
 
Hey, I have an idea, lets spend exactly a year debating the exact degree of crumminess Trumpo is!

This is awesome... Slow motion beatdown.
 
Hey, I have an idea, lets spend exactly a year debating the exact degree of crumminess Trumpo is!

This is awesome... Slow motion beatdown.

just imagine the tweets we're going to see during these hearings

it's hilarious watching GOP pols SCRAMBLING after his every unhinged tweet, totally blindside by every one...…….

popcorn
 
Not a requirement to be President.



LIE; he has let go of the day to day management as required by law.



So what? The Judge's decisions are questionable. Obama did the same shit. :rolleyes:



What conspiracies? The Conspiracy of Russian collusion that was disproved by the $30 million dollar two year Mueller HOAX investigation? Or the one where we have PROOF that Obama and a cabal of his holdovers attempted to disrupt and destroy a Presidential campaign and this Presidency. It is third world Fascism.

You don't get to decide asshat.

labeled Americans that criticize him as traitors, evil, enemies of the Country, personally attempts to sway Federal Reserve decisions, and most of all, lies to the American people at an Olympian record pace



There was NOTHING dissimilar about them. The current charade is the only one dissimilar where no criminal conduct has been found and where a new HOAX is being perpetrated by a lying asshole named Schiff. The same LYING asshole who proclaimed there was most definitely evidence of Russian collusion that couldn't be found after TWO fucking years.



Wrong; read my link to see how they were conducted in a similar fashion.



It is only lame to the uneducated and dishonest. To anyone else with a rational mind and a memory of history, they make perfect sense. This charade will lead to a massive failure on the part of the Democratic Party of the Jackass.

You've NEVER been right about ANYTHING. I haven't been wrong. There is that.

Why is it Trumpkins can't respond to complete thoughts, everything has to be broken down into phrases? Like middle school

All, and I mean all, you replied with is bogus.

Precedents aren't requirements, you just blew your intial "point"

Prior Presidents removed themselves from any business interests they had, and other than Trump saying so, there is no proof he has removed himself from anything, and we all know how honest Trump is when he says something

Obama never personally attacked individual Judges, the SCOTUS once as a group, but never launched personal attacks, especially ones based on the Judge's ethnic background

Way prior to Mueller, Trump attacked or dissed his own Justice Dept, CIA, NSA, Pentagon, Homeland Security, and an array of other Gov't agencies and heads of agencies some of which he even appointed

I gave dissimilarities, and last I knew, looking into accusations didn't need a defined criminal charge to begin, I believe that is the purpose of an inquiry

And "there is that" is nothing, especially considering the majority of it has already been invalidated
 
All, and I mean all, you replied with is bogus.

Nothing I stated was bogus; they are FACTS. You should try facts some time. They will do you good you pathetic twat. This is why one cannot argue with idiots like you; you'll ignore the FACTS and declare everything you don't agree with bogus.

Fuck off you brain dead twat. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top